severity -1 minor
Dear Richard,
* Richard Z [2022-05-05 22:24:21 CEST]:
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> installed the beep package and tried beep without any arguments and it does
> not
> work.
>
> $ BEEP_LOG_LEVEL=999 beep
> beep-log: Verbose: log_constructor
> beep-log: Verbose: beep_driver_console
tags 1009420 + patch
thanks
Hi,
given the potential autoremoval of irssi we looked into this, irssi
upstream suggested the attached patch which I can confirm to fix the
build.
Cheers,
Rhonda
--
Fühlst du dich mutlos, fass endlich Mut, los |
Fühlst du dich hilflos, geh raus und hilf,
k fix for my case, I'm uncertain if it might
>> appear to others in other ways, but this clearly goes against the
>> principle of robustness.
>>
>> Upstream is at 3.6 in the meantime, I'm willing to update it now that I
>> digged a bit further into it. If I
willing to update it now that I
digged a bit further into it. If I don't hear back in the next few days
I propose an NMU for it, as thanks for having it around in the first
place. :)
Enjoy,
Rhonda [happy again]
* Rhonda D'Vine [2022-03-08 16:19:46 CET]:
>Hi,
>
> I ma
Hi,
I managed to find the culprit With A Little Help From My Friends[tm]. I
used Data::Dumper before the content got passed to XML::Parser, and it
turned out that there is an Escape character (0x1b, ^[) in a comment
field.
kpcli seems to have accepted this when the comment was pasted and
sto
Package: kpcli
Version: 3.1-3.1
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream
Justification: causes serious data loss
Dear Maintainer,
I store my passwords in a keepass file that I exclusively use through kpcli.
After the last kernel upgrade reboot I was unable to open the file anymore, and
thus can't access my
Dear Lee,
* Lee Garrett [2022-02-09 18:27:38 CET]:
> Package: tetradraw
> Version: 2.0.3-9+b2
> Followup-For: Bug #716386
> X-Debbugs-Cc: deb...@rocketjump.eu
>
> Hi Rhonda,
>
> sorry to grave dig this bug report, but it seems that tetradraw might be
> broken
> for a couple of releases now
.
> > License: GPL-2+
> >
> > Files: misc.c
> > Copyright: Jaakko Heinonen
> > 1994 Lars Wirzenius
> > Comment: BSD-2-clause covers the getaline() function.
> > License: GPL-2+ and BSD-2-clause
> >
> > Files: missing
>
* Bastian Germann [2021-10-07 11:59:24 CEST]:
> Can you please take a look at #995843 which I think is a Policy violation by
> abook not including all distribution licenses in the copyright file. The
> package maintainer does not think so and claims that only including the main
> license (GPL-2+)
* Bastian Germann [2021-10-07 11:00:28 CEST]:
> Am 07.10.21 um 10:55 schrieb Rhonda D'Vine:
> > I think you misunderstand how the GPL works. The GPL is known to be
> > viral, and licenses compatible with the GPL are indeed compatible with
> > it because they allow t
Severity: -1 minor
* Bastian Germann [2021-10-07 00:31:00 CEST]:
> abook contains distribution licenses that are not copied to
> debian/copyright. At least BSD-2-clause (xmalloc.c, misc.c), old-style
> MIT (ldif.c), FSFULLR (configure, Makefile.in), X11 (install-sh), and
> probably others.
I th
Hi again.
* Bastian Germann [2021-10-06 23:58:41 CEST]:
> Am 06.10.21 um 21:34 schrieb Rhonda D'Vine:
> > Are you reading the debian/copyright file correct? Yes, it says
> > "License: GPL-2" but AIUI that is just a reference indicator, and the
> > long
Severity: wishlist
* Bastian Germann [2021-10-06 19:38:07 CEST]:
> Severity: serious
Please don't severity bump this, specifically since I don't see how you
want to justify it.
> On Sat, 2 Jan 2021 18:46:04 +0100 Bastian Germann
> wrote:
> > Package: abook
> > Severity: important
> >
> > Th
t; + libboost-random-dev, libpng-dev, libreadline-dev, libwolfssl-dev,
>libpango1.0-dev, libvorbis-dev, cmake (>= 2.6)
> Standards-Version: 4.1.4
> Uploaders: Rhonda D'Vine ,
> diff --git a/debian/patches/01wolfssl-crypto b/debian/patches/01wolfssl-crypto
> new file mo
severity 930072 important
thanks
Hi,
On 6/12/19 10:35 PM, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 04:04:39PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
>> Package: dctrl-tools
>> Version: 2.24-3
>> Severity: serious
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> The join-dctrl command segfaults with the attached files.
>>
>> ,--
Hi!
