On Saturday 07 August 2010, Neil McGovern wrote:
> As there isn't a resolution in sight, I'll add a hint at the end of
> August for the removal of the package unless there's significant
> progress to fixing the issue.
I still feel this is an overreaction as only the original reporter has ever
see
reassign 590993 debian-cd
severity 590993 normal
thanks
Since you are trying something that's not really supported, this is
certainly *not* a "grave" issue. After all, a CD image is not a mirror
even if both contain a repository.
It is correct that the error occurs because CD images have symlin
Steve Langasek wrote:
> This manual represents the opinion of a single developer.
And what does that have to do with the price of bananas in Iceland?
The fact that aptitude is currently the recommended tool for package
management has various reasons: user interface, features, dependency
handlin
On Tuesday 06 July 2010, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Frans Pop (06/07/2010):
> > The proposed fix could well be OK, but maybe the code can be fixed a
> > bit earlier so the trailing comma is avoided in the first place?
>
> Whatever unbreaks g-i.
Not really. There's also s
On Tuesday 06 July 2010, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> 5. Fix for real:
> Edit /var/lib/dpkg/info/keyboard-configuration.config, and add the
> following line in ask_debconf(), right before the if part, once all
> choices have been merged together:
> choices=`echo $choices | sed 's/,$//'`
reopen 505609
reassign 505609 linux-2.6
affects 505609 lilo
thanks
Stephen Powell wrote:
> The real question is, "Why didn't the map installer get run during
> the kernel upgrade?"
[...]
> So is this a bug in the kernel maintainer scripts? Or is it a feature?
> I don't know. I'll leave that up
severity 582223 normal
tags 582223 wontfix
thanks
On Wednesday 19 May 2010, Bastian Blank wrote:
> partman wants to overwrite the swap partitions on a already setup
> machine. As swap partition can contain hibernation data, this is an
> data-destroying operation.
Doing any system install while th
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-12
Severity: serious
Because of the IDE -> ATA transition for Squeeze the pata_cmd64x driver should
be enabled instead of the (old) cmd64x driver. AFAIK the pata_cmd64x has been
tested and is known to work correctly.
My system failed to boot after updrading to 2
reassign 579948 libparted0debian1 2.2-5
tags 579948 d-i
affects 579948 partman-base
thanks
On Sunday 02 May 2010, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> On Sun, May 02, 2010 at 03:57:48PM +0100, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> ~ # fdisk -l /dev/sdb
>
> Disk /dev/sdb (Sun disk label): 255 heads, 63 sectors, 8864 cylinders
>
On Wednesday 24 March 2010, Robert Lemmen wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 02:51:41PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> > This package should not be removed. The bug is partly theoretical and
> > only affects a minority of use cases.
>
> ok, so you think it should be squeeze-ignore? d
On Wednesday 24 March 2010, Robert Lemmen wrote:
> unless you object soon, i will suggest the removal of these packages
> from testing. the rationale is (a mixture of these will apply to the
> package in question)
This package should not be removed. The bug is partly theoretical and only
affects
Package: libklibc-dev
Version: 1.5.16-1
Severity: serious
The D-I package rootskel failed to build with this version and also after
upgrading to 1.5.17-2 because header files could not be found.
The cause was traced to the fact that instead of symlinks there are empty
directories:
$ ls -dl /usr/
On Wednesday 24 February 2010, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> So, after reading #570581, is this actually a fribidi or a newt bug ?
It can probably be argued that it's both :-)
In newt for not initializing and in fribidi for not terminating.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.deb
On Tuesday 23 February 2010, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> That's debconf right ?
>
> Both debconf & D-I use newt, am I right about this ?
Yes, that's correct. You should probably also be able to reproduce the
issue using whiptail.
Note that D-I uses cdebconf (C implementation) and not debconf (perl
i
Package: fribidi
Version: 0.19.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: d-i
We're seeing regressions in the newt frontend with the new version of the
fribidi udeb, as these screenshots show:
http://people.debian.org/~fjp/tmp/d-i/daily-borked2.png
http://people.debian.org/~fjp/tmp/d-i/daily-borked3.png
Note t
Package: w3m
Version: 0.5.2-2.1
Justification: Policy 7.2
Severity: serious
Given the package description for migemo installing it as a Recommends
and thus by default for all users of w3g is IMO not correct.
Recommends should only be used (see policy 7.2) for packages that are
"found together in a
Package: vlc-data
Version: 1.0.5-1
Severity: serious
I backported vlc myself for Lenny from unstable.
