Bug#668457: monotone: FTBFS (multiple test suite failures)

2012-04-20 Thread Francis Russell
I've just had a go at building monotone in an i386 unstable chroot and had no issues. Perhaps whatever was causing the build failure is now fixed? Francis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debi

Bug#668457: [Monotone-debian] Bug#668457: monotone: FTBFS (multiple test suite failures)

2012-04-13 Thread Francis Russell
I had no issues rebuilding this on my 'testing' install, so I guess whatever's causing the issue hasn't hit it yet. Looking at the logs, it looks the the fails occur because monotone is failing to find its test databases, but the copy that creates them appears to complete successfully. Someone

Bug#665448: [Monotone-debian] Bug#665448: Bug#665448: monotone: FTBFS: testsuite failure

2012-03-25 Thread Francis Russell
On 25/03/12 20:40, Thomas Moschny wrote: > Hi, > > this is a mini-patch I recently added to the Fedora package, to build > against newer PCRE. It deletes '(?<=\C)' from the list of regular > expressions in .mtn-ignore expected to throw an error. I wish you'd sent that a few hours earlier :) > Th

Bug#665448: monotone: FTBFS: testsuite failure

2012-03-25 Thread Francis Russell
On 24/03/12 18:28, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > Please find the time to investigate and correct this problem. I suspect > something to do with libpcre3. I'll sponsor an upload as soon as you > can fix the problem. If you need help, scream. > I've pushed a fixed version, see the patch for details.

Bug#623734: [Monotone-debian] Bug#623734: Bug#623734: monotone: FTBFS: test suite timeout

2011-04-25 Thread Francis Russell
Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > At any rate, the Linux logs reveal that the (presumed) hang in question > occurs early on, perhaps as a result of attempting to make check in > parallel: Thank you! I attempted to build with a parallelism of 4, and make started consuming 100% CPU. We'll start working with t

Bug#623734: [Monotone-debian] Bug#623734: monotone: FTBFS: test suite timeout

2011-04-24 Thread Francis Russell
Dear Aaron, this appears to be a hang, since the monotone test suite produces extensive output. Multiple monotone maintainers, developers and others have tried to replicate the hang and failed. At the very least, I believe the following configurations have been tested and found not to manifest the

Bug#601850: monotone: Empty command string can be used to crash certain server configurations

2010-10-30 Thread Francis Russell
Package: monotone Version: 0.48-2 Severity: serious Tags: upstream Monotone versions 0.46, 0.47 and 0.48 are affected by a bug whereby a client sending an empty command string to the server can cause it to terminate if remote command execution is enabled. This has been fixed in 0.48.1. Further d

Bug#591112: [Monotone-debian] Bug#591112: monotone: FTBFS: test failed

2010-07-31 Thread Francis Russell
> This is a weird failure. The test in question marks a directory > unwritable via "chmod a-w" and then tries to perform a database > migration which needs write access to the database. The migration is > expected to fail because the database journal should not be writable to > the directory, but f

Bug#559893: Bug#574512: Release-critical bugs in monotone: ping?

2010-06-01 Thread Francis Russell
Ludovic Brenta wrote: Is anyone still interested in maintaining monotone in Debian? Just thought I'd add that I use monotone from Debian and know others who do as well. I'm willing to help in whatever way I can although I'm not a Debian Maintainer. Is this just a manpower issue? Francis

Bug#574512: Info received ([Monotone-debian] Bug#574512: monotone: mtn sync fails with 'fatal' error message)

2010-03-30 Thread Francis Russell
Any progress on this bug? I assume it's not Debian-specific? Many thanks, Francis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#574512: [Monotone-debian] Bug#574512: monotone: mtn sync fails with 'fatal' error message

2010-03-18 Thread Francis Russell
Thomas Keller wrote: > This looks like a regression introduced in f65d9cb5 - please check if > this patch solves your problem: I rebuilt with the suggested patch and this appeared to fix the problem. Francis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject o

Bug#516394: djbdns: Thoughts on the dnscache cache poisoning issue

2010-01-13 Thread Francis Russell
Package: djbdns Severity: normal Hi there, please do forgive me if I've got the wrong end of the stick here or the code I've posted is completely wrong or makes no sense. It would be nice to get djbdns back into testing. As I understand it, this bug works by getting dnscache to send extensive nu

Bug#536693: mayavi segfault with tk8.5

2009-09-14 Thread Francis Russell
The problem still appears to exist in Debian testing. However, installing the latest python-vtk package from unstable (which also pulls in libvtk5.2) appears to fix it. Francis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Bug#536693: mayavi segfault with tk8.5

2009-07-12 Thread Francis Russell
Package: mayavi Version: 1.5-5 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Mayavi segfaults instantly on startup in Debian testing. This appears to caused by upgrading python-tk from version 2.5.2-1 to 2.5.2-1.1 which switches python from using tk8.4 to tk8.5. -- System Information: