Bug#745794: chromium FTBFS on i386 leaves users w/o security support

2014-04-29 Thread Nikolaus Schulz
Hi, please note that chromium failing to build on i386 blocks new chromium versions with security fixes, and thus leaves i386 users with an insecure browser. The reporter of bug #745794[1] suggested that it's enough to add the proper build-dependency on libkrb5-dev. Is this correct, or are there

Bug#724043: archivemail: FTBFS: Test failure

2013-11-24 Thread Nikolaus Schulz
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 06:26:39PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 03/10/13 at 19:40 +0200, Nikolaus Schulz wrote: > > Actually uploading a fixed package will have to wait until I return from > > holidays, though, so it won't happen before 20th October. > > Hi N

Bug#724043: archivemail: FTBFS: Test failure

2013-10-03 Thread Nikolaus Schulz
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 09:27:53AM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote: > On Thursday, October 03, 2013 02:43:03 PM Nikolaus Schulz wrote: > > This is really weird. Because what the test code there does is > > something like this: > > > > s = 24 * 60 * 60 >

Bug#724043: archivemail: FTBFS: Test failure

2013-10-03 Thread Nikolaus Schulz
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 07:14:50PM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote: > On Wednesday, October 02, 2013 02:45:38 AM Nikolaus Schulz wrote: > > Hm, can you reproduce this? I see that the test parameters there are > > questionable, but still, the test should not fail. > > Yes, I jus

Bug#724043: archivemail: FTBFS: Test failure

2013-10-01 Thread Nikolaus Schulz
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 07:48:59AM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote: > From my pbuilder build log: > > ... > debian/rules build > dh --with=python2 build >dh_testdir >dh_auto_configure >debian/rules override_dh_auto_build [...] > ./test_archivemail > ..

Bug#627782: archivemail: FTBFS: IIOError: CRC check failed 0x1a15fced != 0xe10d79e9L

2011-05-24 Thread Nikolaus Schulz
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:38:59PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Nikolaus Schulz , 2011-05-24, 22:50: > >I cannot reproduce this. What filesystem are you using? > > /tmp (which is the directory that matters AFAIUI) is on aufs, with > overlay and underlay both on ext4. Ah, i

Bug#627782: archivemail: FTBFS: IIOError: CRC check failed 0x1a15fced != 0xe10d79e9L

2011-05-24 Thread Nikolaus Schulz
tags 627782 + unreproducible moreinfo thanks I cannot reproduce this. What filesystem are you using? Nikolaus > archivemail FTBFS in unstable: > > | make[1]: Entering directory `/build/archivemail-GeuLuZ/archivemail-0.8.2' > | ./test_archivemail > | > .F.F.

Bug#609254: nginx-full: fails to install when upgrading nginx from << 0.8.54-1

2011-01-07 Thread Nikolaus Schulz
Package: nginx-full, nginx-light, nginx-extras Version: 0.8.54-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 7.6.1 Hi, the following happened while upgrading from squeeze (with nginx 0.7.67-3) to sid: Selecting previously deselected package nginx-full. Unpacking nginx-full (from .../nginx-f

Bug#564882: correcting version information for mailutils-mh bug #564882

2010-01-15 Thread Nikolaus Schulz
found 1:2.1+dfsg1-3 notfound 1:1.2+dfsg1-4 thanks Sorry, I sent the bugreport in the middle of upgrading, with the old version of the package from lenny still installed. Nikolaus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont

Bug#564882: mailutils-mh: fails to upgrade from lenny, trying to overwrite files in libmailutils1

2010-01-12 Thread Nikolaus Schulz
Package: mailutils-mh Version: 1:1.2+dfsg1-4 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 7.6.1 Hi, while upgrading from lenny to squeeze, installing mailutils-mh failed: Preparing to replace mailutils-mh 1:1.2+dfsg1-4 (using .../mailutils-mh_1%3a2.1+dfsg1-3_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement mailut

Bug#549736: archivemail: FTBFS: tests failed

2009-10-08 Thread Nikolaus Schulz
report for an XFS filesystem to the upstream BTS[1]. I would like to note that it is only the test suite which fails here, there is no bug in archivemail itself. The following fix is from my git repository: commit f22b21738d77aa0fe13fe0fea0288ec9a2dc456c Author: Nikolaus Schulz Date: Mon Sep 29 03:05:57 2008 +02

Bug#514278: acpi-support: postinst removes conffile thinkpad_acpi.modprobe (and messes with others)

2009-02-05 Thread Nikolaus Schulz
Package: acpi-support Version: 0.109-10 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 10.7.3 Hi, /etc/modprobe.d/thinkpad_acpi.modprobe is removed in the postinst. Other, obsolete conffiles are renamed. All this happens unconditionally, that is, discarding all possible changes of the user to these fil

Bug#493407: lsb-base: log_warning_msg breaks initscripts with set -e

2008-08-03 Thread Nikolaus Schulz
Boy, this makes *every* init script running with set -e immediately terminate when calling log_warning_msg. I don't think log_warning_msg should return a non-zero exit status (the LSB says nothing on this subject). Nikolaus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsu

Bug#476806: AssertionError when archiving empty maildirs

2008-04-20 Thread Nikolaus Schulz
tags 476806 + patch thanks On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 04:38:05PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Julien Danjou wrote: > > First of all, I'm making this bug serious since it breaks the software > > for me, but feel free to downgrade. Unless you feed multiple mailboxes to archivemail in one go, I don't see

Bug#438540: libid3-3.8.3c2a: creates insecure temporary files

2007-08-17 Thread Nikolaus Schulz
Package: libid3-3.8.3c2a Version: 3.8.3-6 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Hi, when tagging file $foo, a temporary copy of the file is created, and for some reason, libid3 doesn't use mkstemp but just creates $foo.XX literally, without any checking. This wou

Bug#395252: mplayer and Etch

2006-11-16 Thread Nikolaus Schulz
Hi, speaking as a conservative[1] user who's going to run Etch for roughly two years: is there any hope that some hero will address this annoying issue somehow and thereby let mplayer enter Etch? I would really, really appreciate that. Nikolaus [1] read: running pure Debian stable with no bac

Bug#385253: uses temporary files unsafely; race

2006-09-10 Thread Nikolaus Schulz
Joey Hess wrote: > Noah Meyerhans wrote: > > Upon investigating this for stable, I wonder if the problem is as bad as > > reported. It seems that archivemail sets up its own temp directory and > > creates its files in it: > > > > # create a temporary directory for us to work in securely > >