It's been a week an no new upstream release. The patches required seem
lightweight. Would it be possible to release a new Debian version
while we wait for upstream?
Hi Leopold,
did you have a chance to run the commands requested by Aurelien? This
bug is marked critical, but has been stale for more than a month, now.
Thanks,
Richard
Control: severity -1 critical
Control: affects -1 docutils-common
This affects several packages, thus the severity change.
# dpkg --configure -a
Setting up docutils-common (0.12+dfsg-2) ...
Unknown option: sort
Usage:
update-xmlcatalog --add --root --type \
And uploaded.
I will package that soon(tm), maybe tonight. Sorry for missing that.
Richard
Sent by mobile; excuse my brevity.
Jftr, if I can help with a new package or build, do let me know.
Richard
Sent by mobile; excuse my brevity.
Package: git-annex
Version: 5.20150812-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Uploaded a new and fixed version without knowing about the removal and it
happened just before the upload. Bad timing, but git-annex will re-enter
sid, at least.
Richard
Sent by mobile; excuse my brevity.
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Richard Hartmann
wrote:
> Should I simply attach the whole file, grep something out, or send it
> to you off-list?
Sent off-list, if anyone else needs it poke me.
--
Richard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a s
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> I don't think that debconf is relevant there. The problem is that the
> new python needs a new libc6 package, and thus if it is unpacked before
> libc6, it doesn't work anymore. This means that every python script on
> the system will fail
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 5:15 PM, David Kalnischkies
wrote:
> I haven't had the time yet to debug why APT is choosing this route
> (and as said, dpkg/status file would help), but while this might not be
> ideal its not a bug in APT.
Should I simply attach the whole file, grep something out, or se
Package: upgrade-reports
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Broken Python upgrade left me without working debconf.
Full log at http://paste.debian.net/5060/
Fixed by manually installing libc6 packages and locales*.deb
Fetched 520 MB in 21min 17s (407 kB/s)
Reading chang
As per IRC, I submitted a bug with an attached patch for release-notes.
It documents the possible workaround of adding both squeeze and wheezy
sources to sources.list.
Please see #706684 [1] for details.
--
Richard
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706684
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Hi Luca,
when are you planning to upload your new package? Release is targeted
for tomorrow and gcc-msp430 still needs to be unblocked.
--
Richard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi Andreas,
as you referenced #645713 directly you probably tried this already,
but does adding the wheezy sources to sources.list instead of
replacing the squeeze ones help?
--
Richard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
Package: update-notifier-common
Version: 0.99.3debian10
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5
Recommends: libpam-modules (>= 1.0.1-9ubuntu3)
Even though there's no actual impact as 1.1.3-7.1 >> 1.0.1-9ubuntu3,
update-notifier-common still should not recommend an Ubuntu version of
libpam-mod
Package: update-notifier-common
Version: 0.99.3debian10
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5
If lsb-release is not installed, /usr/lib/update-notifier/apt_check.py
will crap out:
# /usr/lib/update-notifier/apt_check.py
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/update-notifier/apt
Quoting issue in postinst script.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Strange.
Settings:
* dpkg-reconfigure lightdm
-> lightdm
* dpkg-reconfigure lightdm-qt-greeter
-> lightdm-qt-greeter
* dpkg-reconfigure lightdm-gtk-greeter
-> lightdm-qt-greeter
Yet, it will still start lightdm-gtk-greeter, not the qt variant.
To test, I removed lightdm-gtk-greeter from my
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 07:33, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Can you check what is the currently selected greeter
> in /etc/lightdm/lightdm.conf (greeter-session).
It's set to gtk atm. I know because qt did not work, I installed gtk
to try an alternative, that worked and I reported the bug.
I will
Package: lightdm-qt-greeter
Version: 1.0.9-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
On a bare system with almost no packages installed, I decided to try out
lightdm.
apt-get install lightdm lightdm-qt-greeter
will lead to a system without working X login.
apt-get insta
Package: zsh
Version: 4.3.11-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Rationale: zsh-static is a shell used for root and in fall-back
scenarios. As it does not work at all, this can make system maintenance
or repairing this hard to impossible.
% zsh-static -f
zsh-static: ../sysde
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 00:09, Christian Kastner wrote:
> There seems to be a misunderstanding here.
Indeed. Sorry & thanks for the clarification.
> [1] http://trac.aircrack-ng.org/ticket/764#comment:2
On to the next round. Yay?
Richard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...
According to Mister_X in #aircrack-ng on freenode, aircrack-ng never
took any code from Pyrite, it was the other way round. Closing.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re-re-re-poking them.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Tags: moreinfo
thanks
Unless you provide a lot more info, no one will be able to help you.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 17:00, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Alvaro confirmed GPL:
If he is OK with both 2 & 3, can you ask him if GPL 2+ is OK, as well?
Thanks,
Richard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 19:40, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> I've contacted the authors.
Sorry, I was on the road; just came back and am churning through email
atm.
Did you reach anyone? I poked repeatedly, but did not get a reply.
Thanks for not forgetting this and sorry that I did not get any
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 17:26, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Any news on that?
I gave up poking at some point. Let me renew that effort :)
Thanks for reminding me!
Richard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact list
I just made aircrack-ng aware of the updates, let's see if we can
squash one more RC bug :)
Richard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi all,
I am following up a licence issue with "Lament for Lost Dreams"
by mind.in.a.box.
