On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 11:02:23AM +1100, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-02-12 at 17:35 -0800, Gregory P. Smith wrote:
> > I've created an OpenSSL version of the sha module. trivial to modify
> > to be a md5 module. Its a first version with cleanup to be done and
>
I've created an OpenSSL version of the sha module. trivial to modify
to be a md5 module. Its a first version with cleanup to be done and
such. being managed in the SF patch manager:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1121611&group_id=5470&atid=305470
enjoy. i'll do more cleanu
> I think it would be cleaner and simpler to modify the existing
> md5module.c to use the openssl md5 layer API (this is just a
> search/replace to change the function names). The bigger problem is
> deciding what/how/whether to include the openssl md5 implementation
> sources so that win32 can use
> The md5.h/md5c.c files allow "copy and use", but no modification of
> the files. There are some alternative implementations, i.e. in glibc,
> openssl, so a replacement should be sage. Any other requirements when
> considering a replacement?
>
> Matthias
I believe the "plan" for md5 and sh
4 matches
Mail list logo
