Package: emacsen-common
Version: 2.0.2
Severity: grave
emacs-snapshot/2:20120521-1 cannot be installed on my system.
Downgrading it to 2:20120510-1 also failed.
Downgrading emacsen-common to 1.4.23 fixed this issue.
The attachment is installation log.
Install apel for emacs-snapshot
install/ape
Deepak Tripathi writes:
> Hi Tested the m.d.n version , its working now. Also tested clfwwm and
> found that "Component" bug is still not fixed. I need to upgrade asdf.
>
> Can you make /debian/control file in such a way that it will take
> upgraded version.
>From stumpwm/1:20110819.gitca08e08-2
Deepak Tripathi writes:
> Desmond,
> Please find the information below.
>> What's the value of this:
>>
>> (asdf::flatten-source-registry)
>>
>
> * (asdf::flatten-source-registry)
>
> ((#P"/usr/lib/sbcl/" :RECURSE T :EXCLUDE
> (".bzr" ".cdv" ".git" ".hg" ".pc" ".svn" "CVS" "RCS" "SCCS" "_darc
Deepak Tripathi writes:
> Desmond,
>
> I don't think that this could be an issue, I have .sbclrc file with the
> following information.
>
> (require 'asdf)
>
> Now if you run sbcl and type (find-package :asdf) it will return you
> true.
What's the value of this:
(asdf::flatten-source-registry
Deepak Tripathi writes:
> Package: stumpwm
> Version: 1:20110819.gitca08e08-1
> Severity: grave
>
> Dear Maintainer,
> I have updated my system to gdm3/gnome3 and after upgrading stumpwm has
> not been functioning properly. At first glace i thought its a StumWm bug
> but later when i installed fr
Hi,
Simon Chopin writes:
> Package: clfswm
> Version: 20111015.git51b0a02-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Hi,
>
> When trying to start clfswm, I just get this error message and then the
> program exits :
>
> *** - Component "clfswm" not found
>
It's a bug f
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 03:24, Agustin Martin wrote:
>
> Does this mean that this bug report really belongs to clisp?
I think so.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 00:42, Peter Van Eynde wrote:
> I'm all in favor of your work and I think that you are doing the right
> thing, but I'm missing the following:
>
> - documenting what lisp packages should do
> - documenting what lisp implementation should do
> - documenting how users can us
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 15:25, servilio wrote:
> On 1 March 2011 02:56, Desmond O. Chang wrote:
>> Hi servilio,
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 18:58, servilio wrote:
>>>
>>> This is a problem in the clisp package, CLX works in 2.48, but not in
>&g
Hi servilio,
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 18:58, servilio wrote:
>
> This is a problem in the clisp package, CLX works in 2.48, but not in
> 2.49 even with clisp-module-clx installed:
How do you start stumpwm? If you exec /usr/bin/stumpwm, it should
work. If you load stumpwm in repl, you have to (r
forcemerge 560781 560963
thanks
This bug should be closed since it's the same as #560781.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi gregor,
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 23:28, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 23:15:55 +0800, Desmond O. Chang wrote:
>
>> > What surprises me is that common-lisp-controller _does_ depend on
>> > adduser. Do we need a Pre-Depends here since adduser is used in
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 04:15, gregor herrmann wrote:
>
> What surprises me is that common-lisp-controller _does_ depend on
> adduser. Do we need a Pre-Depends here since adduser is used in the
> .preinst?
Or moving adduser to 'postinst configure'? Which one is right?
Thanks,
Des
--
To UNSU
Hi Serafeim,
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 05:28, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 10:31:29AM +0800, Desmond O. Chang wrote [edited]:
>> I have a question about the patch. If I remove (not purge) c-l-c
>> first, I will also encounter the confli
Hi Serafeim,
Is it a reasonable patch for the conffile conflict? I think it will
delete the file even if user has modified it.
I'm looking for the solution about that too. If you ensure your patch
is correct, would you please merge it into our git repo?
Thanks,
Des
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 06:3
15 matches
Mail list logo
