Bug#1101694: gjs: test failures on big-endian

2025-05-06 Thread Pranav P
Hi Jeremy, Sorry to hear that. I will have to come up with a fix for the `Regress` test failure also. Thanks, Pranav From: Jeremy BĂ­cha Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2025 4:01 AM To: Pranav P Cc: Berli Gayathri; 1101...@bugs.debian.org; debian-s390 Subject

Bug#1101694: gjs: test failures on big-endian

2025-05-02 Thread Pranav P
Hi Jeremy, It seems like when `simple_setters_caller` calls `simple_setter_caller` this function calls `gi_marshalling_tests_properties_accessors_object_set_flags` with `arg->v_pointer` as the `some_flags` where `some_flags` is an `enum` and arg->v_pointer is of `void*` (Actually it's a gpoint

Bug#1103593: python-djvulibre: autopkgtest regression on s390x

2025-04-27 Thread Pranav P
Thanks a lot Colin From: Colin Watson Sent: Monday, April 28, 2025 5:05 AM To: Pranav P; 1103...@bugs.debian.org Cc: Chris Hofstaedtler; debian-s390 Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Bug#1103593: python-djvulibre: autopkgtest regression on s390x On Wed, Apr 23

Bug#1103595: Bug#1103423: src:kitty: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x

2025-04-24 Thread Pranav P
Hi Paul, I will continue looking into this bug and will see if I can come up with something. Thank you all for your support. Thanks, Pranav From: Paul Gevers Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2025 11:41 AM To: 1103...@bugs.debian.org; Pranav P Cc: 1103

Bug#1103593: python-djvulibre: autopkgtest regression on s390x

2025-04-23 Thread Pranav P
Hi Chris, Thanks for reporting this and I would love to look into this. I am actually working on a few other bugs as well. I will try to check this one in parallel. Please give me some time. Thanks, Pranav From: Chris Hofstaedtler Sent: Saturday, April 1

Bug#1103595: kitty: FTBFS on s390x: test failures

2025-04-22 Thread Pranav P
Hi Chris, I am taking a look at this bug and I am able to reproduce the issue with sbuild. I will update any findings in mailing list. Thanks a lot, Pranav From: Chris Hofstaedtler Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2025 5:50 PM To: Debian Bug Tracking System Sub

Bug#1102106: git ftbfs on s390x (test failures)

2025-04-22 Thread Pranav P
Hi, I had written to the community. Seems like they already have a more versatile fix. The fix has already been merged to `next`. I am providing the reply I received. https://lore.kernel.org/git/aaefbu-mmy_73...@pks.im/ Thanks, Pranav From: Pranav P

Bug#1102106: git ftbfs on s390x (test failures)

2025-04-22 Thread Pranav P
So, I was checking if there is any evidence that indicates a potential range for min_batch_size. I was also planning to ping with the upstream community for clarification. Thanks, Pranav From: Pranav P Sent: Monday, April 21, 2025 10:08 AM To: Bastian Blank ; de

Bug#1102106: git ftbfs on s390x (test failures)

2025-04-20 Thread Pranav P
Hi, I was able to reproduce the issue. I will update all of my findings in the mailing list. Thanks, Pranav From: Bastian Blank Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2025 4:45 PM To: debian-s390 ; 1102...@bugs.debian.org <1102...@bugs.debian.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: git

Bug#1102693: src:frr: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x

2025-04-15 Thread Pranav P
Hi, Looks like https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/pull/18662/commits/da8fce3830baa2fd4d70050a3f7677d6e8bd5ad4 by Mark is fixing the issue. But it's still waiting to be merged. Thanks, Pranav

Bug#1099935: dnspython: autopkgtest regression on s390x: bad request

2025-03-20 Thread Pranav P
I am extremely sorry. I raised the PR in ls-qpack's repo at https://github.com/litespeedtech/ls-qpack/pull/76 Thanks Pranav From: Colin Watson Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2025 6:19 PM To: Pranav P Cc: 1099935 <1099...@bugs.debian.org>; elbrus ;

Bug#1099935: dnspython: autopkgtest regression on s390x: bad request

2025-03-20 Thread Pranav P
Hi Colin, Thanks a lot. I raised an issue with a suggested fix on pylsqpack's github repo and has asked them how they want to integrate the changes. I will also raise a PR to ls-qpack's repo. Meanwhile, I am attaching the patch with a commit message generated via quilt. I am new to the communit

Bug#1099935: dnspython: autopkgtest regression on s390x: bad request

2025-03-19 Thread Pranav P
pack is compiling without passing any -std flags which defaults to gnu standards). Thank you From: Colin Watson Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2025 12:11 AM To: Pranav P ; 1099...@bugs.debian.org <1099...@bugs.debian.org> Cc: Paul Gevers ; debian-s...@lis

Bug#1099935: dnspython: autopkgtest regression on s390x: bad request

2025-03-16 Thread Pranav P
this results in a bad request. I am not able to see the same issue on ls-qpack though. I will update any new findings. Thanks, Pranav From: Pranav P Sent: Monday, March 10, 2025 10:11 AM To: sub...@bugs.debian.org ; Paul Gevers ; 1099...@bugs.debian.org <1

Bug#1099935: dnspython: autopkgtest regression on s390x: bad request

2025-03-09 Thread Pranav P
Hi Paul, I have been looking at this issue for the past few days. Thanks for this valuable information. When run parallelly on an x86 machine and an s390x machine I was able to see that an encoding to byte string varied at an encode function call from pylsqpack. Since it was a wrapper to a C fu