On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 03:41:46PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> However may I ask you to take a look at the RC bugs in your DDPO? [2]
> ;-)
Intriguing, I completely missed that maildrop bug, I think my spam filters
somehow ate it. I'll try to figure out both issues, thanks for the hint.
--
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:20:50AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Josip, do you really still care about this package?
I'm pretty sure I told Sam to take it over a few years back...?
If you want to fix that, by all means, just work on it.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
reassign 819198 www.debian.org
thanks
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 03:49:28PM -0300, Js wrote:
> Package: libapache2-mod-auth-radius
> Version: 1.5
> Severity: serious
> Tags: upstream
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
>
> The package libapache2-mod-auth-
Package: xen-hypervisor-4.1-amd64
Version: 4.1.4-3+deb7u4
Severity: critical
Hi,
Not sure how come I'm the first one to file this kind of a bug report :)
but here goes JFTR...
http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-123.html was embargoed, but advance
warning was given to several big Xen VM farms, w
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 09:42:30PM +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 09:57:31AM +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> > > apxs2 -c mod_auth_radius-2.0.c
> > > /usr/share/apr-1.0/build/libtool --silent --mode=compile
> > > --tag=disable-static x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -std=gnu99
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 09:57:31AM +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> apxs2 -c mod_auth_radius-2.0.c
> /usr/share/apr-1.0/build/libtool --silent --mode=compile --tag=disable-static
> x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -std=gnu99 -prefer-pic -pipe -g -O2
> -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-securi
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 01:30:02PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Control: tag -1 patch pending
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for libapache-mod-auth-radius (versioned as
> 1.5.8-1.2) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if
> I should delay it longer.
>
> Apolo
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:24:03AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> please see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2011-4966
> for details and a link to the upstream fix.
AFAICT this is a year old, so apparently it's not really so important? :)
Do you think we should take the opportu
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:02:39AM +0100, Philipp Hug wrote:
> > In fact, if you had been listening to me from day one, you'd realize
> > that I'm not even asking you to actually fix this problem.
> > I'm merely asking you to make the users who aren't using your personally
> > preferred use case, b
Following on Philipp's comment, I went looking for explanation in the old
template config file changes, and found the sysrq calls added with no
obvious explanation here:
http://git.drbd.org/gitweb.cgi?p=drbd-8.3.git;a=commitdiff;h=3b4452d69b4371dbeee5a38f2e248a6360c14c77
But this is still conditio
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 04:29:47PM +0200, Philipp Hug wrote:
> It should probably be changed into something like this:
> "/usr/lib/drbd/notify-emergency-reboot.sh; reboot -f &; sync &; sleep 30;
> echo
> b > /proc/sysrq-trigger";
> So, we'd have at least time to sync other file systems and try to
These defaults are really bad.
I had this happen to a machine running DRBD yesterday:
block drbd0: PingAck did not arrive in time.
block drbd0: peer( Secondary -> Unknown ) conn( Connected -> NetworkFailure )
pdsk( UpToDate -> DUnknown )
block drbd0: asender terminated
block drbd0: Terminating
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 12:57:06PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Nestor Lopez Casado wrote:
>
> > Take a look at this thread ... where a patch was published ...
> >
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/958174
> >
> > Your issue may come from the same problem.
> >
> > I
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:46:29AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 06:26:42PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > I'll try to bisect this now with my config.
>
> It looks like it's definitely in some way related with the introduction of
> CONFIG_HID_
Control: retitle -1 AMD SB 750 + Logitech USB keyboard brokenness with Linux
3.2 (regression from 3.1)
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 06:26:42PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> I'll try to bisect this now with my config.
It looks like it's definitely in some way related with the in
Package: linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.2-amd64
Severity: serious
Hi,
I've experienced this regression from squeeze, so I'm noting it before
I forget and wheezy's released...
I have a desktop machine with a motherboard that has an AMD SB 750
south bridge with an integrated USB controller.
