On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 12:21:36PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, 21 May 2015 13:07:35 +0200 Karel Zak wrote:
>
> > The option '-s' does not affect return code ... we have information
> > about all (including empty) partitions!
>
> Ok, I see. Sounds like
the UUID is the same like kernel uses for root= command
line option.
Note that my recommendation is to use lsblk, for example:
# lsblk --noheading --output FSTYPE /dev/sda1
vfat
it reads info from udev db (libblkid is only fallback here), and it
provides better way how to control outp
: Inappropriate ioctl for device
Good catch, TIOCSCTTY is optional in the current code so tcsetpgrp()
should not be required too.
Fixed. Thanks.
> (Unless these errors are all symptoms of another problem, that is.)
The question is why your agetty is not able to get controlling tty.
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 09:28:05AM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Karel Zak wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 09:36:28AM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> >> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Timo Juhani Lindfors
> >> wrote:
>
?
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=613589
Fixed by commit 73356e0553bd9ac00f556891a4798064c0ee6849 (v2.19).
Karel
--
Karel Zak
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
if (debug > 1) {
> > if (verbose)
> > printf("%2d:%12d\t%12d\t%12d\n", Index[i],
>
> Karel,
> what do you think about the patch proposed by Aurelien?
Applied, thanks.
Karel
--
Karel Zak
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
--
To UNSUBSCR
e:
> > On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 10:56:49AM +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 02:26:58PM +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> > > > fsck -A output does not indicate the offending device(s), when a device
> > > > is
> > > > non
r; /* where the part starts... */
u_int32_t num_sectors;/* ...and it's length */
};
IMHO it does not make sense to use non-cylinder alignment here.
Karel
--
Karel Zak
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ..
ck peek into shadow-utils-4.1.2-8.fc10.src.rpm suggests Fedora is
> > also affected. I do not know about RHEL.
>
> shadow-utils.spec:rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_bindir}/login
>
> makes me think Fedora / RHEL should be free of login's bugs.
yes, we use the classic login(1) f
9 matches
Mail list logo