During the upgrade (from version 0.8.6.h-4+lenny2) I got the following
error:
Unpacking vlc-data (from .../vlc-data_1.0.5-1~bpo1_all.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/vlc-d
> screen on PC hangs, the splash screen and the boot prompt does not appear
> last line of the screen:
> Trying to load: pxelinux.cfg/default
We've had another report of the same issue where the problem was
identified. It's a known limitation of syslinux, which is documented in
the installatio
reassign 569719 linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6 1.49
severity 569719 important
thanks
On Saturday 13 February 2010, James Boughton wrote:
> Installation from the three CD's for the Feb 8, 2010 build of sparc
> testing seems to go without a hitch. The problem is that the system will
> not then boot from
merge 569763 569761
severity 569763 normal
tags 569763 moreinfo
thanks
On Sunday 14 February 2010, Patrick Naylor wrote:
> Comments/Problems:
> The network modem is detected. The DHCP configuration failed.
> I cannot continue with the installing process.
> Being loaded at the same hw the lenny 5.0
On Sunday 14 February 2010, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> 1. dh-di needed for build of partman-base is not pulled in as a
> result of 'apt-get build-dep debian-installer', probably should be?
No: base-installer is a separate source package and thus has its own build
deps. I just forgot to include a step
On Tuesday 09 February 2010, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 10:04:05PM +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> > My main concern is whether it affects installer in any adverse way, so
> > if you could arrange for an installer image to be built with the
> > modified parted, we could do som
reassign 568639 grub-pc 1.98~20100115-1
severity 568639 important
thanks
On Saturday 06 February 2010, Miroslav Rudisin wrote:
> At the end of installation of debian testing from netboot.tar.gz (build
> 20100122) the windows xp partition was correctly detected, because the
> dialog "if you see all
reassign 568529 grub-installer 1.49
severity 568529 serious
thanks
On Friday 05 February 2010, Piotr Lewandowski wrote:
> I'm aware that device enumeration issues were reported in #517563 and
> #516280 and are present in errata for lenny release RC2, but I believe
> that installer should not overw
On Friday 05 February 2010, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 07:52:23PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > I've traced this to Colin's commit that adds the "passthrough"
> > > frontend (r59807). If I revert that the text frontend works fine
> > > again.
>
> Fixed in r62177. I've asked O
On Thursday 04 February 2010, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
> > And it does not go away if I recompile cdebconf (tried for amd64).
^^^<<<<<--
> This is similar to what happened in powerpc to me. I have no
On Thursday 04 February 2010, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Marko Jung reported that d-i segfaults when you use
> DEBIAN_FRONTEND=text. I can reproduce this.
I've traced this to Colin's commit that adds the "passthrough" frontend
(r59807). If I revert that the text frontend works fine again.
It may
On Thursday 04 February 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
> But I can confirm as I'm also seeing a segfault during an installation
> on s390. During mirror selection (but not 100% reliably).
> And can also confirm for amd64 in Virtualbox, also during mirror
> selection.
And it does
Package: dosfstools
Version: 3.0.8-1
Severity: serious
Tags: d-i
Justification: Breaks Debian Installer
With the new version we're getting the following errors during builds
of images for D-I.
On i386:
mcopy -i./tmp/hd-media/boot.img ./tmp/hd-media/vmlinuz ::linux
Cannot initialize '::'
On ia64:
Just happened to be looking at the BTS...
Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> You might want to have a look at all these gcc warnings about
> array accesses being below/above array bounds, though. There
> may be more security issues hiding.
These warnings have been fixed in the upcoming upstream release.
C
On Tuesday 19 January 2010, dann frazier wrote:
> This fixes the issue for me, can you verify?
>
> zelenka.debian.org:~dannf/linux-image-2.6.18-6-s390_2.6.18.dfsg.1-27~562
>525.testfix.1_s390.deb
Works for me too. Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
wi
found 564489 0.4.8+git0.761c66f-6
thanks
Reopening as the patch was applied incorrectly.
The --udeb option should be added to dh_makeshlibs, not to dh_shlibdeps!
P.S. Note that you also have build failures on mips and mipsel.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.o
Package: localization-config-udeb
Version: 1.06
Severity: serious
A dependency on debconf was added, but debconf is not a valid udeb.
This incorrect dependency was added for some reason in today's upload.
If a dependency on debconf is needed (Lintian warning?), then please add
${misc:Depends} i
tags 564489 patch
thanks
The correct fix for this is to tell the build tools to look in
multipath-udeb for libraries when building the udeb (instead of looking in
multipath-tools). The resulting self-dependency is automatically filtered
out.
