I can confirm the issue and the fix, installing libglvnd0 package.
Cheers.
Javier
Hi,
mercurial 4.0-1 failed to build on armhf because
test-largefiles-update.t failed[0]. I've tested it on a porterbox ten
times and I can't reproduce the error. Can you please give it back
for armhf and see if it was a transient error in the testsuite?
gb mercurial_4.0-1 . armhf
[0]
https://
yway, it's just a
> "lets be nice and clean up if we can" kind of thing.
>
> In your very obscure case that noone else triggered so far there
> is no directory to clean up anyway, so don't worry! :P
For the record, I've triggered this today when upgrading an aarch64
chroot. Maybe it's not that obscure ;)
Cheers,
Javi
"/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/mercurial/commands.py", line 5426, in
> push
>opargs=opts.get('opargs'))
> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/mercurial/extensions.py", line 183,
> in closure
>return func(*(args + a), **kw)
> F
r of ITPs for
ipython/jupyter packages recently, so maybe he's also considering the
transition to ipython 4.0.0.
Cheers,
Javi
t callable
Argh, yes, mercurial-git 0.8.1 doesn't work with hg 3.5. When I
uploaded mercurial-git 0.8.1-2, I thought the breaks in mercurial
would still be valid (but I didn't check it, and I should have).
Sorry for that.
I was waiting for a new version of mercurial-git to be released, but
given that I've already broken it, I may backport the fix and release
a 0.8.1-3 that is compatible with mercurial 3.5.
Cheers,
Javi
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
orting your packaging of python-sk1libs and
python-uniconvertor into the Python Modules team and fixing #699301 at
last. In your email you state that you don't want to adopt the
package but python-sk1libs/debian/control shows you as maintainer.
Are you ok with me changing that to the Debian Python Modules team?
Cheers,
Javi
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
to reproduce this with mercurial 3.0. In any case, that
patch is part of mercurial 3.0.1, which I'll upload soon.
Cheers,
Javi
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: klavaro
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
klavaro is uninstallable in sid:
$ aptitude install klavaro
The following NEW packages will be installed:
klavaro{b}
0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 37 not upgraded.
Need to get 780 kB of archives.
piled
without optimizations so it fails but in 0.4.0 it's compiled with -O2,
the code is optimized out and the build succeeds.
I'm going to upload 0.3.1-2.2 to TPU (delayed/5) which fixes this and
#699102.
Cheers,
Javi
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: python-greenlet
Version: 0.3.1-2.2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
The FTBFS in sparc[0] in wheezy can be fixed by applying the attached
patch
[0]
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=python-greenlet&arch=sparc&ver=0.3.1-2.2&stamp=1359234024
Cheers,
Stefano Rivera wrote:
> ==
> FAIL: test_sanitize_remove_src_javascript
> (genshi.filters.tests.html.HTMLSanitizerTestCase)
> --
> Traceback (most recent call last
test than a new bug.
None of the changes from 2.1.2-1 to 2.1.2-2 should affect these tests, so
that's actually 2 successful builds out of 5. On some architectures the
testsuite is unreliable. If this happens again, I'll probably stop
running it on kfreebsd-amd64.
Cheers,
Javi
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 06:32:12PM -0500, Patrick Ouellette wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 10:16:19PM +0000, Javi Merino wrote:
> >
> > Package: ax25-apps
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Jeff White was contacted in June 2011 asking him to relicence the code
> &
y_dir="$X"
break
fi
done
done
---
libslang2-dev installs libslang.so in
/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libslang.so (in an i386 machine) but configure
is not looking for it in there because it's not multiarch aware.
Cheers,
Javi
-
severity 610894 important
thanks
Though it's an important bug, there's a workaround for the data loss
it may create. Downgrading accordingly. Cheers, Javi
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ny host, too. But I have to look again
> whether I used a different version of pure-ftpd, or not.
Dropping severity to important as it is "a bug which has a major
effect on the usability of a package, without rendering it completely
unusable to everyone."