On 2/27/19 8:52 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I'm just pinging both RC bugs to reset the autoremoval from testing
> counter. I just realised that the package might not migrate to testing
> due to a missing arm64 build. I leave it to you to decide about the
> action to take but just wanted to
Control: tag -1 - upstream
Control: severity -1 normal
Hi.
On 2/19/19 6:46 AM, jim_p wrote:
> After today's upgrade to version 1.4.x, beep no longer works and pops the
> above
> error. After checking its man page, I found out that it tries to access these
> devices, in that specific order
>
Hey,
On 2/14/19 3:24 PM, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> On woensdag 13 februari 2019 15:51:04 CET you wrote:
>> #922145: irssi: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/irssi/help/otr', which is
>> also in package irssi-plugin-otr
>>
>> It has been closed by Rhonda D&
Hi,
you are right, but: This issue exists only with upgrade from the broken
1.2.0-1 package. Which isn't available anymore, it was there for way
less than a day. I am much more leaning towards a "wontfix" than doing
the Replaces & Conflicts dance and carry that for ... when would then be
p
Hi!
On 2/12/19 5:25 PM, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> Got an update for version 1.2.0-1, but I also have irssi-plugin-otr
> installed, which resulted in the following upgrade error:
>
> # aptitude safe-upgrade
> The following packages will be upgraded:
> bind9-host dnsutils irssi irssi-plugin-
Hey,
* Pirate Praveen [2018-12-18 09:34:46 CET]:
> On 12/3/18 8:11 PM, Dominik George wrote:
> >> well, Debian is using gitlab!!! so this sentence has no sense. The
> >> problem here
> >> is that is a complex software that depends of a lot of pieces and it's
> >> not
> >> easy/possible to fit
So people are falling for a fake page that is not even well disguised, apply a
patch from there and now worry about being exploited? Call me unimpressed, but
what is expected to be done about that?
Please, only get your patches through trusted sources, not from windy websites
that just look
Hi,
* Andreas Beckmann [2017-03-16 20:48:35 CET]:
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package is no longer
> installable in sid:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> tworld : Depends: tworld-data (= 1.3.2-2+b1) but 1.3.2-2 is to be installed
>
> This dependency i
Hey Kristian,
are you willing to prepare an NMU for stable, too? This also affects
the package in jessie obviously. :)
Thanks,
Rhonda
* Kristian Klausen [2016-05-14 12:00:14 CEST]:
> Closes: 816848 818540 823005
> Changes:
> pepperflashplugin-nonfree (1.8.2+nmu1) unstable; urgency=med
Hey,
* Jens Reyer [2016-02-09 19:49:43 CET]:
> In Wine we depend on libwine-gecko-xxx before it's added to the archive,
> knowing/hoping/assuming that it will be added to the archive, which has
> always been true for Debian stable releases, but not for all
> intermittent Gecko versions that we
Hi,
* Austin English [2016-02-09 17:45:02 CET]:
> On Feb 9, 2016 8:39 PM, austinengl...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Feb 9, 2016 8:25 PM, "Rhonda D'Vine" wrote:
> > > > > Hi!
> > > > >
> > > > > * Ralf Jung [2016-01-26
* Austin English [2016-02-09 17:19:30 CET]:
> On Feb 9, 2016 8:15 PM, "Rhonda D'Vine" wrote:
> > severity 812750 serious
> > thanks
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > * Ralf Jung [2016-01-26 10:57:49 CET]:
> > > From all I can tell, the Gec
* Ondřej Surý [2015-09-03 15:27:50 CEST]:
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015, at 15:21, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> > I noticed that you applied this patch in unstable closing #797470, but
> > then you reopened it. Does that mean that the patch is not enough?
>
> Nope, I think the patch is enough. I reopened,
* Dominik George [2015-10-12 15:03:06 CEST]:
> Am Montag, 12. Oktober 2015, 15:54:45 schrieb Konstantin Khomoutov:
> > While I'm dissatisfied, to put it mildly, with what the submitter wrote
> > in this bug report regarding me being «unable to respond to any
> > requests»,
>
> Quoting, to make i
reopen 796953
Hi!
* Julien Aubin [2015-08-26 10:07:58 CEST]:
> Source: fglrx-driver
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
>
> Hello,
>
> Update 4.1 of the Linux kernel has been released in Jessie backports. The
> problem is that the fglrx driver did not follow, cau
Hi!
I've noticed this unfortunately only after the release of jessie that
the package got removed because of this ... :/
* Hideki Yamane [2014-02-03 14:18:53 CET]:
> This is apparently bug in configure(.in), and fixed in new upstream
> version 1.4.6.
> see http://pessimization.com/soft
31 matches
Mail list logo