Needed change in debian/rules:
dh_installman
Package: multipath-udeb
Version: 0.4.8+git0.761c66f-5
Severity: serious
Tags: d-i
multipath-udeb currently has a dependency on "multipath-tools". This is
incorrect as no such udeb exists.
Please fix the packaging so this dependency is no longer generated.
If help with that is needed, please try
On Sunday 03 January 2010, dann frazier wrote:
> Thanks. This suggests that the fixes for CVE-2009-0029 are causal. To
> verify, can you test this kernel which drops only those fixes?
>
> zelenka.debian.org:~dannf/linux-headers-2.6.18-6-s390_2.6.18.dfsg.1-26et
>ch1+nocve20090029_s390.deb
s/header
On Saturday 02 January 2010, you wrote:
> Can you try:
> zelenka.debian.org:~dannf/linux-image-2.6.18-6-s390_2.6.18.dfsg.1-26etch
>1+div64_s390.deb
Linux version 2.6.18-6-s390 (Debian 2.6.18.dfsg.1-26etch1+div64)
[...]
Failed to execute /init
Kernel panic - not syncing: No init found. Try passing
On Saturday 02 January 2010, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > I've build tested the attached patch on a porter box and to me the
> > result looks good.
>
> I can build it on my powerbook but testing it (short of installing it on
I have considered doing an NMU, but was scared off by the huge amount of
c
On Tuesday 29 December 2009, dann frazier wrote:
> I don't see an obvious cause for the failure. Can you try booting
> 24etch1 in an effort to bisect the failure? In case you can't find the
> deb (I couldn't) I've built one that you can find in my home directory
> on zelenka.debian.org.
Linux vers
On Sunday 27 December 2009, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 01:39:28PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> > From that perspective apt should be tagged Build-Essential. Simply
> > because without apt you don't have a working build system.
>
> apt is not and never was
Torsten Werner wrote:
> The Build-Essential: yes field has been updated 2 months ago to better
> match the declared Depends in the package build-essential as requested
> in bug #548801.
It seems there is a misunderstanding about the purpose of the
Build-Essential flag then.
Obviously it is not t
On Friday 25 December 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> I'm seeing the same issue in an amd64/sid pbuilder environment when
> mandb gets installed as one of the build dependencies of
> cdebconf-entropy.
To show the severity of the issue, this is from my sparc box during a
regular upgrade (
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: serious
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-26etch1
Tags: d-i
X-Debbugs-CC: da...@debian-org
While testing the update for oldstable of debian-installer on my Hercules
s390 emulator, I found that the new kernel fails to boot.
It fails to execute init after loading the initramfs.
T
On Thursday 24 December 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> So the error is probably the result of anna trying to install the same
> package twice.
The exit code of anna was 8, which matches an error during unpack or
configure.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
Package: anna
Severity: serious
Yesterday I uploaded some packages, including base-installer and hw-detect.
Today during a test install from a local build this resulted in:
Failed to load installer component
loading base-installer failed for unknown reasons. Aborting.
tag 552497 - pending
thanks
On Thursday 24 December 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> There are however two issues.
> 1) The custom script never gets included in initrds as hw-detect gets
> unpacked first and thus the original udev version of the script
> overwrites the modified hw-detect
tag 552497 - pending
thanks
There is a difference between the scripts. The hw-detect version writes
some info to a file needed to support firmware loading.
There are however two issues.
1) The custom script never gets included in initrds as hw-detect gets
unpacked first and thus the original ud
Package: mac-fdisk
Version: 0.1-15
Severity: serious
Tags: patch d-i
The udebs do not get a correct dependency on libc6-udeb, but instead
depend on the regular libc6 package. We've ignored this for previous
releases, but for Squeeze it's RC because of britney support for udebs.
I originally tho
tag 562014 pending
thanks
On Tuesday 22 December 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> The udeb does not get a correct dependency on libc6-udeb, but instead
> depends on the regular libc6 package.
Given that the last maintainer upload for dmidecode was very long ago, I've
uploaded an NMU t
Package: dmidecode
Version: 2.9-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch d-i
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-b...@lists.debian.org
The udeb does not get a correct dependency on libc6-udeb, but instead
depends on the regular libc6 package.
The basic reason is that the control file does not set the correct package
Package: beep
Version: 1.2.2-23
Severity: serious
Tags: patch d-i
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-b...@lists.debian.org
The udeb does not get a correct dependency on libc6-udeb, but instead
depends on the regular libc6 package.
