Ian Campbell writes:
> On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 03:07 +, Wookey wrote:
>
>> End of the build log at:
>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=linux&arch=armel&ver=3.13.4-1&stamp=1393291598
>
>> some modules are in more than one package
>> debian/jffs2-modules-3.13-1-orion5x-di
>> lib/m
Aurelien Jarno writes:
> Hi all,
Hi,
>
> I have made some progress on this bug, though it has not progress in the
> expected direction. In other words I got some surprises.
>
> First of all it the bug has been introduced in binutils when introducing
> the MIPS PLT support [1] (commits around 200
Dirk Eddelbuettel writes:
Hi,
> On 2 August 2010 at 10:20, Arnaud Patard (Rtp) wrote:
> | Dirk Eddelbuettel writes:
> |
> | Hi,
> |
> |
> | > | > (the failing program is attached). It seems that r-base hit bug
> | > | > #519006 (see [1]). It's
Dirk Eddelbuettel writes:
Hi,
> | > (the failing program is attached). It seems that r-base hit bug
> | > #519006 (see [1]). It's a bug in gcc-4.4, and it's unlikely that
> | > Tcl/Tk itself can do something to it.
> |
> | yeah, r-base is hitting this bug. As a _workaround_, you can patch the
Sergei Golovan writes:
Hi,
> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Shane McDonald
> wrote:
>>
>> Mips and mipsel definitely have Tcl/Tk.
>>
>> Investigating a little further, I tried building rcmdr on a mipsel
>> system with tcl8.5 and tk8.5 present, but it still gave the same
>> errors that you saw.
Matthias Klose writes:
> On 09.06.2010 12:02, Arnaud Patard (Rtp) wrote:
>> Matthias Klose writes:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> On 08.06.2010 20:02, Bdale Garbee wrote:
>>>> This prevents dump from building on mips/mipsel, which means the version
&
Matthias Klose writes:
Hi,
> On 08.06.2010 20:02, Bdale Garbee wrote:
>> This prevents dump from building on mips/mipsel, which means the version
>> of dump in testing is now months out of date.
>>
>> Is there an estimate for when this bug will be fixed?
>
> this is up to the debian-mips maintai
Roger Leigh writes:
Hi,
> Could the Debian ARM list/porters possibly comment upon this
> bug? Please could you keep buildd-tools-devel and the bug
> in the CC on any reply. Thanks.
>
> It's not clear to me why this bug has suddenly appeared, and
> only on armel. There seem to be a few possibi
Reinhard Tartler writes:
Hi,
> Package: ams
> Severity: serious
>
> relevant log:
>
> g++ -D_REENTRANT -DLADSPA_PATH=\"/usr/lib/ladspa:/usr/local/lib/ladspa\"
> -DTRANSLATIONSDIR=\"/usr/share/ams/translations\" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
> -DQT_SHARED -I/usr/include/qt4 -I/usr/include/qt4/QtCore
Hi,
I've just got this bug too. The problem is caused by this line :
etex -ini -jobname=jadetex -progname=jadetex &latex jadetex.ini
[ iirc, this line comes from the parsing of the
/etc/texmf/fmt.d/40jadetex.cnf. ]
This line is interpreted by the shell as the following two lines :
$ etex -i
10 matches
Mail list logo
