I'm not aware of any alternative for javascript coverage packaged in
debian. So if possible I would like to keep it in unstable.
Sure, it doesn't seem upstream is actively developing it anymore.
On Sep 2, 2012 1:39 AM, "David Prévot" wrote:
> Control: found -1 0.3.1-1
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 08:51:40PM +0100, Johan Euphrosine wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 8:39 P
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Enrico Zini wrote:
> Hello,
>
> thank you for maintaining jscoverage.
>
> jscoverage 0.3.1-1 is currently in squeeze and sid and has RC bugs open
> against it.
>
> Considering that the package has a very small number of users, that
> we're supposed to release fairl
Mozilla folks announced that a parser API for JavaScript has landed in
SpiderMonkey:
http://blog.mozilla.com/dherman/2010/08/25/an-api-for-parsing-javascript/
Pinging upstream about it.
--
Johan Euphrosine (proppy)
Development and services around Free Software
http://www.aminche.com
.js-engine (as advised by irc.mozilla.org
#jsapi folks), to ask for the current status of this work.
--
Johan Euphrosine (proppy)
Development and services around Free Software
http://www.aminche.com/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
erpreting, JavaScript. Unfortunately the parsing functions are not
"public" and could possibly change any time the library is upgraded.
I think the above qualifies as a good reason to allow static linking.
"""
I was wondering it debian would allow static linking in t
age-0.5/instrument-js.cpp:2041: undefined reference to
`JSCompiler::~JSCompiler()'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [jscoverage] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/jscoverage-0.5'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/jscoverage-0.5'
make: *** [all] Error 2
How could I fix this issue ?
--
Johan Euphrosine (proppy)
Development and services around Free Software
http://www.aminche.com/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
I believe the attached debdiff should correct FTBFS on mips.
Please tell me if it needs additional love.
--
Johan Euphrosine
diff -u unittest++-1.4.0/debian/changelog unittest++-1.4.0/debian/changelog
--- unittest++-1.4.0/debian/changelog
+++ unittest++-1.4.0/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:05 PM, Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Johan,
>
> I was looking to see if I could help by sponsoring the upload of that package.
> However, check out the differences with the current version in Debian:
>
> 1311 files changed, 172664 insertions(+), 35937 d
/debian/unstable/src/
--
Johan Euphrosine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/jpoker-1.0.14$ debuild -us -uc
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -D -us -uc
dpkg-buildpackage: set CPPFLAGS to default value:
dpkg-buildpackage: set CFLAGS to default value: -g -O2
dpkg-buildpackage: set CXXFL
This can be easily fixed by installing build-essential package.
tags 473562 wontfix
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 1:31 PM, OuoU Loic Dachary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: jpoker
> Version: 1.0.8-1
> Severity: serious
>
> dpkg-source: warning: Couldn't determine gcc system type, falling back
close 473562
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Johan Euphrosine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This can be easily fixed by installing build-essential package.
>
> tags 473562 wontfix
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 1:31 PM, OuoU Loic Dachary <[EMAIL PROTECTED
12 matches
Mail list logo