Personally I would recommend a switch to debhelper for the packaging as
it's b
On Friday 18 December 2009, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Both of these requests are completely reasonable, but conflict, so I
> think probably what I'll do is go for option b, and have deluser fail
> if --backup-to is set but --backup isn't. Given that we ship a default
> of '.', that should at least be
--- Forwarded message (begin)
From: Carlos O'Donell
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:39:17 +0100
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Stephen Leake wrote:
> Frans Pop gave me access to his machine. I have some more information
> on the bug.
>
> If I compile from full GNADE
--- Forwarded message (begin)
From: Stephen Leake
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:03:24 +0100
Frans Pop gave me access to his machine. I have some more information
on the bug.
If I compile from full GNADE source (not using the GNADE dynamic or
static libraries), the code works.
With the
Package: libslang2
Version: 2.2.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: d-i
Justification: Breaks Debian Installer image builds
Since the update of libslang2 earlier today building Debian Installer images
on amd64 fails during library reduction (mklibs) with:
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib//libslang.a(sldisply.o): re
ility to 5.
+
+ -- Frans Pop Wed, 02 Dec 2009 02:00:15 +0100
+
sysconfig (0.0.9) unstable; urgency=low
* Don't use the deprecated PHYSDEVPATH interface.
diff -Nru sysconfig-0.0.9/debian/compat sysconfig-0.0.9+nmu1/debian/compat
--- sysconfig-0.0.9/debian/compat 2008-07-04 12:49:34.
reassign 538086 user-setup 1.23
retitle 538086 user-setup: Lenny version is incompatible with Squeeze/Sid
tags 538086 lenny wontfix
thanks
On Wednesday 18 November 2009, Yaroslav Rozhylo wrote:
> Steps to reproduce:
> 1. Boot from CD debian-503-i386-businesscard.iso
> 2. Advanced Installation - KD
On Tuesday 27 October 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> The live-installer source package not only has a udeb, but also a deb.
> This means that it must also have a Standards-Version field in
> debian/control. Only source packages that have *only* udebs are allowed
> to omit that field.
When t
Package: live-installer
Version: 13
Severity: serious
The live-installer source package not only has a udeb, but also a deb. This
means that it must also have a Standards-Version field in debian/control.
Only source packages that have *only* udebs are allowed to omit that field.
--
To UNSUBSC
Package: hw-detect
Version: 1.73
Severity: serious
During a D-I build on armel I noticed the following:
Unpacking udev-udeb (from udebs/udev-udeb.udeb) ...
dpkg: warning: overriding problem because --force enabled:
trying to overwrite '/lib/udev/firmware.agent', which is also in package
hw-dete
Package: locales
Version: 2.10.1-2
Severity: serious
During a regular upgrade from version 2.9.-25 I got the following error:
Generating locales (this might take a while)...
en_US.UTF-8...cannot map archive header: Invalid argument
done
Generation complete.
I read #524483, but this looks to b
reassign 546834 util-linux 2.16-3
severity 546834 serious
affects 546834 debootstrap
tags 546834 d-i
thanks
On Wednesday 16 September 2009, Tak Auyeung wrote:
> lh_build failed and stopped in debootstrap phase. lh_build is set up to
> use "sid" for both bootstrap and chroot. Attached please find a
On Wednesday 09 September 2009, Nis Martensen wrote:
> After installing the latest stable updates, qcontrol stopped working:
> qcontrol error: gpio_keys device not available
A fixed version of the packages is now also available from the
proposed-updates distribution, or it can be downloaded direc
tags 545801 pending
thanks
On Thursday 10 September 2009, Nis Martensen wrote:
> 2009/9/9 Frans Pop :
> > Can you please provide the output of the following command (as root):
> > udevadm test /class/input/event0
>
> [output of command snipped]
Thanks Nis, that confir
reassign 545226 ftp.debian.org
forcemerge 544478 545226
thanks
On Saturday 05 September 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
> reassign 545226 grub-installer
This has nothing to do with grub-installer. The issue has been reported
and analyzed before. See #544478.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
reassign 545018 libsepol1 2.0.37-1
retitle 545018 libsepol1: causes debootstrap to fail
severity 545018 serious
thanks
This is unlikely to be a bug in debootstrap itself, but more likely to be
temporary breakage in the testing distribution.
