On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 3:39 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2024 at 11:34 AM Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >
> > OK.
> >
> > Using dh_strip instead of dh_strip_nondeterminism (default) ...
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> In my latest build I created an OVERRIDE in
INFO: dracut (103-1.1) was uploaded.
-Sedat-
Hi,
I followed solution #1:
> The quick and easy solution would be to rebuild dracut-install,
> but the release team refused to binNMU it (#1079038).
See [1].
Best regards,
-Sedat-
Link: https://bugs.debian.org/1079031#26 [1]
-clang18-kcfi.dracut-install_BROKEN
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 45M 16. Aug 05:56
/boot/initrd.img-6.10.5-2-amd64-clang18-kcfi.orig
Thanks.
Best regards,
-Sedat-
P.S.: dch extract
$ head -10 debian/changelog
dracut (103-1.1~dileks) unstable; urgency=medium
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Rebuild against l
With attached debdiff I was able to build and install:
manpages-de (4.9.2-1.1~dileks)
- Sedat -
manpages-l10n-4_9_2-1_dileks-v2.debdiff
Description: Binary data
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 9:50 PM Craig Small wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 07:39, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>
>> Small nit:
>> On a quick view on latest manpages-l10n I still see the duplicates in
>> debian/rules e.g. kill.1 (manpages-de).
>
> The cr
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 9:38 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 8:59 PM Craig Small wrote:
> >
> > For testing this I installed Procps and *all*of the generated man pages and
> > that seemed to be fine.
> >
> > That's slightly different t
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 8:59 PM Craig Small wrote:
>
> For testing this I installed Procps and *all*of the generated man pages and
> that seemed to be fine.
>
> That's slightly different to the patch I put in the bug report but I emailed
> Helge the difference.
>
Thanks Craig.
Small nit:
On a
user$ sudo LC_ALL=C dpkg -i manpages-de_4.9.1-2.1~dileks_all.deb
(Reading database ... 341292 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack manpages-de_4.9.1-2.1~dileks_all.deb ...
Unpacking manpages-de (4.9.1-2.1~dileks) ...
Setting up manpages-de (4.9.1-2.1~dileks) ...
Processin
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 7:05 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I modified Craig's procps_manpage.diff as it still shows conflicts on
> manpages-de installation: e.g. man5/sysctl.conf.5.
>
> Attached is my manpages-de_procps_dileks.debdiff.
> The list of file-rem
Hi,
I modified Craig's procps_manpage.diff as it still shows conflicts on
manpages-de installation: e.g. man5/sysctl.conf.5.
Attached is my manpages-de_procps_dileks.debdiff.
The list of file-removal is alphabetically sorted.
The debdiff is on top of (pending) manpages-l10n 4.9.1-2 solving
issues
Hi,
I applied Craig's procps_manpage.diff on top of latest manpages-10n
Git.
I see double entries "kill.1" for manpages-de:
[ procps_manpage.diff ]
+ # Remove manpages from procps
+ rm -f debian/manpages-de/usr/share/man/de/man1/kill.1
+ rm -f debian/manpages-de/usr/share/man/de/man1/free.1
+
irst, I wanted to simply remove the above file via debian/rules
(manpages-l10n).
So what is your suggestion?
- Sedat -
> - Craig
>
>
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 at 03:39, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>
>> [ CC Helge & Craig ]
>>
>> With the attached debdiff on top of H
[ CC Helge & Craig ]
With the attached debdiff on top of Helge's 4.9.1-1 tarball I was able
to co-install latest procps, psmisc and (pending) manpages-de.
Check with dpkg:
root# dpkg -l | egrep 'manpages-de|procps|psmisc' | awk '/^ii/ {print
$1 " " $2 " " $3}' | column -t
ii libprocps8:amd64 2
I filed Debian Bug #982372 "manpages-de: procps: File sconflict
between procps and manpages-de".
To quote from [0]:
On d-u I see:
root# RELEASE="buildd-unstable" ; LC_ALL=C apt-get dist-upgrade -V -t $RELEASE
...
The following packages will be REMOVED:
manpages-de (4.9.1-1)
task-german (3.
Hi,
installing manpages-de from Helge's tarball (see [1])...
dileks@iniza:~/src/manpages-l10n/current$ sudo dpkg -i
manpages-de_4.9.1-1_all.deb
..let's me coexist psmisc with manpages-de:
-ii manpages-de 4.2.0-1
+ii manpages-de 4.9.1-1
+ii psmisc 23.4-2
Thanks to all involved people.
Regards,
Hi,
I hit the same problem as Axel B. reported.
# RELEASE="buildd-unstable" ; LC_ALL=C apt-get dist-upgrade -V -t $RELEASE
...
The following packages will be REMOVED:
manpages-de (4.2.0-1)
task-german (3.63)
The following packages will be upgraded:
psmisc (23.3-1 => 23.4-2)
1 upgraded, 0 ne
Hi,
after I upgraded to Linux v4.17.8 in Debian/buster today, I had the same issue.
root@iniza:~# cat /proc/version
Linux version 4.17.0-1-amd64 (debian-ker...@lists.debian.org) (gcc
version 7.3.0 (Debian 7.3.0-26)) #1 SMP Debian 4.17.8-1 (2018-07-20)
With upgrading to virtualbox{-dkms,-qt} (5.2
Hi,
I pinged Marco on #systemd on 23-Nov-2011, but got no answer.
I can *confirm* this bug has stolen also my time, not much, but
anyway, the fix is trivial by checking Debian's BTS and changed
/lib/systemd/system/udev.service file accordingly.
Just FYI, the problem occured here with systemd not w
Package: quassel
Version: 0.7.1-1
Justification: user security hole
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Hi,
Upstream is highly recommending to upgrade quassel to 0.7.1 and 0.6.3 [1].
The 0.7.1 version found its way quickly into the offcial repositories
but not v0.6.3 which is for squeeze.
As this is a
tom/proc
# umount /mnt/custom
- Sedat -
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> Hi Dominique,
>
> I tried to reproduce on how to fix the problem: You have a little
> typo, here are the correct steps:
>
> 1. boot systemrescuecd
> 2. mount -t ext3 /dev/sda2 /
Hi Dominique,
I tried to reproduce on how to fix the problem: You have a little
typo, here are the correct steps:
1. boot systemrescuecd
2. mount -t ext3 /dev/sda2 /mnt/custom <--- TYPO
3. mount --bind /proc /mnt/custom/proc
4. mount --bind /dev/ /mnt/custom/dev
5. chroot /mnt/custom bin/bash
6.
All files from a quick (re)build for i386 incl. report from user
omong_kosong (see [1]).
- Sedat -
[1] http://files.iniza.org/xserver-xorg-video-nv/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.or
Hi,
I can affirm the broken build of xulrunner_1.9~b5-2 on Debian/sid/i386.
Greetz,
Sedat
$ tail -30 ~/src/xulrunner_1.9~b5-2_i386.build
dh_fixperms -a
dh_makeshlibs -plibxpcomglue0d -V 'libxpcomglue0d (>= 1.9~b5-2)' -- -c4
dpkg-gensymbols: warning: some new symbols appeared in the symbols file:
PYGTK problem solved, please CLOSE the ticket.
-SD
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sedat Dilek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 18.04.2008 00:40
Subject: Re: [ephy-webkitgtk] BUG#476229: pygtk-2.0: pkgconfig path set
wrong
To: Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The PYGTK proble
python-defaults-2.5.2-0.2-nmu.diff does NOT fix the PyGTK problem.
-SD
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=476229#58
2008/4/17, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
> > please do NOT misunderstand me: It was jus
26 matches
Mail list logo
