Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1099053 in autopkgtest reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autopkgtest/-/commit/b69b55c35ddae68a4c1a8a95
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1088971 in autopkgtest reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autopkgtest/-/commit/439471ae745c9f63fff84006
On Fri, 06 Dec 2024 00:56:36 +0100 Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
wrote:
> [...] In the autopkgtest log, one can see that the
> following apt preferences file is written out:
>
> Package: src:glibc
> Pin: release unstable
> Pin-Priority: 995
>
> But that will only pin binary packages built fr
Control: tags -1 + patch
Tentative patch:
https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autopkgtest/-/merge_requests/476
--
Paride
On 2024-11-04 18:29, Paride Legovini wrote:
> *However*, if you check the policy table at this point, it will
> identical to the previous one. APT has no way to determine the real
> source of an installed package: it only knows about _versions_ of
> installed packages. [Note how /
On 2024-11-04 13:15, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> With the unshare backend(?) it seems that rebuilding a package without
> changing the version is causing test to fail becuase it consider the
> same version as a downgrade.
>
> For example:
>
> apt-get source libselinux
> cd libselinux-3.7
> autopk
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On 2024-10-28 14:08, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> I see autopkgtest failing to start with the following error:
>
> autopkgtest [13:53:25]: version 5.42
> autopkgtest [13:53:25]: host <..>; command line: /usr/bin/autopkgtest --user
> debci --apt-upgrade -s --output-dir=<..>
On Sun, 31 Jan 2021 20:56:35 +0100 Ivo De Decker wrote:
> package: webext-exteditor
> version: 2.0.4-1
> severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> Thunderbird 1:78.7.0-1 has 'Breaks: webext-exteditor (<= 2.0.4-1)', which
> means webext-exteditor doesn't work with it.
Upstream isn't active anymore. I sugges
On Wed, 17 Nov 2021 Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
Hi,
I was able to confirm that rebuilding glusterfs without tcmalloc (now
also on x86) fixes this issue.
Debugging revealed that this is due to tgt late dlopening optional
storage backends.
So if you have some of them installed like packages tgt-rbd +
Control: tags -1 + patch
On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
> per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
> a release, thus the severity.
>
> From the attached log (scroll to
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #915834 in irqbalance reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/irqbalance/commit/de6b3c8a1acf590706a83b52629f81
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #946155 in fscrypt reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/fscrypt/commit/c5bf1c329d49ea8fdcaccb9f59
Alex Hofbauer wrote on 04/12/2019:
> Package: libpam-fscrypt
> Version: 0.2.4-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Hi!
>
> Apparently in the latest version (0.2.5-1) the path substitution was broken,
> resulting in "PAM_INSTALL_PATH" being used instead of the library
control: block -1
Wolfgang Silbermayr wrote on 29/11/2019:
> On 11/28/19 9:04 PM, peter green wrote:
>> Package: rust-url-serde
>> Version: 0.2.0-1
>> Severity: serious
>> Tags: bullseye, sid
>>
>> librust-url-serde-dev depends on and rust-url-serde build-depends on
>> librust-url-1+default-dev wh
Wolfgang Silbermayr wrote on 29/11/2019:
> On 11/28/19 9:04 PM, peter green wrote:
>> Package: rust-url-serde
>> Version: 0.2.0-1
>> Severity: serious
>> Tags: bullseye, sid
>>
>> librust-url-serde-dev depends on and rust-url-serde build-depends on
>> librust-url-1+default-dev which is no longer pr
We settled with 'batcat', see
https://github.com/sharkdp/bat/issues/656
Ongoing discussion on the upstream tooling make the rename easier and
keep the manpage consistent:
https://github.com/sharkdp/bat/issues/659
Paride
We settled with 'batcat', see
https://github.com/sharkdp/bat/issues/656
Ongoing discussion on the upstream tooling make the rename easier and
keep the manpage consistent:
https://github.com/sharkdp/bat/issues/659
Paride
control: forcemerge 935578 934850
Merging the two bugs, as what we need is a full rename of the 'bat'
binary file and of its manpage, as #935578 bug states.
Paride
On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 Paride Legovini wrote:> I guess
I'll have to rename some files here. This isn't obvious at the
> moment as the build dependencies for rust-bat are not satisfied in unstable.
I'm asking upstream if they have a preference for the alternative binary
name,
Andreas Beckmann wrote on 24/08/2019:
> Package: bat
> Version: 0.11.0-2
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: piuparts
>
> Hi,
>
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install
> because it tries to overwrite other packages files.
>
> Since /u
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #911912 in golang-github-gin-gonic-gin reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-gin-go
On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 Richard Laager wrote:
> If this coordination is acceptable, I believe it solves the various
> interactions. I'm happy to test more scenarios if anyone thinks I missed
> something.
Hello Richard,
Just a friendly ping on this, as I'd like to see ntpsec migrate to
testing. What
The package also compiles fine in my local sbuild environment and on
debomatic-amd64:
http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/flif/0.3-1/buildlog
Paride
Control: forwarded 896109 https://github.com/FLIF-hub/FLIF/issues/498
On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 17:34:44 +0300 Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> flif FTBFS (also reproduced on amd64):
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=flif&suite=sid
Dear Adrian,
Thanks for your report. I noticed the issue and
24 matches
Mail list logo