I can reproduce the error and the installation fails at:
Package: grub-legacy
Version: 0.97-56
Severity: serious
Tags: d-i
List-CC: diffut...@packages.debian.org
During a new installation using D-I of testing today I got:
/usr/sbin/grub-install: 400: cmp: not found
cmp is from the recently renamed diffutils, which is no longer required
and essentia
reassign 544400 debian-installer
forcemerge 536375 544400
thanks
> This is my first install of debian on s390. I downloaded your images,
> booted and got a kernel panic. This looks like problem # 536354.
Correct. The kernel is now fixed, but the installer still needs to be
updated, which will h
Package: directfb
Version: 1.4.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: d-i
As already announced in my reply to the call to test the 1.4 version in
experimental, this version introduces a few of important regression in
Debian Installer.
I've built cairo, gtk+2.0 and cdebconf (all from unstable) against it f
Package: eglibc
Version: 2.9-24
Severity: serious
Tags: d-i
Justification: Breaks Debian Installer
In the latest upload the udebs for all architectures are empty.
This breaks installations at the partitioning stage and later
as symbols cannot be found:
md-devices: mdadm: relocation error: mdadm: s
It looks like busybox also causes a failure on i386.
If I boot a daily mini.iso, the boot hangs when executing the last line
from /sbin/init:
exec /usr/sbin/chroot . /bin/busybox init /dev/console 2>&1
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsu
reassign 541112 ftp.debian.org
forcemerge 536312 541112
thanks
On Tuesday 11 August 2009, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> I've used the 5.0.2 KDE i386 install image
> (debian-cd/5.0.2/i386/iso-cd/debian-502-i386-kde-CD-1.iso)
>
> After a reboot, kdm started and asked for a login/pass. I could
> log in, but
Package: busybox
Severity: serious
Version: 1:1.14.2-1
Tags: d-i
On s390 the installer fails to boot with:
can't open /dev/tty2: No such file or directory
can't open /dev/tty3: No such file or directory
can't open /dev/tty4: No such file or directory
I'm not sure how busybox can be responsible fo
severity 540023 wishlist
reassign 540023 debian-installer
thanks
On Wednesday 05 August 2009, Patrick Vervoorn wrote:
> Digging deeper, finally the output shown in the output from the
> underlying installation scripts (Alt-F4), showed what had happened: the
> PGP-keyring was out of date, and the b
On Tuesday 04 August 2009, you wrote:
> Frans Pop wrote:
> > This oneliner change would fix the issue as well:
> > +++ b/packages/base-installer/debian/bootstrap-base.postinst
> > @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ install_base_system () {
> > # so make a
reassign 539744 base-installer
tags 539744 pending
thanks
On Tuesday 04 August 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> One, IMO fairly logical, solution to this could be to not let partman
> create /etc/fstab *in* /target, but instead create it somewhere in the
> the D-I environment and then l
On Tuesday 04 August 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> And yes, replacing the UUIDs in the fstab by regular devices gets rid
> of the segfault. Still weird that an empty mtab avoids it though.
>
> Colin, any thoughts (given that you implemented the switch to UUID)?
The problem is essentially
severity 539586 normal
retitle 539586 [s390] partman-base: fails ugly when ext4 is selected
thanks
On Sunday 02 August 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> I just tried an install on s390 and after I chose ext4 as partition I
> got a dialog containing only "? / ?" (or something clos
Package: partman-base
Version: 129
Severity: serious
I just tried an install on s390 and after I chose ext4 as partition I got
a dialog containing only "? / ?" (or something close to that).
I also got the following in the syslog:
main-menu[622]: INFO: Menu item 'partman-base' selected
ann
On Friday 31 July 2009, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Wasn't the plan to do this differently in noninteractive installs,
> precisely because dash should become the default /bin/sh on build
> systems?
Well, how would you distinguish between a build system and a regular
system at some user that for whatever
Package: dash
Version: 0.5.5.1-2.3
Severity: serious
During the upgrade of a pbuilder environment I noticed that if
DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive, and possibly also if debconf is
not available at all, dash - when not previously installed - can
not ask its question and will thus become the default
On Tuesday 21 July 2009, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Frans Pop [2009-07-21 16:23]:
> > What *exactly* do you mean by "/ is no longer mounted"? It seems to
> > me that it is kind of a silly statement because without a / I would
> > say you can't have a chroot.
&
On Tuesday 21 July 2009, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Martin Michlmayr [2009-07-02 22:39]:
> > I just tried a daily image on ARM and it failed because the ramdisk
> > cannot be generated. Apparently this is because / is not mounted in
> > the chroot.
