Bug#453166: More info on Swig 1.31 vs 1.33

Hi, In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Re: More info on Swig 1.31 vs 1.33" on Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:32:58 +0900, "Kouhei Sutou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Solution: > 1) use 'vresult' instead of $result. :< > 2) ask for reverting the SWIG change

Bug#453166: More info on Swig 1.31 vs 1.33

Hi, 2008/1/30, Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > %typemap(ruby, argout) apr_pool_t *pool > { >svn_swig_rb_set_pool($result, _global_svn_swig_rb_pool); >svn_swig_rb_pop_pool(_global_svn_swig_rb_pool); > } > > This isn't really output parameter processing (hint: it doesn't > assig