Thank you for your time. You may upload the package to the no delay queue, I
will check it when I have free time.
On September 10, 2024 11:00:47 AM GMT+01:00, Andreas Tille
wrote:
>Control: tags -1 pending
>Thanks
>
>Hi Jose,
>
>your package rep-gtk was showing up in the list of candidates for
Thank you for your work. No need for the delay.
Kind regards.
Jose M Calhariz
On December 3, 2023 1:14:09 PM GMT+00:00, Tobias Frost wrote:
>Control: tags 1055253 + patch
>Control: tags 1055253 + pending
>
>Dear maintainer,
>
>I've prepared an NMU for amanda (version
Hi, I believe my last update fixed the problem can someone double check?
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On July 7, 2023 11:26:22 AM GMT+01:00, Jose M Calhariz
wrote:
>I too think it's a race condition. I made some changes to the test but the
>upload to Debian did not went well.
>
I too think it's a race condition. I made some changes to the test but the
upload to Debian did not went well.
On July 6, 2023 2:12:59 PM GMT+01:00, Vincent Lefevre
wrote:
>On 2023-07-05 18:58:13 +0200, Johannes Christ wrote:
>> Is there another way to reproduce this issue?
>
>I'm wondering wh
fix.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On 3/15/23 18:29, Kamil Jońca wrote:
Jose M Calhariz writes:
On 3/13/23 13:16, Kamil Jońca wrote:
"Debian Bug Tracking System" writes:
Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian.
You can follow progress on this Bug here: 1032884:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo
Hi Barry,
Can you please open a new bug report for this problem?
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On February 23, 2023 9:40:53 PM GMT+00:00, Barry Trent
wrote:
>I applied this update to my one remaining buster machine and now it is
>refusing to connect to my bullseye-based amanda backup
Hi, just to tell that I am working on CVE-2022-37705, currently checking if the
fix work on my workbench.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On February 15, 2023 11:10:25 PM GMT+00:00, Amanda Trusted
wrote:
>Hi Jose,
>
>Here are the relevant bug fixes -
>[0] CVE - http
Hi,
This is my first security update, can I ask what is the procedure or where is
documented?
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On January 28, 2023 12:59:09 PM GMT+00:00, Salvatore Bonaccorso
wrote:
>Source: amanda
>Version: 1:3.5.1-9
>Severity: grave
>Tags: security upstream
&g
Hi,
thank you for the patch, I am working to validate that everything works.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On 21/08/2021 19:04, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> control: tag -1 + ftbfs
> control: severity -1 serious
>
> On 2020-10-18 15:19, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> Source: amanda
>
Hi,
You have my blessing for the NMU. If it helps, you may remove from
DELAYED/14 and upload it
to normal queue.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On 29/09/2020 20:03, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + patch pending
>
> Hi,
>
> I've uploaded a minimal fix to DELA
this problem.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On 22/10/17 12:22, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> I am OK to wait for the upload
>
> On 22 October 2017 13:26:56 EEST, Jose M Calhariz wrote:
>> That is an old problem of amanda that is solved on v3.5. But the error
>> messages are usuall
stretch on amd64.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On 09/10/17 06:55, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> Package: amanda-server
> Version: 1:3.3.9-5
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> If one or more backup host is unreachable, the backup of all
be a problem, particularly as Ubuntu has
> made a release with something based on 1:3.3.9-1. It looks like we need
> to add a Breaks on the perl side to make sure broken combinations can't
> happen.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I investigated this defect and I do not understand what went wrong
because a recompile make it work again.
This package have a pending upload to fix the build with openssl 1.1.0.
Can you downgrade to testing?
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On 10/11/16 08:49, Kamil Jonca wrote:
> Package: ama
Hi, it seems a perl upgrade break Amanda. While I work on problem you may try
to downgrade perl.
Kind regards
Jose M Calhariz
On October 2, 2016 8:01:23 PM GMT+01:00, SZALAY Attila wrote:
>Package: amanda-server
>Version: 1:3.3.9-1
>Severity: normal
>File: amanda
>
&
st the perl5 fix, until the new package can be reviewed and
> sponsored? I'd be happy to do the former.
Are you still available to review a new version of amanda? I have
acknowledge the NMU work and publish the last changes in collab-maint.
>
> Apologies again for the late notice of
ppy to do the former.
That is very good. Please do a NMU, and I will prepare a new release
after the NMU. Better if you sponsor the new release.
>
> Jose, could you please tell us about the status and your plans here?
>
>
> Cheers,
> gregor, this time with an explicit cc
&g
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 11:38:03AM +0100, Michał Pokrywka wrote:
> Any chance we'll see patched amanda in jessie?
> This seems like a really simple patch, can't break anything.
>
I have prepared a new package that is waiting for my sponsor, to
upload it.
Jose M Calhari
+ (5.01-2~cal1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Binary rebuild
Author: Jose M Calhariz
Bug:
http://forum.canardpc.com/threads/83443-Memtest86-V5.01-crashes-with-gcc-4.7.2-or-later
Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=753627
---
The information
20 matches
Mail list logo
