Bug#342545: [patch/hppa] Floating point exception handling patch

2006-01-15 Thread Randolph Chung
im to merge this upstream when he returns, meanwhile perhaps somebody can roll a new glibc package for debian? randolph #! /bin/sh -e # DP: Description: hppa floating point exception handling fix # DP: Related bugs: Debian #342545 # DP: Dpatch author: Randolph Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Bug#341174: boost FTBFS on hppa

2005-12-20 Thread Randolph Chung
ry with -mlong-calls (instead of -ffunction-sections) These are obviously all workarounds until we fix the real problem. randolph -- Randolph Chung Debian GNU/Linux Developer, hppa/ia64 ports http://www.tausq.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "uns

Bug#341174: boost FTBFS on hppa

2005-12-18 Thread Randolph Chung
es its calculations do not match what binutils calculates. randolph -- Randolph Chung Debian GNU/Linux Developer, hppa/ia64 ports http://www.tausq.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#333766: libc6: SIGBUS in libm on hppa breaks qt-x11-free

2005-10-13 Thread Randolph Chung
I don't think that's what is happening at all: I think that in one of these cases, your test file's on-stack fenv_t is aligned, and on the other it isn't. The code you posted for gcc 4.0 looks fine. I think the assembly is broken or the definition of fenv_t. drow is right, as usual. our fenv_t

Bug#321785: fakeroot: segfaults on [hppa]

2005-08-12 Thread Randolph Chung
ndolph -- Randolph Chung Debian GNU/Linux Developer, hppa/ia64 ports http://www.tausq.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#321785: fakeroot: segfaults on [hppa]

2005-08-12 Thread Randolph Chung
(I trimmed the cc list a bit) Dave, Could this actually be a gcc problem? Take a look at this: (gdb) bt #0 0x406dbd20 in __canonicalize_funcptr_for_compare () from /usr/lib/debug/libpthread.so.0 #1 0x406d7424 in __pthread_sigaction (sig=18, act=0xc0241ec8, oact=0xc0241f50) at signal

Bug#321785: fakeroot: segfaults on [hppa]

2005-08-12 Thread Randolph Chung
> Well, sarge also shipped as 2.6-only, for hppa; so if the answer is that > this problem happens to go away when upgrading to 2.6, that's probably > acceptable, since 2.4 kernels will have been unsupported on hppa for a full > stable release by the time etch comes out. It doesn't go away with 2.6

Bug#321785: fakeroot: segfaults on [hppa]

2005-08-10 Thread Randolph Chung
Confirmed. We are passing a function pointer with a value of -2 into __cffc, which should not happen... Is -2 a special signal number? I don't think so. in any case, others have observed that if they use an older glibc, this problem does not happen. randolph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [

Bug#321785: fakeroot: segfaults on [hppa]

2005-08-10 Thread Randolph Chung
ied Dave and Carlos in case they don't read these lists. Dave and Carlos, this is a problem with the new glibc in Debian unstable. looks like any app that links libpthread will segfault. randolph -- Randolph Chung Debian GNU/Linux Developer, hppa/ia64 ports http://www.tausq.org/ -- To UNSU