Bug#635382: [tex-live] Bug#635382: new release of latex-unicode

2012-04-20 Thread Wolfgang Jeltsch
Am Freitag, den 20.04.2012, 10:16 +0100 schrieb Robin Fairbairns: > all we await, now, is the upload. This is done now. :-) Best wishes, Wolfgang -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#635382: [tex-live] Bug#635382: new release of latex-unicode

2012-04-20 Thread Wolfgang Jeltsch
Am Donnerstag, den 19.04.2012, 22:46 +0100 schrieb Robin Fairbairns: > Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote: > > > By the way, the package is already called “ucs” in TeXLive. However, it > > is called “unicode” in MiKTeX. And it is called “unicode” on CTAN, and > > its director

Bug#635382: [tex-live] new release of latex-unicode

2012-04-20 Thread Wolfgang Jeltsch
Am Mittwoch, den 18.04.2012, 17:47 +0300 schrieb Wolfgang Jeltsch: > Furthermore, I have a problem with building the documentation. I’ve > added a changelog, but it isn’t included in the PDF that LaTeX produces. > I’ve tried with an additional \RecordChanges, but with no success. I’ve

Bug#635382: [tex-live] new release of latex-unicode

2012-04-19 Thread Wolfgang Jeltsch
Am Freitag, den 20.04.2012, 00:09 +0200 schrieb Reinhard Kotucha: > On 2012-04-19 at 23:17:50 +0300, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote: > > At least, the following minimal example works as expected: > > > > > \documentclass{article} > > > > > > \usepackage[utf8x]{

Bug#635382: [tex-live] Bug#635382: new release of latex-unicode

2012-04-19 Thread Wolfgang Jeltsch
Am Mittwoch, den 18.04.2012, 14:33 -0700 schrieb Karl Berry: > I wonder whether it is sensible to always call the package ucs > > Please do. There are far too many gratuitious name differences already, > and ucs is at least a little more specific than "unicode". By the way, the package is alread

Bug#635382: [tex-live] new release of latex-unicode

2012-04-19 Thread Wolfgang Jeltsch
Am Mittwoch, den 18.04.2012, 23:51 +0200 schrieb Reinhard Kotucha: > If someone uses control sequences like \ohorn in macro packages > already, does he have to change them to \horn o when using ucs? No. The ucs package doesn’t change the way \horn, \ohorn, etc. work. It just ensures that whenever

Bug#635382: [tex-live] new release of latex-unicode

2012-04-18 Thread Wolfgang Jeltsch
Am Mittwoch, den 18.04.2012, 18:07 +0200 schrieb Werner LEMBERG: > > I have no idea what this change was for. And while I have found > > references to \OHORN, \ohorn, \UHORN, and \uhorn in The > > Comprehensive LateX Symbol List, I haven’t found references to > > \horn. So maybe, it is best if I j

Bug#635382: [tex-live] new release of latex-unicode

2012-04-18 Thread Wolfgang Jeltsch
Am Mittwoch, den 18.04.2012, 17:47 +0300 schrieb Wolfgang Jeltsch: > Am Freitag, den 13.04.2012, 07:31 +0900 schrieb Norbert Preining: > > Hi Wolfgang, > > > > thanks for your answer. > > > > On Do, 12 Apr 2012, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote: > > > Norbert’s

Bug#635382: [tex-live] new release of latex-unicode

2012-04-18 Thread Wolfgang Jeltsch
Am Freitag, den 13.04.2012, 07:31 +0900 schrieb Norbert Preining: > Hi Wolfgang, > > thanks for your answer. > > On Do, 12 Apr 2012, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote: > > Norbert’s e-mail made me start with the polishing of the Unicode package > > I had planned to do some time

Bug#635382: [tex-live] new release of latex-unicode

2012-04-18 Thread Wolfgang Jeltsch
Am Mittwoch, den 11.04.2012, 23:06 +0200 schrieb Reinhard Kotucha: > On 2012-04-11 at 15:47:06 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: > > Dear Wolfgang, > > > > I was taking a look at your darcs repository and compared it with > > what is currently available on the CTAN. Besides the addition > > of .dtx/.

Bug#635382: [tex-live] new release of latex-unicode

2012-04-12 Thread Wolfgang Jeltsch
Am Mittwoch, den 11.04.2012, 23:06 +0200 schrieb Reinhard Kotucha: > On 2012-04-11 at 15:47:06 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: > > > Dear Wolfgang, > > > > I was taking a look at your darcs repository and compared it with > > what is currently available on the CTAN. Besides the addition > > o

Bug#635382: latex-unicode source

2011-11-30 Thread Wolfgang Jeltsch
Am Dienstag, den 26.07.2011, 14:41 +0200 schrieb Lionel Elie Mamane: > forwarded 635382 jelt...@informatik.tu-cottbus.de > thanks > > (Please keep 635...@bugs.debian.org in the CC in replies.) > > Hi, > > According to archives of newsgroup comp.text.tex, you are now the > maintainer of latex-uni