Cheers,
Javi
signature
tags 632604 unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
I built it in my real i386 machine just fine.
Cheers,
Javi
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: ax25-apps
Hi,
Jeff White was contacted in June 2011 asking him to relicence the code
but he didn't reply. This package should be moved to non-free.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.4
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (800, 'stable'), (600, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable-updates'
Filed for removal http://bugs.debian.org/662055
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tags 622353 - security
severity 622353 normal
thanks
> Please file this upstream (reproducible with firefox 4.0), but I don't think
> this has much security implication.
Agreed, this isn't a security bug. Lowering the priority.
Cheers,
Javi
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
reassign 617549 xserver-xorg-driver-ati
severity 617549 important
thanks
dpdt1 wrote:
> i thought it was an xorg error so i removed xserver-xorg-driver-ati and
> using only radeon driver now. (ati radeon X300 vga)
> rebooting desktop i can now start zapping app normally.
> (so maybe you can remove
ith that version, even if the commit finished correctly it may be
corrupt. Please use "hg verify" to check that everything is correct.
Can you update to 2.0-2 when that's available for armel?
Cheers,
Javi (Vicho)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
roblem, and we can tell
people to set alignment to 2 in order to use mercurial for the time
being.
If it's definitely an alignment problem, we can add that to the bug
upstream[0] and see what mercurial devs have to say about it.
[0] http://mercurial.selenic.com/bts/issue2877
Thanks!
Jav
ase upgrade your package and see if it works?
It would really help if you could run the whole mercurial test suite.
To do that, download the sources from [0] unpack them and run "make
tests". It will probably take hours to execute.
[0] http://mercurial.selenic.com/release/mercurial-1.9.2.tar.gz
Thanks,
Javi (Vicho)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
the output of the following command:
>
> $ ls -ld /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages
> ls: cannot access /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages: No such file or directory
As expected. The question is what is installed there in the system of
Simon (the original reporter).
Thanks for testing the upgrade,
Javi (Vicho)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
x27;m unable to reproduce the bug with 1.6.2-2
Thanks,
Javi (Vicho)
> 2010/8/28 Javi Merino
>
>> Hi Romain,
>>
>> On 26/08/10 14:06, Romain Lerallut wrote:
>>> It seems that the patches in debian/patches are not applied when building
>> the
>>> package.
Hi Romain,
On 26/08/10 14:06, Romain Lerallut wrote:
> It seems that the patches in debian/patches are not applied when building the
> package. Anyway, the url.py file is not patched and the problem persists.
Can you please confirm that it is now fixed in 1.6.2-2?
Thanks,
Javi
n/patches are not applied when building
>> the
>> package. Anyway, the url.py file is not patched and the problem persists.
>
> Javi, do you have the time to investigate ?
Yes, I'm working on it right now.
Hopefully soon I will have an upload ready. I still need your spo
and see if it builds in ppc?
Thank you,
Javi Merino (Vicho)
[0]
http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/ltrace.git;a=commit;h=a7af00db2231e99a4506e4f5587f9dd00b9d1175
[1] http://ftp.es.debian.org/debian/pool/main/l/ltrace/ltrace_0.5.3.orig.tar.gz
[2] http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/mai
&ver=0.5.3-2&arch=powerpc&stamp=1248609059&file=log
Regards,
Javi Merino (Vicho)
diff -pruN 0.5.3-2/sysdeps/linux-gnu/ppc/plt.c 0.5.3-2ubuntu3/sysdeps/linux-gnu/ppc/plt.c
--- 0.5.3-2/sysdeps/linux-gnu/ppc/plt.c 2009-07-25 16:13:02.0 +0100
+++ 0.5.3-2ubuntu3/sysdeps/linux-gnu/ppc
Package: linphone
Version: 1.0.1-2
Followup-For: Bug #301494
Hi.
For me linphone used to crash on startup. Same segfault as reported. I solved
the problem by upgrading
libortp0 (it seems I had libortp0 0.12.2-1 installed).
Hope it helps.
Thanks.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
AP
32 matches
Mail list logo