With Linux 2.
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 06:08:53AM +0200, Fabio M. Di NItto wrote:
> On 07/01/2012 02:50 PM, Arno Töll wrote:
> > tags 667629 + patch
> > tags 667629 + pending
> > thanks
> >
> > Dear maintainer,
> >
> > I've prepared an NMU for libapache-mod-auth-radius (versioned as
> > 1.5.8-1.1) and
> > uplo
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 01:08:59PM +0200, José Antonio Antelo wrote:
> Is it possible to backport freeradius to stable version?
Yes, I'll get to it eventually. You can also request that someone else does
it in the backports support channels.
> And try to add the new FR to debian 7 before being f
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:09:02PM +0200, Rafael Varela Pet wrote:
> Are there any plans to fix this in a near future? Even though we have a
> fail over system with three servers, this bug is becoming very annoying...
I'm just being tardy with uploading the new version, sorry.
Hope to get to it so
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 05:59:31PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Err, another startx attempt a few minutes later - worked!
>
> I'll try to reboot and reproduce...
Reproduced, it works the second time around. Some sort of race condition
on the initial run?
--
Hi again,
Err, another startx attempt a few minutes later - worked!
I'll try to reboot and reproduce...
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debia
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 09:36:52PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: libapache-mod-auth-radius
> Version: 1.5.8-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: wheezy sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120419 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of a
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:18:17AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: freeradius
> Version: 2.1.10+dfsg-3
> Severity: serious
> Tags: wheezy sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>
> Hi,
>
> During a re
Package: postgresql-9.1
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream
Hi,
This is effectively http://bugs.debian.org/632028 but in unstable.
We had the bad change reverted in 8.4.x (stable), but the new version
has remained unfixed.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2011-05/msg00080.php
http://archives
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:38:46AM +0200, Alan T DeKok wrote:
> Josip Rodin wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 04:42:51PM +0200, Alan T DeKok wrote:
> >> Josip Rodin wrote:
> >>> FYI:
> >> If I recall correctly, this was a bad pointer in 2.1.10. It was fix
Since my reasoning here didn't seem to leave a particular positive dent with
those tech-ctte members who have responded so far, I would just like to
solicit Ian Jackson's input, given his role in defining and implementing the
debian/rules calling convention originally. In other worse, if I can't
c
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 04:18:34PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> (I don't recall if anyone tried to loop you into that discussion; if that
> didn't happen, that was a flaw in that discussion process to be sure.)
Nope, sorry, I missed that.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
--
To
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 04:53:01PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > And still, this is a Makefile so you can quickly reuse Makefile snippets
> > > that others have been writing to add support for supplementary targets
> > > (like get-orig-source) or even to influence the environment (like the
>
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 03:38:39PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi Josip,
>
> On Thu, 08 Sep 2011, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Instead, it is important to retain the age-old idea that the rules file has
> > its own calling convention (an API) that isn't linked to one speci
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:50:33AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Nevertheless, merely having that doubt in developers' minds is a cost;
> 17058 packages can definitely use this technique, while for 1 package we
> have to think about it ... so I would still want to hear of a clear
> benefit to allowi
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:43:44AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Would you mind explaining here why you feel it is important to retain the
> flexibility of multiple implementation languages for debian/rules?
Now, I wouldn't actually put it that way - because that would imply that we
could suddenly
reassign 640874 tech-ctte
thanks
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 08:21:32AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Package: leave
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 4.9 - must directive
> User: lint-ma...@debian.org
> Usertags: debian-rules-not-a-makefile debian-rules-missing-required-target
> debian-rul
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 02:00:48PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Dixi quod???
>
> >Josip Rodin dixit:
> >
> >>You can prepare a patch, sure, but while you're at it, do first test the
> >>situation where 'editorrc' is a slave to 'editor&#
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 04:42:01PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Josip Rodin dixit:
>
> >/var/lib/misc/editorrc could work?
>
> Sure would. Do you want me to prepare a patch for joe?
