Bug#754758: musl: FTBFS on armhf: wrong asm instructions?

2014-08-04 Thread Kevin Bortis
musl 1.1.4 was submitted some minutes ago, which will resolve all pending known issues. This will fix the bug described. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#754758: musl: FTBFS on armhf: wrong asm instructions?

2014-07-14 Thread Kevin Bortis
This bug is known and was fixed in musl 1.1.1. Unfortunatly musl does not build at the moment on unstable and testing, because of a serious gcc-4.9.0 bug #748681, that is not fixed yet. Chances are there, that it will get fixed by upstream gcc-4.9.1. Until then, musl-1.1.0-1 is also suffering from

Bug#750815: musl: CVE-2014-3484: remote stack-based buffer overflow in DNS response

2014-06-11 Thread Kevin Bortis
The musl package 1.1.2 is packaged and ready for upload. Unfortunatly Debian unstable has switched to gcc-4.9 as their default compiler, which introduces a serious bug in weak alias constant folding. A possible patch is attached to the upstream gcc bug, but is currently not applied or reviewed by t

Bug#725376: musl-dev: must not provide libc-dev

2013-10-05 Thread Kevin Bortis
The problem: All official Debian arches are eglibc based. So musl will never provide libc-dev for them. The main reason why the musl debian package exists is for bootstrapping a new debian port "musl-linux-armhf" which is already supported by dpkg. For that arch musl is providing the libc-dev packa