ace libproc-dev build-dependency with libprocps0-dev.
Thanks for the Info
Currently I am in France and hopefuly I will upload the new Version on
Wednesday.
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
--
# Debian GNU/Linux Consultant ###
t; library version package so it won't be like the programs suddenly stop
> working like before.
Thankyou for the message. I will update xmem as fast as possibel
> - Craig (Debian and upstream maintainer of procps)
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
--
nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
--
# Debian GNU/Linux Consultant ##
Development of Intranet and Embedded Systems with Debian GNU/Linux
Internet Service Provider, Cloud Computing
<http://www.itsystems.tamay-dogan.
ase forward this message urgently to upstream.
Note: The 16 MByte are a result of SPAM and it has cost me 0.009 €/kByte
(~530 Euro) using my GSM-Provider e-Plus (germany)
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
24V Electronic Engineer
Tam
Am 2008-07-04 08:34:03, schrieb timdau:
> 15 days later, still no patch.
END OF REPLIED MESSAGE
What about writing and submiting one?
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
24V Electronic Engin
si a little bit misinterpretedt since 2.1
mean the version of "ssmtp" and NOT the GPL.
> Well, there is no GPL in version 2.1. :-(
:-)
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
24V Electronic Engineer
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consult
release-critical and therefore set the severity to
> serious. May someone lower it if I'm wrong.
Normaly debconf ask, whether you want to install /bin/bash as /bin/sh.
Maybe you have confirmed to fast?
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Tama
I do not agree with the removal of this package.
>
> Kind regards,
> Philipp Kern
- END OF REPLIED MESSAGE -
I second this since I use it on all of my own (146)
and customers (over 2300) machines...
Thanks, Greetings and
version from me) which has not closed the ORPHAN/ADOPTION bug.
I have already ask Lior, what to to.
Note: They have killed my working package on and
replaced it by a crappy NMU into experimental which SEGV, FTBFS
and more... I see this as sabotage!
Greetings
Mich
y of Defense and I am working in Emerode where I have no
regulary Internet access. So I have a delay in my responses.
Greetings
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
Am 2007-06-21 15:19:44, schrieb Lior Kaplan:
> Package: libnss
didn't send that mail to you, I send it
> to the BTS which send it to you...
>
> Anyway:
>
> - Christian Bayle uploaded the package but did not remove Wichert as
> Maintainer. He instead added himself as uploader
> - There is an ITA bug (#425860), owned by Michelle Konzack
hanges with pgfoundry code, to
> avoid code fork.
ACK
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
###
Am 2007-06-04 17:31:22, schrieb Wichert Akkerman:
> I don't know who uploaded that version, but I'm no longer maintaining
> this package.
I was realy surprised about the upload to experimental and the error.
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konzack
Systemadminis
bian user and should not be.
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
# Debian GNU/Linux Consultant ##
enter Network/Education Centers in
Morocco, Palestine, Lebanon and Iran it will break in one time over 500
Debian installations.
Be sure there are more Installations as my 500...
This Version of fvwm will bring you enemies if it can not be solved.
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konz
According to this Bugreport, it would be better, IF
the behaviour of "-v" stay as it is, but preventing
the output of the base64 password IF the UID is != 0.
Otherwise a Systemadministrator can run into trouble
while debuging errors.
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michel
e for a fvwm95 theme on fvwm2.
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
Am 2006-11-07 15:25:41, schrieb Rob Bochan:
> Package: wdm
> Version: 1.28-2.1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: ren
Am 2006-04-21 11:06:54, schrieb Julien Cristau:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 20:04:39 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
>
> > Package: grep
> > Version: 2.5.1.ds1-4
> > Severity: grave
> >
> > Error description:
> >
> > /bin/zgrep: 103: Syntax error
Am 2006-04-21 11:06:54, schrieb Julien Cristau:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 20:04:39 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
>
> > Package: grep
> > Version: 2.5.1.ds1-4
> > Severity: grave
> >
> > Error description:
> >
> > /bin/zgrep: 103: Syntax error
Am 2006-04-21 11:06:54, schrieb Julien Cristau:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 20:04:39 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
>
> > Package: grep
> > Version: 2.5.1.ds1-4
> > Severity: grave
> >
> > Error description:
> >
> > /bin/zgrep: 103: Syntax error
my old RegExp. It seems, the RegExp used in
zgrep does not more work
> Could you try running the script with set -x?
Yes, but it is definitivly the RegExp from "sed", which does not
more work.
Greetings
Michelle Konzack
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http:/
of my BASH scripts and need to
check all of my customes, because the scripts do not more work.
I consider this bug as "grave" because it breaks backup and update
scripts for tele-maintenance.
Greetings
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian
Package: postgresql
Version: 7.4.7-6sarge1
Severity: critical
Error description:
I had to reinstall my Development Workstaion and the PostgreSQL
Database is located on /dev/sdb1 mounted as /PostgreSQL.
I have:
+---[ cmd 'ls -Al /PostgreSQL/' ]-
|
| total 44
| -r
I do not know, whether I have already respond to you...
Am 2005-09-18 14:14:59, schrieb Florian Weimer:
> * Michelle Konzack:
> > I can confirm this too
> > It does not affect Debian, but Mandrake and Redhat... :-)
>
> How have you determined this?
>
> Can
t not apply to debian at all.
I can confirm this too
It does not affect Debian, but Mandrake and Redhat... :-)
> - Larry
Greetings
Michelle
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886
5
OK, it works correctly.
Patch can officialy applyed to ssmtp (woody).
Thank
Michelle
Am 2005-05-09 12:57:57, schrieb Michelle Konzack:
> Hello Anibal,
>
> I have added your patch and send this messag
--
Greetings
Michelle
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886
50, rue de Soultz MSM LinuxMichi
0033/3/8845235667100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)
signature.pgp
Am 2005-03-10 14:10:59, schrieb Michelle Konzack:
> This message will test the Subject for
>
> ( %c %i %o %t )
So we have:
( 134559456 3326 % )
Which mean:
%c is droped
%i 134559456serialdate ? (1974-04-07 10:37:36)
%o
Rachinsky and the BTS
whre I have send the message too.
Greetings
Michelle
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886
50, rue de Soultz MSM LinuxMichi
0033/3/8845235667100 Strasbourg
is not in mutt but ssmtp version 2.50.6.1 (WOODY)
while I have now installed a backport 2.61-1 from WOODY.
If this message is working, I will reinstall the WOODY version and
resend this message.
Greetings
Michelle
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
Michelle Kon
Am 2005-03-04 12:28:49, schrieb Marco d'Itri:
> reassign 298054 ssmtp
> retitle 298054 ssmtp mangles messages in transit
> tag 298054 security
> thanks
>
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.mutt.user/cutoff=21449
>
> BTW, this may be a security problem too and should be investigated as
> such.
Fo
31 matches
Mail list logo