> If so, should I version it as NMU or regularily?
You can prepare a patch, sure, but w
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 09:10:20AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Josip Rodin dixit:
>
> >The only question would be whether having a symlink called /etc/editorrc
> >would confuse non-joe users.
>
> Hm. Too bad we can't directly link to /etc/alternatives/editorr
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 08:03:40AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Josip Rodin dixit:
>
> >And if you no longer have /etc/joe/editorrc but instead /etc/editorrc,
> >then that still requires source patching for joe to actually *read* it,
> >so you're back to square o
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 10:28:17PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> >Maybe simply coding it differently inside joe will be the best solution -
> >if it notices that $self is 'editor', then don't just look for
> >/etc/joe/${self}rc but instead look itself up once again through
> >/etc/alternatives/ed
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 08:20:21PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just ran into a funny problem regarding update-alternatives
> and editorrc: if joe is installed, it wants /etc/joe/editorrc
> whereas jupp reads /etc/jupp/editorrc (I???ll use joe???s for now
> and symlink to it but that
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:44:09PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:37:57PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Do you have any packages built with the patch that I could test?
> > amd64 preferably :)
>
> Sure:
>
> http://thrall.0x539.de/~pkern/pos
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:09:13PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:32:27AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Anyway, this kind of a query fails under PostgreSQL 9.0.4 and 8.4.8:
>
> Would you mind completing this testcase for me? I.e. at least acl_inherits is
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-05/msg00738.php
Another consideration here is that because I back-ported the 9.0
checking code into REL8_4:
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=5d3853a7fa40b28b44b14084863fd83a188c9a9e
Package: postgresql-8.4
Version: 8.4.8-0squeeze1
Severity: grave
Hi there,
Unfortunately this "stable" upgrade of PostgreSQL 8.4.7-0squeeze2 to
8.4.8-0squeeze1 introduced a bug apparently from the 9.0 branch that is
now consistently breaking queries on our production "stable" machines.
Upstream
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 08:17:00PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 04:28:14PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> > I still don't see how this could be a php5-pgsql bug since it's caused
> > by pgsql version.
>
> I filed it preemptively on all so as to
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 04:28:14PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> I still don't see how this could be a php5-pgsql bug since it's caused
> by pgsql version.
I filed it preemptively on all so as to solicit help... if there is no odd
variable behavior in php5-pgsql based on server version, please feel
reassign 630569 postgresql-8.4, postgresql-9.0, php5-pgsql
thanks
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:32:35PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> My first question would be if you can repeat same behaviour under unstable
> (and/or wheezy).
Before going forward to wheeze, I first tried to reproduce it on clean
squ
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:32:35PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> My first question would be if you can repeat same behaviour under unstable
> (and/or wheezy).
I'll try and get back to you on that. (It'll take me a while to replicate
a machine and then upgrade it.)
--
2. That which causes joy
Package: php5-pgsql, postgresql-9.0
Version: 5.3.3-7+squeeze1, 9.0.4-1~bpo60+1
Severity: serious
Hi,
After the upgrade of one of our web servers to squeeze, coupled with
PostgreSQL 9 from squeeze-backports, the new pg_pconnect()-caused
connections seem to get created and left idling forever. When
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 12:10:07PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Package: php5-memcache
> Version: 3.0.4-4
> Severity: grave
>
> Hi,
>
> Something in the squeeze upgrade completely demolished one of our internal
> PHP applications... our class that extends Memcache and cal
Package: php5-memcache
Version: 3.0.4-4
Severity: grave
Hi,
Something in the squeeze upgrade completely demolished one of our internal
PHP applications... our class that extends Memcache and calls parent::get()
never returns from the call into memcache.so, whenever memcached is up.
If I stop the
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 08:12:44AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Package: freeradius
> Version: 2.1.10+dfsg-3
> Severity: serious
>
> See the build logs at
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=freeradius, dh_install
> fails trying to install radsniff which apparently isn't built for s
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 08:16:49PM +, Marcos Marado wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> The problem is in scotch, that changed all the binary names from
> scotch_$binary to just $binary (see [1]).
