heers,
sam
--
sam clegg
:: s...@superduper.net :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369
$superduper: .signature,v 1.13 2003/06/17 10:29:24 sam Exp $
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 22:02 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hi Sam Clegg
>
> Any news or ETA on this one? It is almost a month ago you said you would
> apply the patch from Onkar Shinde (which will also fix #548810).
Thanks for the nudge Niels. My laptop was destroyed recently but wit
Thanks Onkar. All changes look great. will apply and upload.
On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 10:55 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> Please find attached the patch that fixes this bug and improves the
> packaging in general.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Onkar
--
sam clegg
:: s...@superduper.net :: htt
m working on a solution right now. Most likely I will re-upload boo
from the boo1 sources and create boo2 packages with seperate libbooX-cil
and booX packages.
--
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369
$superduper: .signature,v 1.13 2003/06/17 10:29:24 sam E
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 14:09 +0530, Kartik Mistry wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In my case it works, without any problems!
Indeed, works for my just fine on sid. Will try etch just to be sure.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
against 1.1 and
other build againt 2.0. I suspect that the former will be good
enough for now. I'll make sure I can build monodevelop before
uploading.
I'll certainly look into the dh_clideps problem, too.
--
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D9
mer, and perhaps
mail the nant maintainer to see what he thinks about the later.
--
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369
$superduper: .signature,v 1.13 2003/06/17 10:29:24 sam Exp $
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
I write).
cheers,
--
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369
$superduper: .signature,v 1.13 2003/06/17 10:29:24 sam Exp $
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
rror 1
Oops, looks like i missed a build-depend. Will fix ASAP.
--
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369
$superduper: .signature,v 1.13 2003/06/17 10:29:24 sam Exp $
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
I saw the same issue.
Seems to be related to avahi-daemon. I stopped it and banshee started
just fine. Strangly, once I started it again banshee was still able
to start, so perhaps this is a workaround. Shame I can no longer
reproduce it though :(
sam
--
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED
n the
archives.
cheers,
sam
--
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369
$superduper: .signature,v 1.14 2005/01/19 13:21:14 sam Exp $
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Simpson
Al. Foo
35
Al.Bar
14
Simpson, Homer
35, Al. Foo
14, Al.Bar
What is the output you get from running this?
--
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369
$superduper: .signature,v 1.14 2005/01/19 13:21:14 sam Exp $
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mirco Bauer wrote:
> Package: boo
> Severity: serious
>
> The included boo.pc in 0.5.6.1701-1 has an invalid prefix, it's set
> to /usr/local which should be /usr.
> This breaks compiling programs against boo (like MonoDevelop).
>
Thanks. Will fix ASAP.
sam
--
sam
ll" rather than list everything in debian/install.
--
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369
$superduper: .signature,v 1.14 2005/01/19 13:21:14 sam Exp $
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
patch. I just uploaded a new version that build-depends
on fastjar. However I was assuming that fastjar provided the 'jar'
command. Looks like i'll still need anther upload that uses the
fastjar command explicitly.
cheers,
sam
--
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superdupe
oguard
> cp: cannot stat `./lib/proguard.jar': No such file or directory
> dh_install: command returned error code 256
> make: *** [binary-install/proguard] Error 1
>
>
I think this was fixed in an upload I made this morning.
--
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superd
t should have
> been 0.15.1b since the API was extended in 0.15.1b.
>
> Is that something that should get fixed in sarge?
>
>
> Kurt
Sorry kurt, i've been away for a few days in Paris (should have
notified debian, i know). Will do the upload today.
sam
--
sam clegg
17 matches
Mail list logo
