Package: chromium
Version: 84.0.4147.105-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team
Versions in Debian, even that in experimental have 100+ open unfixed CVE listed
in the tracker.
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-packag
Package: matrix-synapse
Version: 0.99.2-2
Followup-For: Bug #920339
Still exists in the recent version. It seems that the server is spawned and
disowned, and the configure script waits forever for some return value which
never
comes.
Also this output is not really happy:
Setting up matrix-sy
works for me. unfortunately I don't see anything in your traces
either, but it's not a general problem with the release.
g
Hello,
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 5:42 PM, Joachim Falk wrote:
> I have a fix for this and many other minor things. Can you test
> an RC for tigervnc 1.7.0+dfsg-2? Find the debs under
Looks ok for me.
(As a sidenote plain tigervncserver calls /etc/X11/Xvnc-session calls
Xsession which doesn't seem
Package: shadowsocks
Version: 2.9.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
(If you believe this is libssl1.1 bug feel free to reassign.)
The program simply won't start in sid:
INFO: loading config from /etc/shadowsocks/config.json
2016-11-19 15:20:09 INFO loading libcrypto
Package: flashplugin-nonfree
Version: 1:3.6.1+b1
Followup-For: Bug #820583
And again. This time, however, this is a major update, which may or may not
justify some delay,
but still the install re-downloads the same version happily and makes no noise
about it.
This should be fixed; either don't
Package: geneweb
Version: 6.08dfsg-3.1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Build fails with
iconv: conversion from `Binary' is not supported
on ca language file. The problem is that grep matches the file as binary, and
output
Indeed the problem could be band-aided by inserting
--- /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/taskcoachlib/application/application.py~
2014-08-03 15:51:09.0 +0200
+++ /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/taskcoachlib/application/application.py
2014-10-10 23:14:31.482657257 +0200
@@ -83,6 +83,9
Package: taskcoach
Version: 1.4.1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The last update wasn't that successful. :-(
$ taskcoach
(taskcoach:9934): Gtk-CRITICAL **: IA__gtk_widget_set_size_request: assertion
'height >= -1' failed
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/us
But it still chokes on anything in color:
D [22/Dec/2010:15:24:09 +0100] [Job 1700] sfopen: gs_parse_file_name failed.
D [22/Dec/2010:15:24:09 +0100] [Job 1700] sfopen: gs_parse_file_name failed.
D [22/Dec/2010:15:24:09 +0100] [Job 1700] ./base/gsicc_manage.c:709:
gsicc_open_search(): Could not fi
Found: 9.00~dfsg-2~0jones1
> You posted above to my personal email address.
Yes.
> Please repost to the bugreport - and only there. Thanks.
I will not post publicly private data, sorry.
But I'll send a mail that it's still won't work if you insist, without
the attachments.
Peter
--
To UNS
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 13:21, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>> yeh the bug's still present,
>>
>> Still present where? With which version of ghostscript did you test?
>
> It would still be useful if you could answer above - even if you cannot test
> any further with different versions of ghostscript.
> Still present where? With which version of ghostscript did you test?
Latest and greatest sid versions.
> Please try test that newer ghostscript package and report back if you
> can confirm that it works properly now.
Fail. Follows below the exact versions:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT pr
yeh the bug's still present, and isn't it the same as bug #569580 ?
--
byte-byte,
grin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
log 2009-08-14 00:28:29.0 +0200
+++ dhis-server-5.3.new/debian/changelog 2009-08-13 23:55:04.402948447 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+dhis-server (5.3-1.2.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Hack included to handle v5.5 client echos
+
+ -- Peter Gervai Thu, 13 Aug 2009 23
Hmm,
Client seems not to reply CHECK_REQ and server doesn't seem to care
about ECHO_*, and this combination seems not to work.
--
byte-byte,
grin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 14:51:03 -0400
grok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am getting this crash pretty regularly now when I start shuffling
> around the 'snapshot' URLs (they've already been moved away from where
> elinks puts them as per the configuration setting, so they should just
> be 'regular'
Hello Steve,
On Sat, 21 May 2005 03:10:19 -0700
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Timo Lindfors has pointed out to me on IRC that this is a duplicate of bug
> #300889, which was fixed upstream in 0.10.4. That version hasn't reached
> testing yet, though, because there have been 6 new u
Whatever, he's right, it's ugly. I'll do some sanity
checking, it's not a big deal.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Blars^2[on],
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 03:27:26 -0700
Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This bug still happens building 0.10.4-2 on a sparc pbuilder.
Yes, sorry, a fix that a fellow non-linux debian user created
tricks me all the time. -3 should have fixed it for good, it's
in the incom
acknowledged.
peter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 03:27:44 +0200
Florian Zumbiehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > links-ssl package was *removed* from Debian in june, 2004.
>
> Nope, links-ssl is still part of woody:
>
> http://packages.debian.org/stable/non-US/links-ssl
>
> > links and elinks (and links2 by the way)
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 22:08:34 +0100
Esteban Manchado Velázquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello:
>
>Does upstream know this?
links-ssl was removed from Debian since Mon, 21 Jun 2004.
>Is anyone working on this bug?
Not likely.
Peter
ps: Neither links nor elinks seem to have this "b
23 matches
Mail list logo