>
> The "gbase" in scotch is completely different than the one from the gbase
> package. My first idea woul
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:22:50PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Package: freeradius
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
>
> Please see the following links with included references to
> patches:
>
> http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2010-369
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 02:53:22PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > This behaviour seems to be a problem with grub-probe and its usage by the
> > default config scripts, because the simple most straightforward test fails
> > for one of the RAID devices:
> >
> > % sudo tune2fs -l /dev/md0 | grep UUID
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream patch
Hi there,
Ever since kernel 2.6.29 came out, several classes of sparc machines have
been unable to upgrade, because they would get stuck while initializing
the new NMI watchdog code.
The process of trying to figure it out is mostly docume
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 05:30:29PM +0100, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
> > Any chance of upgrading one of the buildds to 2.6.32 to see if it
> > helps?
>
> DSA told me that they do not want to run any non-standard (aka,
> non-Debian stable) kernel on these machines, not even for short
> tests. I'm n
On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 11:41:51AM +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> > > > > Josip, are you running lebrun these days? Can you try reproducing the
> > > > > failure there and getting more information about it (logs are not
> > > > > very
> > > > > informative)? I'm a bit reluctant to do a porter uplo
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 03:00:39PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 02:29:36PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > I've got two disks and a software RAID setup on the partition that holds
> > the /boot directory. I have several Linux software RAID partitions, base
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 10:42:24PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Maintainer: Josip Rodin
> Changed-By: Uwe Kleine-König
> Description:
> xvier - a "Four in a row" game
> Closes: 554987
> Changes:
> xvier (1.0-7.5) unstable; urgency=high
&g
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 11:13:02AM +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 01:33:47PM +1300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 18/01/10 at 23:59 +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 06:58:18AM +1300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > > Package: src:ruby1.9.1
> > > > Version: 1
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 10:52:55PM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>> OK, it works when I put it in the first block, where it first does setuid()
>> because of the delivery mode. Then the subprocess gets the group mail.
>
> You must be referring to the following.
>
> After giving this another good lo
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 07:44:07PM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Let's try the following patch. I do appreciate your help in testing it.
> It's not easy for me to test all possible permutations of distro-specific
> configurations, and platform-specific nuances, that float around.
>
> diff -U3 -
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 07:44:07PM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Let's try the following patch. I do appreciate your help in testing it.
> It's not easy for me to test all possible permutations of distro-specific
> configurations, and platform-specific nuances, that float around.
>
> diff -U3 -
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 07:13:38AM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
% id testmaildrop
uid=1006(testmaildrop) gid=1006(testmaildrop) groups=1006(testmaildrop)
uid=1006(testmaildrop) gid=0(root) groups=0(root)
That's the problem. After using -d, it changes the user but not the group.
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:02:31PM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>> % id testmaildrop
>> uid=1006(testmaildrop) gid=1006(testmaildrop) groups=1006(testmaildrop)
>> uid=1006(testmaildrop) gid=0(root) groups=0(root)
>> That's the problem. After using -d, it changes the user but not the group.
>> Can
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 05:54:56PM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Josip Rodin writes:
>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 07:13:50AM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>>> # authtest mr...@courier-mta.com
>>> Authentication succeeded.
>>>
>>> Authent
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 07:13:50AM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> # authtest mr...@courier-mta.com
> Authentication succeeded.