As described in [1] [2], said sound clip lacks a licence compatible
to Debian.
While there is a claim on Debian's bug tracker that the snippet
has been released under an additional licence, it's not clear w
Comment from Munich's BSP 2010:
As kupfer Recommends python-gnome2 already, it would not be too
much overhead to Recommend python-keyring-gnome as well.
The final decision is up to the maintainer of course, but we would
tend to Recommend python-keyring-gnome for the obvious
benefit in user securi
upstream
The authors are:
// SHA-1 SSE2 implementation, (C) 2008 Alvaro Salmador
(napla...@msn.com), ported from Simon Marechal's SHA-1 MMX
// SHA-1 MMX implementation, (C) 2005 Simon Marechal (si...@banquise.net)
Missing licence has been forwarded to upstream, see [1]
for details
Richard
[1]
Hi Petter,
I suggest you add a short comment to your fix. The reasoning
behind it will be lost at some point. And while it's certainly
possible to trace the reasoning behind it down, it would be
easier to just toss a short comment into the code
Thanks,
Richard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 13:40, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> I will upload fixes for the licensing bug tonight.
OK, thanks.
I'll check on it tomorrow and NMU if need be.
Richard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Any update? Top-posting in to make relating easier.
RIchard
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:53, Richard Hartmann
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 05:39, Peter Clifton wrote:
>
>> There were some patches ready to push the license fix, but Richard, who
>> did those is holding off a
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 05:39, Peter Clifton wrote:
> There were some patches ready to push the license fix, but Richard, who
> did those is holding off as I mentioned that Hamish promised 1.4.3
> packages whilst he was at LCA. In any case.. we might be forced just to
> have the licence fix, rath
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:04, Didier Raboud wrote:
> it seems that you tagged 510992 with "patch" 7 times… You additionnally need
> to
> attach your patch so that other can review it !
Argh, I wanted to tag every single bug in the family with, not one seven times..
Sorry about that. The patch
Full quote for completeness:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 16:10, Peter Clifton wrote:
> Yes, sorry for those... I hope the priority was appropriate. Hamish
> asked me to file a bug to remind him about the licensing issue, and
> since it was in all of those packages, I basically duplicated the same
>
For completeness
-- Forwarded message --
From: Peter TB Brett
Date: Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:11
Subject: Re: gEDA-dev: Licensing question regarding libgeda
To: gEDA developer mailing list
On Tuesday 13 January 2009 11:03:27 Richard Hartmann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am
Long story short: It's GPLv2. Expect a patch from me shortly.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ales Hvezda
Date: Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:10
Subject: Re: gEDA-dev: Licensing question regarding libgeda
To: gEDA developer mailing list
[snip]
>I am trying to track down the exact lic
Hi all,
I am trying to track down the exact licensing of libgeda. Asking the
people who wrote it is usually a good way to be sure, so here goes :)
Is libgeda under GPL v2 or LGPL v2? The copyright file in Debian claims
LGPL while the geda website claims GPL.
As a definite & authorative answer t
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 14:04, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> Well, restricting it to all the 32bit archs, presumably. I don't think
> that's necessarily a problem given it's not been released on other archs
> yet, so it's not a regression. I definitely think that at this point the
> options are 'drop
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 02:36, James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you have a way to reproduce this in a clean environment? I've tried
> various upgrade paths, starting from an Etch system and hitting all the
> packages that had changes related to this. I'm unable to reproduce it.
I remo
This works, though:
adamantium /home/richih # apt-get remove vim-runtime vim vim-gnome
vim-full vim-vimoutliner
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Package vim-full is not installed, so not removed
The following packages were automatically insta
Package: vim-runtime
Version: 1:7.1.314-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Upgrading failed. See below for what I tried to do to fix this:
adamantium /home/richih # apt-get install -f
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
C
Package: love
Version: 0.4.0-2
Severity: critical
When I start love, drag the balls around a little bit and then alt-tab
out of love, I have lost all keyboard input. I can't type or anything.
It's not even possible to ctrl-alt-bksp X.
Also, while I can still move the mouse, all click events are st
Package: stormbaancoureur
Version: 2.1.5-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I got an error regarding a missing so file. Updating plib1.8.4c2 to 1.8.4-9
fixed this.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Arc
On Feb 16, 2008 7:11 AM, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brian Redfern is working on some free music to replace the non-free
> music[1]. His latest attempt is OK, but doesn't suit the game as much as
> the originals. He is working on some new versions that are more like the
> originals.
D
Package: esniper
Version: 2.17.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
esniper can not connect to the SSL/TLS secured ebay login page without
the ability to check the server's certificate. For this, ca-certificates
MUST be installed.
Fix: Depend on ca-certificates
-- System I
Package: linux-image-2.6-k7
Version: 2.6.22+9
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
This makes an automagic {dist-,}upgrade of the kernel impossible, manual
interaction is required.
--- control 2007-10-29 09:11:57.081426888 +0100
+++ control22007-10-29 09:1
Is there any progress on this bug? Is has been almost a month and,
at least to me as an outsider, the fix in the form of the patch from
July 18th seems to be doing the trick and to be rather trivial to
implement.
Richard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
Is anyone aware of a working fallback configuration which people
tracking this bug can use?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
thanks for providing Debian to all who read this :)
Richard Hartmann
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
54 matches
Mail list logo
