Bug#828606: xmlsec1: diff for NMU version 1.2.23-0.1

Looks good, thank you Sebastian. On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior < sebast...@breakpoint.cc> wrote: > Control: tags 828606 + patch > Control: tags 828606 + pending > > Dear maintainer, > > I've prepared an NMU for xmlsec1 (versioned as 1.2.23-0.1) and > uploaded it to D

Bug#559831: closed by (John V. Belmonte) (Bug#559831: fixed in xmlsec1 1.2.14-1)

close 559831 stop On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote: > i don't think that this has been resolved since there are no depends on > libtool in your control file. On closer investigation It turns out that Debian xmlsec1 is not affected by CVE-2009-3736 since we don't enable dyna

Bug#430272: Maybe a false positive

Enrico Tassi wrote: > 1) Do plain lua (with no LUA_NUMBER redefinition) use long double? >For sure not in the interface, didn't check the internals but I guess >no. > > 2) Do these archs need long double (128 bit) to be "aligned"? >If they need alignement of 16 bytes, and lua uses long

Bug#430272: Maybe a false positive

Enrico Tassi wrote: > There is not API using long double, but there is some interesting > message in the header file (the configuration one). > > You probably know more than me about alignment in these archs... > > /* > @@ LUAI_USER_ALIGNMENT_T is a type that requires maximum alignment. > *

Bug#379390: fixed in xmlsec1 1.2.9-4

Adeodato Simó wrote: > found 379390 1.2.9-4 > thanks > > Hi John, > >> xmlsec1 (1.2.9-4) unstable; urgency=low >> . >>* Fix gnutls dependency in shlibs.local (Closes: #379390) > > I'm afraid this is not really a good fix. Could you please drop your > shlibs.local file instead, as Andreas sugg