>
> Authenticated: mr...@courier-mta.com (uid 8, gid 12)
>Home Directory: /var/spool/maildir/mrsam
> Maildir: (none)
> Quota: (none)
> Encry
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 09:56:21PM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Christoph Anton Mitterer writes:
>> On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 12:29 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>>> This depends on the maildrop configuration, but generally setgroupid
>>> won't have any effect if maildrop is invoked as root, since
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 05:06:56PM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Not sure if this actually a hole or if I just misunderstand
> something,... but:
>
> In debian /usr/bin/maildrop ist installed:
> -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mail 163k Nov 9 01:11 /usr/bin/maildrop
>
> So I'd expect that the follo
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 01:14:47PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 03:00:39PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 02:29:36PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > > I've got two disks and a software RAID setup on the partition that holds
>
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 03:00:39PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 02:29:36PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > I've got two disks and a software RAID setup on the partition that holds
> > the /boot directory. I have several Linux software RAID partitions, base
Hi,
I've reported this bug in the Debian BTS, to no avail, so I'm cc:ing the
upstream address for help.
I've got two disks and a software RAID setup on the partition that holds
the /boot directory. I have several Linux software RAID partitions, based
on this scheme:
sda2+sdb2 -> Linux amd6
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 02:29:36PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> I've got two disks and a software RAID setup on the partition that holds
> the /boot directory. I have several Linux software RAID partitions, based
> on this scheme:
>
> sda2+sdb2 -> Linux amd64 /
> s
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 11:04:38AM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Dec 2009 09:16:57 +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > unless this code somehow inexplicalby crept in, there's no bug.
>
> please check your linking process, so that there is no uncertainty
> about th
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 01:49:51AM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Package: grub-pc
> Severity: grave
>
> I'm typing this from Windows because the squeeze upgrade a few minutes ago
> rendered all my Linux GRUB menu entries useless - they all report "command
> not foun
Package: grub-pc
Severity: grave
I'm typing this from Windows because the squeeze upgrade a few minutes ago
rendered all my Linux GRUB menu entries useless - they all report "command
not found" either for "linux" or for "initrd".
During the upgrade, I saw three debconf prompts, and just pressed e
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 11:04:46PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 10:17:51PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 08:17:04PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 07:43:00PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
>
On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 08:17:04PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 07:43:00PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > Package: xvier
> > Version: 1.0-7.4
> > Severity: grave
> >
> > Hello Josip,
> >
> > This is on lenny-amd64:
> &g
On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 09:17:01PM +0100, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> update-alternatives fails because the binary in the unstable archive doesn't
> ship /usr/bin/*.maildrop:
>
> dpkg -$ dpkg -c /var/cache/apt/archives/maildrop_2.2.0-2_i386.deb | grep
> usr\/bin
> drwxr-xr-x root/root
On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 07:43:00PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Package: xvier
> Version: 1.0-7.4
> Severity: grave
>
> Hello Josip,
>
> This is on lenny-amd64:
> xvier crash when clicking on the fourth row with
> "xvier: read from xvier_prog failed"
Hmm, it's actually randomly crashing, I've
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:54:21AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> I've experienced the same problem. I've got two lenny machines which have
[...]
FWIW Here's the last upgrade output pasted exactly as it just happened:
% sudo apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Buildi
Package: grub-pc
Version: 1.97~beta3-1
Justification: renders package unusable
Severity: grave
Hi,
I've upgraded from lenny to sid and tried to chainload, but sadly the new
version won't do anything useful for me. This is what it prints:
Booting 'Chainload into GRUB 2'
root (hd0,1)
Filesyst
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 08:36:55PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> severity 524185 serious
> thanks
>
> This just happened to me after an upgrade from lenny to current sid,
> and it's damned annoying. I've logged into the machine over the network
> and did a sudo killall
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 09:42:24AM -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
> >>It seems that the new 0.15 upstream uses GTK2. I have packaged up the
> >>new upstream and put it here:
> >>http://people.debian.org/~bdefreese/gentoo/
> >>
> >>Hope you can use it. I know you have RFA'd the package but if you c
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 12:06:54AM -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
> It seems that the new 0.15 upstream uses GTK2. I have packaged up the
> new upstream and put it here:
> http://people.debian.org/~bdefreese/gentoo/
>
> Hope you can use it. I know you have RFA'd the package but if you could
> ge
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 12:28:18AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > > So you're saying that X working is more important than machines
> > > actually booting at all? These priorities are wrong.