>
> I don't know why root is no longer mounted
On Friday 10 July 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> Here's an (untested) patch that should avoid this issue for the future.
> It determines the codename for testing from the testing symlink.
As the script is maybe not under version control, attached the full new
version.
mk-extra-o
Here's an (untested) patch that should avoid this issue for the future.
It determines the codename for testing from the testing symlink.
A manual cleanup for the current incorrect override files (for both lenny
and squeeze) will still be needed of course.
Cheers,
FJP
--- mk-extra-overrides.sh.o
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20090123lenny3
Severity: serious
Installs of Lenny for s390 fail because of a kernel problem. See
http://lists.debian.org/debian-s390/2009/07/msg2.html for details.
A bug against the kernel has already been reported (#536354).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20070308etch5
Severity: serious
Installs of Etch for s390 fail because the Release signature cannot be
verified. From the syslog:
Jul 9 09:33:42 main-menu[656]: INFO: Menu item 'choose-mirror' selected
Jul 9 09:33:47 choose-mirror[808]: DEBUG: command: wget -
On Thursday 09 July 2009, Joey Hess wrote:
> Ftpmasters: Task override updating is handled by an autobyhand script
> fjp wrote, /srv/ftp.debian.org/dak/scripts/debian/byhand-task. I don't
> have access to look at what's on ftpmaster,
AFAIK everything can also be found on merkel though.
> but look
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> To fix it, you have to:
> 1/ document in the file that it's auto-updated based on the debconf
> infos and that dpkg-reconfigure console-setup is recommended to update
> it 2/ use ucf or something similar to detect if the file has been
> edited by t
On Sunday 17 May 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> Basically: you very simply cannot use images built for Lenny to install
> Squeeze.
>
> At least not netboot images. I guess that if you took a Lenny
> businesscard CD and selected expert mode, it would happily install
> Squeeze if you a
On Sunday 17 May 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 17 May 2009, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > This is why it only appears with images generated with glibc 2.7 (ie
> > lenny images), and not with the daily ones which use glibc 2.9.
>
> This type pf problem is well known and wil
On Sunday 17 May 2009, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> This is why it only appears with images generated with glibc 2.7 (ie
> lenny images), and not with the daily ones which use glibc 2.9.
This type pf problem is well known and will not get fixed until the first
Beta release of D-I. It is also virtually
On Sunday 17 May 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> There may be a problem with weekly built CD images too. In this period
> (after a Debian release and before the first Beta, when udeb migrations
> are allowed without worrying about breaking D-I images in testing) they
> really should be bui
reassign 528443 powerpc-utils 1.1.3-22
severity 528443 important
thanks
On Wednesday 13 May 2009, Rick Thomas wrote:
> Everything progressed normally until during the installation of the
> base packages, it failed. According to the syslog file there was a
> problem setting up the powerpc-utils pa
-- Forwarded Message --
From: David Miller
The reason this bug happens is because CONFIG_PROM_CONSOLE is enabled
in the kernel.
It unconditionally gets registered as a real console before the Sun
Hypervisor console driver has a chance to register. The kernel takes
whatever rea
On Thursday 23 April 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> This is almost certainly a result of the cdebconf changes committed by
> Nicolas François (CCed).
Although the new version of newt uploaded a few days ago could also be a
factor (and possibly even the slightly older slang2 update).
On Wednesday 08 April 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> Maybe the following will provide some info:
>
> # udevadm test /sys/bus/ccw/devices/0.0.0121
> [...]
> udev_device_new_from_syspath: device 0x42b828 has devpath
> '/devices/css0/0.0.0005/0.0.0121'
> wait_for_file: f
Maybe the following will provide some info:
# udevadm test /sys/bus/ccw/devices/0.0.0121
[...]
udev_device_new_from_syspath: device 0x42b828 has devpath
'/devices/css0/0.0.0005/0.0.0121'
wait_for_file: file '/sys/devices/css0/0.0.0005/0.0.0121/online' appeared after
0 loops
udev_rules_apply_to_e
Package: udev
Version: 0.140-2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
User: debian-s...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: s390
After upgrading udev the system fails to boot correctly as my second
disk (dasdb) and network interface (ctc0) are no longer brought up.
The initrd loads cor
On Friday 20 March 2009, Jon Masters wrote:
> > Sure, if there are very strong reasons to break things, fine. But
> > whenever possible the kernel has ensured backwards compatibility,
> > mostly only _after_ someone "complained". Think of the i386 and
> > x86_64 symlinks after the x86 integration,
1 - 100 of 562 matches
Mail list logo
