moothly.
Thanks for your support !
--
Read the Jazz Blog !! http://jazzblog.didierverna.com
Didier Verna, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.lrde.epita.fr/~didier
EPITA / LRDE, 14-16 rue Voltaire Tel.+33 (1) 44 08 01 85
94276 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France Fax.+33 (1) 53 14 59 22 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ption available)
pn tetex-extra(no description available)
-- debconf information:
tex-common/check_texmf_wrong:
tex-common/check_texmf_missing:
tex-common/singleuser: false
--
Read the Jazz Blog !! http://jazzblog.didierverna.com
Didier Verna, [EMAIL P
for it.
--
Looking for a Christmas present idea? http://cdbaby.com/cd/didierverna
Didier VernaEPITA / LRDE, 14-16 rue Voltaire Tel.+33 (1) 44 08 01 85
94276 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France Fax.+33 (1) 53 14 59 22
t's going on under my feet in this
area...
--
Check out my new jazz CD on http://www.didierverna.com/ !
Didier VernaEPITA / LRDE, 14-16 rue Voltaire Tel.+33 (1) 44 08 01 85
94276 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France Fax.+33 (1) 53 14 59 22
debugging what's wrong with the other would be appreciated...
Thanks for the idea !
--
Check out my new jazz CD on http://www.didierverna.com/ !
Didier VernaEPITA / LRDE, 14-16 rue Voltaire Tel.+33 (1) 44 08 01 85
94276 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France Fax.+33 (1) 53 14 59 22
22.3-1 Utilities that use the proc filesy
ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-13 compression library - runtime
iceweasel recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
Check out my new jazz CD on http://www.didierverna.com/ !
Didier VernaEPITA / LRDE, 14-16 rue
Package: hplip
Severity: grave
Hi !
The hplip package 0.9.9-2 makes my printer unusable, complaining with the
following message:
% tail -f /var/log/syslog
Apr 3 11:44:04 localhost hpiod: invalid model DeskJet_845C !=
DESKJET_845C Device::Open io/hpiod/device.cpp 919 Apr 3 11:44:04
loc
have been
> + added to the group you chose - this has to be done manually by you!
> + .
Yup. That would make things pretty clear (the typo in useRs excepted ;-)
--
Didier Verna, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.lrde.epita.fr/~didier
EPITA / LRDE, 14-16 rue Voltaire Tel.+33 (1) 44 08 01 8
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Or/and a debconf question of higher priority?
Sure ! That's the way to go !
--
Didier Verna, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.lrde.epita.fr/~didier
EPITA / LRDE, 14-16 rue Voltaire Tel.+33 (1) 44 08 01 85
94276 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre
utomatically, or, like I
said in the other message, people should be warned _big time_ that they're
gonna have to do it by hand.
But still, I'm not opposed to this change ;-)
--
Didier Verna, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.lrde.epita.fr/~didier
EPITA / LRDE, 14-16 rue Voltaire Tel.+33 (1) 44 08 01 85
94276 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France Fax.+33 (1) 53 14 59 22 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
x27;t you want your TeX users to be members of the 'users'
> group ?
Where did you see I was against this ??
--
Didier Verna, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.lrde.epita.fr/~didier
EPITA / LRDE, 14-16 rue Voltaire Tel.+33 (1) 44 08 01 85
94276 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France Fax.+33 (1) 53 14 59 22 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> installations and leave unstable users to chmod -R.
I'm not opposed to that change. However, I still consider it a bug to
suddenly break working installations without further notice. And no,
README.Debian is not enough. There should be at least a big blinking red light
somewhere (prob
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 3.0-14
Severity: grave
Hi !
I just discovered that mktexmf can't write to /var/cache/fonts (and below)
anymore, making it impossible for any user to process LaTeX files requiring
the generation of new font descriptions.
An excerpt from the compilation log is
Package: compface
Version: 1:1.5.2-2
Severity: grave
Hi !
Now that compface doesn't generate spurious warnings anymore, it doesn't
encode faces properly anymore either :-( Or maybe it's uncompface that doesn't
do the right job, I don't know.
Here's a test case (files attached below):
c
Package: compface
Version: 1:1.5.2-1
Severity: grave
Hi,
since the last upgrade, compface doesn't do its job anymore, but generates
unjustified warnings instead. Here is a testcase on the xbm file attached
below (that looks ok to me):
compface test.xbm Err 1 1
Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Expect a 2.4 sbcl, without threading, in my people.debian.org repositry
> soon.
Thanks. BTW, I'm surprised that precompiled 2.4 kernels don't support
multi-threading ?
--
Didier Verna, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www
Package: sbcl
Version: 1:0.9.4.65-1
Severity: grave
Hi !
When I try to launch SBCL, I get the following message:
,
| fatal error encountered in SBCL pid 10204(tid 16384):
| This version of sbcl is compiled with threading support, but your kernel is
| too old to support this. Please
17 matches
Mail list logo