On 12/15/2009 10:08 AM, Alain Knaff wrote:
>
> This does indeed look like a different problem to me... No sector with a
> "bad" track id, but lots of sectors "skipped". But these skips look more
> like they are happening during read (rather than being really missed), as
> on the second pass, they
ael wrote:
> For what it is worth, here are the results from my debian testing box
> under 2.6.32_exact-55846-gf405425
>
> $ lsmod |grep floppy
> floppy 45327 0
>
> # setfdprm /dev/fd0 HD
> # fdformat /dev/fd0
> Double-sided, 80 tracks, 18 sec/track. Total capacity 1440 kB.
> For
ael wrote:
> Alain Knaff wrote:
>> On 14/12/09 12:27, ael wrote:
>>> # getfdprm -o /dev/fd0u1440
>>> 2880 18 2 80 0 0x1b 0x00 0xcf 0x6c
>>>
>>> # fdrawcmd drive=/dev/fd0u1440 readid 0 repeat=18
>>> raw cmd: Invalid argument
>>
>> ... and if you try with /dev/fd0 instead?
>
> Yes. I tried all the o
ael wrote:
> Alain Knaff wrote:
>> Mark Hounschell wrote:
>> [...]
>>> All kernels below 2.6.28 work on these boxes. All kernels 2.6.28 and
>>> higher do NOT.
>>
>> 2.6.28 was when support for sector "bases" other than 0 or 1 were
>> i
4 matches
Mail list logo
