Bug#897945: [Openjdk] Bug#920037: Bug#897945: #897945 still present/breaks with Java 8

2019-02-05 Thread Per Lundberg
On 2/4/19 10:07 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > What is the specific use case for this, is there some package which > needs 8 and can't be fixed in time for 11? Yes, it was stated in this thread earlier that such packages do exist. Emmanuel/others, is this the correct list of packages which can o

Bug#897945: [Openjdk] Bug#920037: Bug#897945: #897945 still present/breaks with Java 8

2019-02-04 Thread Per Lundberg
On 2/1/19 11:20 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 01.02.19 10:03, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: >> This is an excellent suggestion. We should file a bug for openjdk-8 to >> implement that. > please attach the patch. Sure, I should be able to write something up. Forbear my ignorance: should I use debconf to

Bug#897945: #897945 still present/breaks with Java 8

2019-02-01 Thread Per Lundberg
On 1/29/19 3:36 PM, Markus Koschany wrote: > We usually ship only with one JDK per release because of security > support. OpenJDK 8 will be EOL before the end of the Debian 10 release > cycle. We still have a couple of packages that will not compile with > OpenJDK 11 hence we also thought about sh

Bug#897945: #897945 still present/breaks with Java 8

2019-01-29 Thread Per Lundberg
Hi Markus, On 1/29/19 1:32 PM, Markus Koschany wrote: > >> I am sorry but OpenJDK 8 will not be supported at runtime in >> Buster. Another question: if this is the case, should the openjdk-8-jdk package (and friends) be removed altogether in sid? I looked briefly but couldn't find any bugs ment

Bug#897945: #897945 still present/breaks with Java 8

2019-01-29 Thread Per Lundberg
On 1/29/19 1:32 PM, Markus Koschany wrote: Hi Markus and Emmanuel, Emmanuel - the problem is that VisualVM will display its splash screen, then die with an error in the log about java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: java.nio.ByteBuffer.position(I)Ljava/nio/ByteBuffer; >> I am sorry but OpenJDK 8 will

Bug#897945: #897945 still present/breaks with Java 8

2019-01-29 Thread Per Lundberg
FWIW, version 1.4.2-1 works correctly with openjdk-11-jdk version 11.0.2+7-1, but it _does not_ work correct any more with Java 8 (openjdk-8-jdk version 8u191-b12-2) This worked correctly with 1.3.9-1 after downgrading the libnb-*-java packages as suggested by Ben - visualvm worked fine on Java

Bug#897945: Verified

2018-12-27 Thread Per Lundberg
FWIW, I have verified this bug on my machine - downgrading to 8.1+dfsg1-7 as suggested by Ben helped, making it work again. (Thanks, Ben!) Here is the stack trace when running with 8.1+dfsg1-8. To me, this looks like code compiled for Java 9+ trying to run on Java 8 (which I am currently using)