> >
> > When N (where N > 0) users complain about dead X, and 0 users complain
> > about not being able to
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 04:58:08PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> So you're saying that X working is more important than machines
> actually booting at all? These priorities are wrong.
When N (where N > 0) users complain about dead X, and 0 users complain
about not being able to boot, the prioritie
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 09:36:39AM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> 1. Install the kernel package from http://people.debian.org/~gaudenz/sparc
>and test if this fixes the problem. This is the same kernel as currently
>in unstable with the problematic change removed. Please also test this
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 02:53:46PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 14:48:42 +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Oh, and we already have one in 488669, but it's filed against the core
> > X server package. I'll leave it to the X guys to decide where to merg
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 02:38:04PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 01:16:35PM +0200, Ludovic Court?s wrote:
> > Jim Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Ludovic Court?s wrote:
> > >> The current Xorg and ATI driver appear to not wor
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 01:16:35PM +0200, Ludovic Court?s wrote:
> Jim Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Ludovic Court?s wrote:
> >> The current Xorg and ATI driver appear to not work when used with
> >> `linux-image-2.6.25-2-sparc64' on an Ultra 5:
> >>
> >> X.Org X Server 1.4.2
> >>
> >
Package: xserver-xorg-video-mach64
Version: 6.8.0-1
Severity: grave
Hi,
With an older kernel, the old version of this driver worked fine.
After a kernel upgrade, it stopped working, with a couple of error
messages screaming something about memory allocation.
Hearing something about how I have to
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-sparc64-smp
Version: 2.6.26-4
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream
Hi,
qla2xxx's firmware loading thingy got hosed between .25 and .26,
I've already reported something along these lines to upstream, but I just
verified it with our kernel image so I'm filing it here too.
[
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 07:26:38PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > But, in such an (unlikely) court battle the onus would be on them to
> > prove that the stuff they committed was both copyrightable in the first
> > place as well as not infringing on previous work (which they apparently
> > didn't have
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 05:42:12AM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> > Obviously the implicit copyright "all rights reserved" would apply by
> > default,
> > but given that all contributions were explicitly published by all of the
> > authors, I think that considering the work to be released into
;
> Authors mentioned in the release notes:
>
> Josip Rodin (joy)
Why do I have to be on top of the list of copyright mischief?! ;)
I believe that the unanimous attitude of all editors of this document has
always been that they don't have any particular reason or right to restrain
us
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 01:46:23PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> tag 479185 + moreinfo
> severity 479185 important
> thanks
>
> this fails with 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3. At least 4.1 wasn't changed at all,
> so I assume the main reason is not GCC, but something else. The
> configury of this package uses
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 08:48:20PM +0200, Jan Christoph Nordholz wrote:
> Hi Josip,
>
> > Okay, I would be happy to try and narrow it down some more - just give me
> > more hints where to look... what would be next - terminfo? locales?
>
> good news: I think I've found it. Could you please verify
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 01:26:40PM +0200, Jan Christoph Nordholz wrote:
> Hi Josip,
>
> > Ha, found it - it's just one setting:
> >
> > XTerm*termName: xterm-debian
> >
> > The first step to reproduce can be changed to:
> >
> > xrdb -remove && xrdb -merge rxvt-bug.Xresources && rxvt
>
> even w
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 09:51:51PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:21:23PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > I've run into the bug again a few times, but most recently on a rather
> > inconspicuous bit - just scrolling within one single message crashed rx
Package: phpldapadmin
Version: 0.9.8.3-8
Severity: serious
Hi,
The other day I was unpleasantly surprised that the setting:
$ldapservers->SetValue($i,'auto_number','mechanism','uidpool');
the equivalent of which worked normally in sarge, doesn't actually work
on etch, but is still part of the c
1 - 100 of 190 matches
Mail list logo
