I found the root cause of this issue. It is the structure of the
tar.gz that is problematic. I have submitted a patch to upstream
build.xml at [1]. But untill it is fixed upstream I will have to patch
build.xml in Debian packaging.
[1] https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=20024&atid=320024
C
tags 627712 upstream
thanks
This problem seems to be with upstream build.xml. But I am not sure
why it does not cause issue in upstream distributions.
Following lines in build.xml are responsible in adding the XML data
files in jar files (line 419-422 in 1.2.x branch).
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:59 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Package: ant
> Version: 1.8.2-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: help
> Justification: FTBFS
>
> Hey
>
> As the title suggests, ant does not do too well on s390[1]. I had ant
> given back a couple of days and it gave exactly the same error, so I
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Matt Kraai wrote:
> tag 626069 wheezy sid
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> This build failure is only reproducible in wheezy and sid, so I'm
> adding those tags to remove this bug from the list of release-critical
> bugs affecting squeeze.
My guess is that this bug is probably
I was going to try and update this package. But there seems to be
already some packaging work done in the SVN repository. What is the
status of this packaging work?
Onkar
--
Passion - Some people climb mountains - others write Free software.
Don't ask why - the reason is the same.
--
To UNSU
Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 4:56 AM, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 03.06.2010, 21:53 +0200 schrieb Torsten Werner:
>> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Lucas Nussbaum
>> wrote:
>> > Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>>
>> cdk builds perfectly on my amd64 cowbuilder.
>
> Which jgrapht version did
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 11:02 PM, Torsten Werner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Daniel Schepler wrote:
>> [java] FAILURES!!!
>> [java] Tests run: 7, Failures: 0, Errors: 7
>
> it looks like another gij f*ckup. Switching to default-jdk helps.
I am working on this. I jus
Please find attached debdiff that fixes this bug and other build
problems with the package.
Onkar
maven-embedder_2.0.4-1.1.debdiff
Description: Binary data
tags 562437 patch
thanks
Please find attached a debdiff against current version archive. This
patch ports the Ubuntu changes to Debian which essentially fixes this
bug and few other minor changes.
Regards,
Onkar
--
Passion - Some people climb mountains - others write Free software.
Don't ask wh
reopen 558999
thanks
The bug is not fixed even with latest changes in packaging. It looks
like compiler flag set from debian/rules file is not getting used by
the build system. The build still fails with same error on hppa.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
wi
notfound 557720 2.6.32-2
thanks
The build does not fail on powerpc in 2.6.32-2.
https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=linux-2.6
Onkar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
block 559967 by 561317
thanks,
I had logged bug against libgcj10. I have also requested removal of
-gcj packages. [1]
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2009/12/msg00150.html
Onkar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
AFAIK, GCJ uses classpath library these days. The code from classpath
is being merged in GCJ. And from the status of classpath [1] it is
clear that java.net.URL.openConnection(java.net.Proxy) does not exist
in classpath implementation.
This can be easily tested. Try compiling following code with GC
I am not very good at GCC optimizations. Can you please explain why
this problem is not seen on other architectures? Also can you please
advise if I should add this compiler option for all arch or just hppa.
Thanks,
Onkar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
wit
tags 549838 + unreproducible
thanks
excalibur-logkit has alternate build dependency on libjboss-j2ee-java.
So it should not fail to build.
This bug is not reproducible in pbuilder chroot for sid. I have
uploaded a log at [1]
[1] http://people.ubuntu.com/~onkarshinde/excalibur-logkit_2.0-1_build.l
Now that libjgrapht-java is moved to main and the package is renamed
to libjgrapht0.6-java can someone please fix the build and runtime
dependencies of cdk?
Please also fix bug 546306.
Cheers,
Onkar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubsc
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Source: java-gnome
> Version: 4.0.13-1
> Severity: serious
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
>
>> sbuild (Debian sbuild) 0.58.2 (15 Jun 2009) on lxdebian.bfinv.de
> [...]
>> KILL Xvfb
>> KILL metacity
>> Excepti
Please find attached the patch that fixes this bug and improves the
packaging in general.
Cheers,
Onkar
proguard_4.3-2.1.debdiff
Description: Binary data
It looks like gcj does not understand '-sourcepath' option. I tried
changing the build dependency to default-jdk but there are other
problems with debian/rules file which still cause problem.
Upstream now contains a ant build script which does the heavy lifting
of the build process. I guess mainta
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Jan Willem Stumpel wrote:
> Package: azureus
> Version: 4.2.0.4-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> I have openjdk-6-jre installed, because azureus used to depend on it.
> openjdk works fine with other java applications as well, so no
>
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Torsten Werner wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:13 AM, Barry deFreese wrote:
>> Bumping this to serious now since jikes has been removed from the archive.
>
> This broken package cannot be built with any jdom version that is
> available in unstable. That is why I
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Here is the patch I injected into packaging SVN:
>
> http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/debian-med/trunk/packages/biojava/trunk/debian/control?op=diff&rev=0&sc=0
This is exactly the change I tried while doing local build in
pbuilder. But there is on
@Andreas,
Did you try to build it in pbuilder. I added the build dependency
ant-optional and built modified package in pbuilder. It builds fine.
@Peter,
You forgot to actually add the patch. :-)
Cheers,
Onkar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Package: libextractor-java
Version: 0.5.18-5
Severity: serious
The package fails to build in pbuilder unstable chroot with following error.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy: Depends: libgcj-dev which is a virtual package.
The following actions will r
Package: javahelper
Version: 0.18
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 7.2
In unstable distribution or unstable chroot, the package fails to
install. The reason being that it
declares dependency on icepick which is removed from unstable.
Please check following links for clarification about ice
Package: libjboss-web-services-java
Version: 0.0+svn5660+dak1-1
Severity: serious
I am filing a bug (with minor changes) since I got no reply to my mail at [1].
I was recently checking if jbossas4 version from Debian unstable
builds properly on Ubuntu so that I can drop changes made in last
Ubunt
Vincent,
Thanks for enlightenment. I am not very familiar with BTS. :-)
Onkar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Why is this RC bug? The version you have specified is in experimental.
testing has 1:0.94.dfsg-2. AFAIK, that version is not affected by this
bug.
Onkar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debia
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 5:29 PM, Torsten Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> tags 503780 + pending
> thanks,
>
> Hi Onkar,
>
> is the package ready for upload? Do you need a sponsor?
Yes. It is available in pkg-java svn trunk. I have not yet tagged the
new revision.
I have already mailed debian-jav
29 matches
Mail list logo
