Bug#614907: Question of sincerity on the node/nodejs nausia

Can anyone explain to me why the message I sent with a proposal containing a MAJOR concession to the Node.js maintainers has not received a response from the Node.js maintainers but rather caused them (I'm assuming Jonathan Nieder is some how acting with their knowledge or approval at some level) t

Bug#630893: [PATCH] Relicense listen/ripdump.c to permit commercial use and distribution

R TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE > + * OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, > + * EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. > * > * Rehack for RIP-2 (RFC1388) by N0POY 4/1993 > * > -- > 1.7.10 > > > > > -- >

Bug#665236: fixed in ax25-tools 0.0.10-rc2+cvs20120204-3

oken. I don't recall it opening the editor, and assumed it generated the proper line in the changelog. Pat On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 07:26:18PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-04-09 at 16:17 +, Patrick Ouellette wrote: > > ax25-tools (0.0.10-rc

Bug#630893: ax25-apps: Should be removed from main

bject: Re: Bug#630893: ax25-apps: Should be removed from main > To: Patrick Ouellette > CC: Sebastian Muszynski > > Patrick Ouellette wrote: > >We are working on a resolution to the issue. > > Hi Patrick, > > Have you been in contact with Jeff White? I believe Seb

Bug#630893: ax25-apps: Should be removed from main

On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 10:16:19PM +, Javi Merino wrote: > > Package: ax25-apps > > Hi, > > Jeff White was contacted in June 2011 asking him to relicence the code > but he didn't reply. This package should be moved to non-free. > How, exactly, does commenting on a bug report with absolute

Bug#658770: Acknowledgement (libax25 FTBFS make: execvp: ./configure: Permission denied)

ation on this problem, please > >send it to 658...@bugs.debian.org. > Looks like ax25-tools and ax25-apps have the same issue. > Thanks. I'll get the packages updated. Pat -- ,---------. > Patrick Ouellette