On 15 December 2017 at 15:13, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> 2017-12-15 15:05 GMT+01:00 Matthias Klose :
>> Control: reopen -1
>> Control: reassign -1 ldc
>>
>> On 15.12.2017 13:53, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
>>> 2017-12-15 9:46 GMT+01:00 Matthias Klose :
[...]
>>
>> ok, but then the issue is in ldc, s
On 24 April 2017 at 20:04, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Here is a short summary on the bug:
>
> 1) It only happens on Debian buildds, Fedora and Arch are not
> affected. I examined the build logs and the environments are
> relatively similar, with a notable difference for Fedora being that
> t
On 9 April 2015 at 16:37, Tim wrote:
> Package: libphobos-5-dev
> Version: 5-20150205
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I assume that at the time, gcc-5-base had an 0205 version, but being
> experimental, has moved on, and left gdc/phobos behind,
BSD, for that matter!)
>
> Could you please take a look, and check for other affected files?
>
> Thanks!
>
Hi Aaron,
This has been fixed in upstream development prior to you emailing in.
Guess we'll see this trickle down into gdc-4.8.1 ...
Regards
--
Iain Buclaw
*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
st it.
As for the bumping of gdc, has only been recently done, see link for current
status.
https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=gdc-4.3<https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=gdc-4.3>
When it is uploaded for your architecture, update the package, then try
again. If problems persist, don'
On 16 May 2010 01:31, Daniel Gibson wrote:
> On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>
> > That indeed it is, and I've been aware of it for a while.
> > I actually fixed this with the patch in bug 581240 - hitting two birds
> with
> > one stone.
&g
ddresses two things.
1) Create a cgraph node only if a function requires a static chain - we
don't care if the tree code isn't FUNCTION_DECL.
2) Omit frame pointers in naked functions (bug #581240).
I see you raised another bug in libphobos, I'll have a look at that first
before letting
On 13 May 2010 09:46, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>
> I'm happy to say this is resolved (for me). Attaching updated
> gdc-4.3.dpatch which addresses the issue.
>
>
And a patch against debian's gccsvn ( for the lazy ;).
--
Iain Buclaw
*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + &#
$ gdmd-4.3 -unittest md5test.d && ./md5test
900150983CD24FB0D6963F7D28E17F72
I'm happy to say this is resolved (for me). Attaching updated gdc-4.3.dpatch
which addresses the issue.
Regards
--
Iain Buclaw
*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
gdc-4.3.dpatch
Description: Binary data
off asm in std.md5 seems like a likely
quick-fix for the time being. Just comparing, GCC can produce the rol opcode
from shifts. Actually, produces _exactly_ the same code as the inline
assembly in the D file (with the exception of a different call frame setup).
So is not likely we are loosing any optim
Hi, am aware of this and have raised a bug in gdc.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=577721
Already have the issue resolved, will upload later this week.
Regards
--
Iain Buclaw
*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
c.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3854
The way that report is panning out, looks like this is a deliberate feature
of the language, so attached to this post is a patch to fix the source for
the language changes.
Regards
--
Iain Buclaw
*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
# Fix D langua
c.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3854
The way that report is panning out, looks like this is a deliberate feature
of the language, so attached to this post is a patch to fix the source for
the language changes.
Regards
--
Iain Buclaw
*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
# Fix D langua
13 matches
Mail list logo
