On 20-Jun-2012, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
| Looks like these valgrind errors are generated by the JVM and not by the
| java package. They are probably not a cause of concern.
|
| I don't know how to generate a difference in the valgrind logs, and I
| don't have one between OpenJDK 6 and 7.
|
| T
On 20-Jun-2012, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
| "John W. Eaton" writes:
|
| > I'd like to help debug this problem but I need some help.
|
| Thanks for volunteering!
|
| > I need to be able to install a debug version of Octave (preferably the
| > current development sou
On 9-Jun-2012, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
| Package: octave-java
| Version: 1.2.8-4
| Severity: grave
| Tags: sid
|
| This version of octave-java completely breaks octave.
|
| For example, if octave-io is also installed, octave miserably fails at launch
| time:
|
| octave: lex.ll :2420 : void h
Hi,
Did you see the following message from me? I think I found the reason
that libranlib.la is not being built, and a relatively simple fix.
jwe
On 25-Oct-2011, John W. Eaton wrote:
| On 24-Oct-2011, John W. Eaton wrote:
|
| | On 24-Oct-2011, Thomas Weber wrote:
| |
| | | On Thu, Sep 01
On 24-Oct-2011, John W. Eaton wrote:
| On 24-Oct-2011, Thomas Weber wrote:
|
| | On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 09:03:57PM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote:
| | > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:24:17PM -0400, John W. Eaton wrote:
| | > > If you don't want to change octlibdir, then you can ch
On 24-Oct-2011, Thomas Weber wrote:
| On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 09:03:57PM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote:
| > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:24:17PM -0400, John W. Eaton wrote:
| > > If you don't want to change octlibdir, then you can change the lines
| > > like
| > >
On 1-Sep-2011, Thomas Weber wrote:
| On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:24:17PM -0400, John W. Eaton wrote:
|
| > Is the current problem that the libraries are placed in a directory
| > that has a version number in the name, or does dpkg-shlibeps not find
| > files in subdirectories of /usr/l
On 23-Aug-2011, Thomas Weber wrote:
| On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 02:28:54PM -0400, John W. Eaton wrote:
| > On 19-Aug-2011, Thomas Weber wrote:
| >
| > | The problem is that dpkg-shlibdeps doesn't like the fact that Octave
| > | uses normal SONAMEs for its libraries now, but ships
On 19-Aug-2011, Thomas Weber wrote:
| The problem is that dpkg-shlibdeps doesn't like the fact that Octave
| uses normal SONAMEs for its libraries now, but ships them in a private
| path (so dpkg-shlibdeps doesn't find them and aborts).
| So, I'm reading through far too many books/tutorials about
On 1-Feb-2010, Thomas Weber wrote:
| On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 03:59:25PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
| > Hi!
| >
| > > octave-specfun is currently uninstallable in sid, as it depends on
| > > libhdf5-1.8.3, while octave3.2 depends on libhdf5-1.8.4.
| > > Please rebuild octave-specfun against libh
On 16-Jun-2009, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
| * Rafael Laboissiere [2009-06-15 21:55]:
|
| > * John W. Eaton [2009-06-15 13:25]:
| >
| > > On 15-Jun-2009, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
| > >
| > > | Anyway, it is funny to see how long this bug lived in the code and was
| &g
On 15-Jun-2009, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
| Anyway, it is funny to see how long this bug lived in the code and was
| just awakened by the crappy mips/mipsel architecture...
Also strange that it didn't show up until now, even on mips. Maybe a
compiler change?
jwe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 15-Jun-2009, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
| Attached below is a patch for pr-output.cc that makes Octave work as
| expected for 'complex(NaN,0)' on mips (and amd64 as well, FWIW). The
| package is being built right now on mips and on amd64 and, if everything
| goes well on both arches, I will upl
On 11-Jun-2009, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
| * John W. Eaton [2009-06-11 15:42]:
|
| > Did you compile the simpler program with the same options used to
| > build Octave?
|
| Probably not.
|
| > Can you run Octave under gdb and find where it hangs, either by
| > running
| &
On 11-Jun-2009, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
| * John W. Eaton [2009-06-11 11:27]:
|
| > So first, can you determine precisely where Octave is actually
| > hannging? Does the following program work, or does it also hang in
| > the same way?
| >
| > #include
| > #inclu
On 11-Jun-2009, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
| * Rafael Laboissiere [2009-06-11 16:07]:
|
| > * Rafael Laboissiere [2009-06-11 01:08]:
| >
| > > * Peter De Schrijver [2009-06-10 19:40]:
| > >
| > > > Package: octave3.2
| > > > Version: 3.2.0-1
| > > > Severity: serious
| > > >
| > > > There wa
On 23-Apr-2009, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
| * Thomas Weber [2009-04-22 23:04]:
|
| > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:01:19PM +0200, Laurent Mazet wrote:
| > > Package: octave3.0
| > > Version: 1:3.0.1-7
| > > Arch: i386
| > > Severity: grave
| > >
| > > Hi,
| > >
| > > I've just realized that I can m
On 9-Apr-2009, Drew Parsons wrote:
| Hi Rafael, thanks for the forthcoming fix to the problem.
|
| About the severity, I appreciate you need to get the new version across
| to testing but I don't think I could justify it with this bug.
I agree that we should limit the spread of 3.0.4 as much as
On 10-Apr-2007, Thomas Weber wrote:
| Package: octave2.9
| Version: 2.9.10-4
| Severity: grave
| Justification: renders package unusable
|
| Octave 2.9.10 doesn't play well with the current octave2.9-forge packages in
| Debian, so it shouldn't enter testing in the current state.
I think this is
On 10-Mar-2006, LUK ShunTim wrote:
| I'm experiencing random crashes of octave 2.9.4 on a debian/sid box. I
| apt-get the source and rebuild with debug on and here is the backtrace.
|
|
|
| $ gdb octave
| GNU gdb 6.4-debian
| Copyright 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
| GDB is free software,
On 15-Sep-2005, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
| * John W. Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-14 02:07]:
|
| > On 10-Sep-2005, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
| >
| > | John, could you please confirm that this would fix the bug?
| >
| > Looking at the code, I think it will avoid the
On 10-Sep-2005, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
| John, could you please confirm that this would fix the bug?
Looking at the code, I think it will avoid the problem.
Thanks,
jwe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 9-Sep-2005, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
| Here is the build with g++-3.4. It is worse than with g++-4.0 (6
| failures instead of 2).
Odd. My results were:
3.3: all tests pass
3.4: all tests pass
4.0: 1 failed (FAIL: octave.test/arith/coth-1.m)
My system is Debian testing, updated to t
On 9-Sep-2005, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
| > Is libstdc++ also completely compatible? Have there been absolutely
| > no changes that could affect layout of class members?
|
| This question is no longer a concern since my tests have shown that g++
| 3.4 is worse than g++ 4.0.
But unless we are abs
On 9-Sep-2005, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
| Too bad :<. Did you submit bugs to the gcc or Debian BTS (I looked
| rapidly and did not find a relevant bug) ?
No, sorry, I didn't.
| g++ 3.4 could also be used as a fallback since it is ABI-compatible with
| g++ 4.0.
Is libstdc++ also completely compa
On 7-Sep-2005, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
| octave needs to be recompiled with g++ 4.0 and a newer libhdf5:
The last time I tried compiling Octave with g++ 4.0 (actually 4.0.1),
Octave failed several of its tests. So maybe g++ 4.0 is not quite
ready yet?
jwe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
26 matches
Mail list logo
