Package: grub-efi-amd64-bin
Version: 1+2.06+3~deb11u4
Followup-For: Bug #1024395
X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@security.debian.org
Wanted to update and say that even with sb enabled, mok doesn't show up
with mokutil --list-enrolled. In my case this may be because mokutil
doesn't work with my mobo (ASUS X99-D
Package: grub-efi-amd64-bin
Version: 1+2.06+3~deb11u4
Followup-For: Bug #1024395
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
Hi Hideki,
Just did a dist-upgrade which included an upgrade to 003.02.01-4. It
installed without a hitch. Feel free to close.
Thanks!
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Hi Garrentt,
>
> On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 18:40:35 -0800
> Garrett McLean wrote:
> >
Package: ttf-takao-gothic
Version: 003.02.01-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I tried to upgrade today and this happened:
---
The following packages will be upgraded:
ttf-takao-gothic
1 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
Need to get 0
pending
> thanks
>
> I demand that Garrett McLean may or may not have written...
>
> > The problematic entry is at the end of the file:
> >
> > [/usr/lib/xine/plugins/1.25/xineplug_dmx_matroska.so]
> > size=35728
> > mtime=1236814787
> > type=2
> &g
pending
> thanks
>
> I demand that Garrett McLean may or may not have written...
>
> > The problematic entry is at the end of the file:
> >
> > [/usr/lib/xine/plugins/1.25/xineplug_dmx_matroska.so]
> > size=35728
> > mtime=1236814787
> > type=2
> &g
PS, removing that entry and putting that file back to ~/.xine/catalog.cache
also works splendidly.
-Garrett
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Garrett McLean wrote:
> The problematic entry is at the end of the file:
>
> [/usr/lib/xine/plugins/1.25/xineplug_dmx_matroska.so]
> size=3
nyway, and sorry!
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Garrett McLean wrote:
> That was indeed the problem. Old catalog.cache attached just in case it is
> useful.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 4:35 AM, Darren Salt <
> li...@youmustbejoking.demon.co.uk> w
That was indeed the problem. Old catalog.cache attached just in case it is
useful.
Thanks!
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 4:35 AM, Darren Salt <
li...@youmustbejoking.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> I demand that Garrett McLean may or may not have written...
>
> > Subject basically says
Package: libxine1
Version: 1.1.16.2-1+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Subject basically says it all. They crash whether or not they are asked to
play a file when called.
Happy to provide more info. gdb output from totem attached (I'm new at using
gdb, so sorry if this is
Core was generated by `gtkpod'.Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted.#0 0xb765d947 in raise () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6(gdb)bt #0 0xb765d947 in raise () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6#1 0xb765f0c9 in abort () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#2 0xb7692fda in __fsetlocking () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6#3 0xb76
Every time I try to run gtkpod, I get errors like this:compy[1001]:~% gtkpod*** glibc detected *** malloc(): memory corruption (fast): 0x084fcb10***zsh: abort gtkpodDowngrading DOESN'T help. Not sure if this is gtkpod or something else.
Happy to provide more info if needed. Thanks!-- System In
Sorry for any trouble I might have caused, I just did a fresh sid install from the etch beta 3 businesscard image and was confused about why I couldn't install gnome-media. Glad and not at all surprised to see that it's all under control and for a good reason. Thanks for the continued excellent wor
Package: libbonoboui2-0
Version: 2.14.0-1
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
Justification: renders package unusable
Subject line says it all. I'm stuck at the old version of
libbonoboui2-0 because I can't get an OLDER version of
libbonoboui2-common. Shouldn't the dep. be on versions of
libbonoboui2-com
According to the below, gnome-applets depends on a version of gnome-panel in experimental, so perhaps they need a bug report too? Either way, I can't install panel at all, so this bug remains valid.The following packages have unmet dependencies:
gnome-applets: Depends: gnome-panel (>= 2.12.1-1) b
I did use reportbug. It did not report the version of gnome-panel or its dependencies because I don't have a version of gnome-panel installed. I can fetch the versions that I would be installing if you like, but basically, they should be whatever version is in sid. I'm not using any speical pinning
Package: gnome-panel
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
Justification: renders package unusable
When apt-get install-ing gnome-core:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
gnome-panel: Depends: libecal1.2-2 (>= 1.2.2) which is a virtual package.
Depends: libgnome-menu0 which is a
Hi. I wanted to report that I am also having a similar problem with the
latest nvidia-kernel-source not building. I used m-a auto-install
nvidia, I have attached modass's error log.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Archi
18 matches
Mail list logo
