severity 619936 important
thanks
This might hinder me in getting the resulting bugfix
into a point release, but anyway:
The package is usable in most installations, so
the definition of severity "important" is
eminently suited.
Regards
Florian
--
Floria
ing time and sorry for not debugging in the first place
> myself.
You are welcome - and no problem at all. Thank you for
debugging it now.
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: m...@fhinzmann.de
Debian: f.
Hello!
Please allow another question before I return to this issue
later: Which shell do you use when this problem occurs?
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmannprivate: m...@fhinzmann.de
Debian: f...@debian.org
PGP Key / ID: 1024D
;which dig" and "dig -v" say?
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmannprivate: m...@fhinzmann.de
Debian: f...@debian.org
PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65
Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F DF1C DF79 A374 B407 1A65
--
To UNSUBSC
again.
--
Florian Hinzmann private: f.hinzm...@hamburg.de
Debian: f...@debian.org
PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65
Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F DF1C DF79 A374 B407 1A65
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-r
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:13:01 +0100
Florian Hinzmann wrote:
> Do we have a policy or best practice on what to do about tests in
> general and online tests in particular with respect to build daemons?
Kind of P.S.:
I assumed the build daemons would both
- have online access and
- use noch
he whole test suite disabled
within debian/rules before as to go easy on our build daemons.
Now with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck I did enable them, but
skip if nocheck was given.
Do we have a policy or best practice on what to do about tests in
general and online tests in particular with resp
tags 488829 +pending
thanks
Hello!
Thanks for your report and making a patch. I applied
it to my working copy and will upload it soon.
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian: [EMAIL
no rescuer appears in time to do an last upload
before the general freeze at latest.
Opinions anyone? Steve?
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A
e.
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65
Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F DF1C DF79 A374 B407 1A65
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
Hello!
Upstream is preparing an update. I will use that solution or coordinate
enhancements if need arises. It should be a matter of days.
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian: [EMAIL
Hello!
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:15:24 +0100
Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> what about this patch?
I am not sure yet. I will investigate more deeply within the
next days. I did contact the author of Net::DNS already.
Regards
Florian
--
Flor
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 10:19:47 -0300
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's a relief, it means xfmail in the NMU should be working fine...
Yes, it does work fine. I've installed and testet it.
Thanks.
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann
does not include libsaslX?
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65
Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F DF1C DF79 A374 B407 1A65
14 matches
Mail list logo
