Bug#625962: [sparse] FTBFS in sid pbuilder

2011-05-07 Thread Emil Langrock
.dfsg-2+b1 Package's Recommends field is empty. Package's Suggests field is empty. -- Emil Langrock -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#605462: [openjdk-6] FTBFS on amd64 cowbuilder for experimental

2010-11-30 Thread Emil Langrock
org 500 stable ftp.debian.org 1 experimentalwww.debian-multimedia.org 1 experimentalftp.debian.org --- Package information. --- Package's Depends field is empty. Package's Recommends field is empty. Package's Suggests field is empty. -- Em

Bug#599511: [chromium-browser] FTBFS: converting to non-pointer type 'unsigned int' from NULL

2010-10-20 Thread Emil Langrock
Emil Langrock wrote: > Package: chromium-browser > Version: 7.0.544.0~r61416-1 > Severity: serious > > Build in a cowbuilder with up-to-date unstable+experimental amd64 in. > sources.list > > CXX(target) out/Release/obj.target/glue/webkit/glue/webvideoframe_impl.o &

Bug#599511: [chromium-browser] FTBFS: converting to non-pointer type 'unsigned int' from NULL

2010-10-08 Thread Emil Langrock
(>= 1:1.2.0) | 1:1.2.5.dfsg-1 xdg-utils | 1.0.2+cvs20100307-2 chromium-browser-inspector| 6.0.472.62~r59676-1 Package's Recommends field is empty. Suggests (Version) | Installed

Bug#593933: [Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#593933: kmymoney: Please build with AqBanking 5

2010-09-23 Thread Emil Langrock
Emil Langrock wrote: severity 593933 whishlist block 593933 by 597565 thanks So, now (after #594553) it is clear that the assumption in the first post of this bug (#593933) were wrong and only pkg-config was missing. So back to whishlist for aqbanking 5 support - which the next release of

Bug#593933: kmymoney: Please build with AqBanking 5

2010-09-20 Thread Emil Langrock
Emil Langrock wrote: > I see it the same way, but I would say that this is a kind of FTBFS and > thus it must have the severity serious. > > This has no effect on the squeeze release as it is part of experimental I've added my complete patch to get the package build again with a

Bug#586736: [dash] Cannot start system wide scripts

2010-09-02 Thread Emil Langrock
Emil Langrock wrote: > wrote: > > Package: dash > > Version: 0.5.6.1-1~exp0 > > Severity: serious > > > > I noticed that my system nearly fails to do everything after installing > > dash from experimental. The first thing I noticed was > > > >

Bug#586736: [dash] Cannot start system wide scripts

2010-09-02 Thread Emil Langrock
n introduced by 0006--INPUT-exit-127-if-command_file-is-given-but-doesn-t.diff It is absolute bogus - everybody can see it from two miles away. Please remove it. -- Emil Langrock -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#595228: [dash] Cannot start system wide scripts

2010-09-02 Thread Emil Langrock
unstableftp.debian.org 500 testing ftp.debian.org 500 stable ftp.debian.org 1 experimentalftp.debian.org --- Package information. --- Depends (Version) | Installed ===-+-==== debianutils (>= 2.15) | 3.4 dpkg