Package: xpdf-utils
Version: 3.02-12
Severity: grave
xpdf as a rendering library was removed from Debian, with
the justification that a fork of this library, poppler, could be
used instead.
However, the command-line utilities in poppler-utils are significantly
different than those of xpdf and are
OK, I've gotten myself out of my predicament.
In a root shell launched using the Debian Lenny
installation disk Rescue Mode, I re-installed
grub-pc (because I had previously tried to recover
by downgrading to grub-legacy), then I typed the
following sequence of commands:
mv /boot/grub /boot/grub.s
After running upgrade-from-grub-legacy, my system
is unbootable.
I don't recall whether I saw such a checkbox, or if I
did, whether I checked it. So I am replying to this
bug rather than opening a new one on the chance
that this is the same issue.
I tried reconfiguring grub-pc, reinstalling grub-
Yes, the Adobe download page at:
http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/download/download.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash&P2_Platform=Linux
reports that version 9,0,115,0 of Adobe Flash Player for Linux
was posted on 2007-12-03.
So we need yet another urgent upgrade of the Debian package.
This is ob
Frank Küster wrote:
Well, there are still the info files. Whether it is grave or important
to not include the html docs, this I leave to the maintainer.
Never mind, let's fix it!
However, the bug can be fixed by adding rsync to Build-Depends-Indep.
At least this helped when I tried in a pbui
Is there a version of digikamimageplugins that
can be used with digikam 0.9.0 and libexiv2-0.12?
We are keeping in front of you but only just. :-)
Thanks. I know that maintaining a package with so
many dependencies is a challenge. But when you are
successful, that is where Debian provides its
digikam 0.9.0 (final) is currently available in the experimental
distribution. I would suggest that you both upgrade to 0.9.0 and advise
if this issue is still a problem
Is there a version of digikamimageplugins that
can be used with digikam 0.9.0 and libexiv2-0.12?
Thanks,
Yitz
--
To UNSUBSC
Mark Purcell wrote:
...we are going to... revert digikam in etch to 0.8.2 due to a
library transition for libexiv2...
digikam 0.9.0 (final) is currently available in the experimental distribution.
I would suggest that you both upgrade to 0.9.0 and advise if this issue is
still a problem.
Where
As a heavy users of digicam (actually my kids, not me,
anyway...), we would lose a LOT more data from digicam
being removed from etch than from this bug.
It would be nice if 0.9.0-final could make it into etch,
but I have my doubts that it is possible at this point.
So I urgently request that th
On testing, that work-around is not possible -
70 dependencies prevent upgrading python2.4-minimal
to 2.4.4-1.
So python2.5 still cannot install on testing.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10 matches
Mail list logo
