On 14/06/24 19:02, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote:
On 14/06/2024 05:59, Mark Robinson wrote:
Package: gramps
Version: 5.2.2+dfsg-0.1
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
bummer.
New version of gramps in Trixie upgrade.
Insisted on upgrading database advising
Package: gramps
Version: 5.2.2+dfsg-0.1
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Dear Maintainer,
New version of gramps in Trixie upgrade.
Insisted on upgrading database advising to create backup without means.
Upgraded and loaded database.
Spat error, lost new record.
--
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-9417
Package: firmware-brcm80211
Version: 0.43
Severity: critical
Tags: security upstream
Justification: root security hole
Dear Maintainer,
CVE-2017-8386 "BroadPwn" has been around for a while.
It seems Debian ships the relevant firmware in this package.
Could I impose on you to ensure that all is
kanae:~# aptitude -vV upgrade
W: The "upgrade" command is deprecated; use "safe-upgrade" instead.
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Reading extended state information
Initializing package states... Done
Reading task descriptions... Done
The fo
Hi folks,
Get:55 http://http.us.debian.org sid/main proj-data 4.6.1-3 [2925kB]
Get:56 http://http.us.debian.org sid/main proj 4.6.1-3 [20.3kB]
Get:57 http://http.us.debian.org sid/main libproj0 4.6.1-3 [134kB]
Get:58 http://http.us.debian.org sid/main proj-bin 4.6.1-3 [57.5kB]
Get:59 http://http
Sadly the workaround
dpkg-reconfigure nspluginwrapper
update-alternatives --auto flash-mozilla.so
hasn't changed anything for me.
The outputs of Bart's tests remain the same.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bart Martens wrote:
Could you send me the output of these commands please ?
kanae:~# dpkg -l|grep -i flash
ii flashplugin-nonfree 1:1.7.2 Adobe
Flash Player - browser plugin
ii kwordquiz4:3.5.9-2
flashca
Bart Martens wrote:
update-alternatives --list flash-mozilla.so|xargs dpkg -S
kanae:~# l /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/plugins/npwrapper.libflashplayer.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 74312 2008-09-04 12:47
/usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/plugins/npwrapper.libflashplayer.so
kanae:~#
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
AMD32:
Testing 1.7.1+1.63 was successful while my impression was that this was broken
a day or two back. I could easily be thinking of 1.7.1 plain.
Upgrading to 1.7.2 restored the "You need to upgrade your flash player" message.
AMD64:
In the interim I have upgraded mobo/processor/ram and inst
The workaround doesn't work for me as 15 is required by evince and imagemagick,
which kde would much prefer remained.
> # dpkg -P libdjvulibre15
> dpkg: dependency problems prevent removal of libdjvulibre15:
> libmagick10 depends on libdjvulibre15 (>= 3.5.20).
> evince depends on libdjvulibre15
Does moving /var/lib/apt/listchanges.db work-around this ?
(too late for me to check, already reinstalled)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
$ gosmore
gosmore: error while loading shared libraries: libgps.so.15: cannot open shared
object file: No such file or directory
$ man gosmore
No manual entry for gosmore
See 'man 7 undocumented' for help when manual pages are not available.
$ls -al /usr/lib/libgps*
# ls -al /usr/lib/libgps*
l
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# aptitude
aptitude: error while loading shared libraries: libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6.so.3.11:
cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# find / -name libapt-pkg-libc*
/usr/lib/libapt-pkg-libc6.5-6.so.4.4.0
/usr/lib/libapt-pkg-libc6.5-6.so.4.4
[EMA
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.88
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
...
Setting up initramfs-tools (0.88) ...
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.18-4-k7
ERROR lilo fails for new /boot/initrd.img-2.6.18-4-k7:
Added 2.6.18-4-k7 *
Fatal: open /boot/vmlinuz-2
but the workaround is giving me grief.
I've can reproducibly revert to 1.5 but all attempts to then follow the steps
to install 2.0 through up a popup saying something to the effect that another
version of icedove is running, kill it or restart your system. There's nothing
to kill, a new x zses
sadly 2.0 is now in testing which means that the workaround above no longer
works.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: joe
Version: 3.5-1
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
alt/x enter segfault(loss of data)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
K
python-central 0.4.13 which propagated into today's unstable updates appears to
have fixed this problem.
Thanks
Mark
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
piwakawaka:~# dpkg -l python2.* | grep -v '[pu]n '
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name VersionDe
python-central 4.8, 4.9 and 4.10 arrived in this morning's unstable updates but
the problem remains:
Setting up python (2.3.5-7) ...
Setting up python2.3-dev (2.3.5-13) ...
Setting up python-parallel (0.2-3) ...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/py_compilefiles", line 103, in
FYI Tiger threw up these warnings too:
NEW: --WARN-- [lin001w] File `/usr/X11R6/bin/dh_pycentral' does not belong to
any package.
NEW: --WARN-- [lin001w] File `/usr/X11R6/bin/py_compilefiles' does not belong
to any package.
NEW: --WARN-- [lin001w] File `/usr/X11R6/bin/pycentral' does not belong
I can confirm this bug.
# aptitude -vV upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading extended state information
Initializing package states... Done
Building tag database... Done
The following packages have been kept back:
fftw3 [3.0.1-14 -> 3.1.1-1]
0 packages
Package: firefox
Version: 1.5.dfsg-3
Followup-For: Bug #344401
My system seems to be similar to those of people seeing this behaviour, but
I am instead seeing a message to the effect of "All printing disabled,
Debian bug ... " pop up very briefly on pressing the print button.
The printer then pro
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/qgis_0.7.4-1_i386.deb
(--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/qgis/georefplugin.so', which is also
in package qgis-plugin-georeferencing
piwakawaka:~# aptitude install qgis
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading
Thank you Michal,
I can confirm that "scsi: unknown opcode 0x01" appears in my dmesg.
The error message output was provided as requested.
My naievete meant that I couldn't tell which of the many error messages
in the output were significant. My instinct was that the one about
suid not being set
System
---
K3b Version: 0.12
KDE Version: 3.4.2
QT Version: 3.3.5
Kernel: 2.6.11-1-k7
Devices
---
LITE-ON DVDRW LDW-451S GSB6 (/dev/hdc, ) at /cdrom [CD-R; CD-RW; CD-ROM;
DVD-ROM; DVD-RW; DVD+R; DVD+RW] [DVD-ROM; DVD-R Sequential; DVD-RW
Restricted
see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=328704
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: geda
Version: 20041228-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-1-k7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Vers
Hi folks,
Today's update runs update-fonts-dir on /usr/lib/X11/fonts/truetype
This throws up
warning: /usr/lib/X11/fonts/truetype does not exist or is not a directory
during the upgrade process.
My system does have a /usr/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType
The really scary thing is that this wouldn'
30 matches
Mail list logo
