Bug#398638: w3c-markup-validator: postinst fails

2006-11-19 Thread Frederic Schutz
Hi Lucas, I have prepared a new revision (0.7.4-1) of the w3c-markup-validator package, which is available at http://www.mathgen.ch/debian/sib/ I reported a bug against wwwconfig-common (#399115), and a new version has been uploaded which allowed me to (hopefully) correct this bug. On my

Bug#398638: w3c-markup-validator: postinst fails

2006-11-17 Thread Frederic Schutz
Steve Langasek wrote: Your postinst runs under set -e, as it should, and then it sources /usr/share/wwwconfig-common/restart.sh (it does *not* execute it). That means any non-zero exit codes from restart.sh are going to propagate and result in the shell (i.e., the postinst) exiting non-zero.

Bug#398638: w3c-markup-validator: postinst fails

2006-11-16 Thread Frederic Schutz
Here is where I am with this bug. postinst calls /usr/share/wwwconfig-common/restart.sh, which itself calls /etc/init.d/apache2 restart. If the restart fails with exit value != 0, the execution of the scripts stops, thus making postinst fail. If I replace /usr/share/wwwconfig-common/restart.sh b

Bug#398638: w3c-markup-validator: postinst fails

2006-11-15 Thread Frederic Schutz
Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Have you been able to reproduce this outside of piuparts ? I tried to, but I really can't :-( I don't know what goes wrong inside piuparts. Yes: for example, if I stop apache2, and start another process that binds to port 80 (thus preventing the start of apache2), then p

Bug#398638: w3c-markup-validator: postinst fails

2006-11-15 Thread Frederic Schutz
So I have installed piuparts and have done several attempts at testing the package with a bit of debugging. I got two kind of failures. One of them seems to happen if postinst is not able to restart the web server; in this case, the script . /usr/share/wwwconfig-common/restart.sh is called fro

Bug#398638: w3c-markup-validator: postinst fails

2006-11-14 Thread Frederic Schutz
Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > The bug is likely to be caused by a missing depend/pre-depend. I'll try > to investigate it: please don't lower the priority for now, since it's > likely that somebody else will find some time to work on it. I am installing piuparts and will look into it. Thanks, Frederi

Bug#398638: w3c-markup-validator: postinst fails

2006-11-14 Thread Frederic Schutz
Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Please note that piuparts tests packages installation, not building. Sorry, I knew that but completely mixed everything. > The bug is likely to be caused by a missing depend/pre-depend. I'll try > to investigate it: please don't lower the priority for now, since it's > l

Bug#398638: w3c-markup-validator: postinst fails

2006-11-14 Thread Frederic Schutz
Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Hi, During a piuparts run over all the packages in etch, I ran into a problem with your package: Setting up w3c-markup-validator (0.7.3-1) ... dpkg: error processing w3c-markup-validator (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1

Bug#370671: [Fwd: Re: Can you repro with XOrg 7?]

2006-06-12 Thread Frederic Schutz
Johan Walles wrote: If the version that wants to go into testing resolves the problem for you, then it should go into testing. But since this is probably a bug in X.org which is just triggered by the Gnome panel, my guess is that the bug is triggered by both the version in Testing and in Unstab

Bug#370671: [Fwd: Re: Can you repro with XOrg 7?]

2006-06-12 Thread Frederic Schutz
Thanks Johan, I'll see what I can do. I note, however, that the latest version of gnome-applets is ready to go into testing (as indicated on the web page http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=gnome-applets), except for this release-critical bug. Since the bug was filled against the

Bug#370671: Can you repro with XOrg 7?

2006-06-10 Thread Frederic Schutz
Hi Johan, I see the exact same problem that Alexander noticed, and for me it actually appeared just _after_ the upgrade to XOrg 7 ! My version is: ii xorg 7.0.20 X.Org X Window System According to http://packages.qa.debian.org/x/xorg.html, xorg 7 actually migrated to testing/e

Bug#358901: w3c-markup-validator: Any validation fails with "Software error"

2006-05-07 Thread Frederic Schutz
On 4/28/06, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Steve, What are your plans for getting a new package uploaded to unstable that fixes this bug? Is the 0.7.2 package at http://www.mathgen.ch/debian/experimental/ suitable for upload sponsoring as-is? The package you mentioned above sho

Bug#358901: [Fwd: Re: Bug#358901: w3c-markup-validator: Any validation fails with "Software error"]

2006-04-03 Thread Frederic Schutz
Copy for reference Original Message Subject: Re: Bug#358901: w3c-markup-validator: Any validation fails with "Software error" Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 11:55:08 +0100 From: Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Frederic Schutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[E

Bug#358901: w3c-markup-validator: Any validation fails with "Software error"

2006-04-03 Thread Frederic Schutz
Mark wrote: Hi Mark, first, a suggestion: please reply to all when discussing about Debian bugs, and especially, cc the address @bugs.debian.org, so that a copy of the emails are kept for reference purposes. I downloaded the file. Did apt-get remove --purge w3c-markup-validator then dpkg -i

Bug#358901: w3c-markup-validator: Any validation fails with "Software error"

2006-03-31 Thread Frederic Schutz
On 3/25/06, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'll send you a URL for the test package as soon as I have it ready. > > Yes please. Good hunting with it and thank you for the prompt response! > This is my first Debian bug report. Can you try the package w3c-markup-validator_0.7.2-1_all.deb that

Bug#358901: w3c-markup-validator: Any validation fails with "Software error"

2006-03-24 Thread Frederic Schutz
Mark wrote: Hi Mark, > Software error: > > Cannot add named block to hash! Block occurs more than > once. > Turn on -MergeDuplicateBlocks or make sure occurs only once in the > config. > at /usr/lib/cgi-bin/check line 139 > BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/lib/cgi-bin/check line 19