Hi,
This libffi upgrade also completely breaks all use of Wayland on
aarch64. We use libffi to dispatch protocol messages (requests
received by the server and events received by the client) to
native-code handlers, and we are now getting completely nonsensical
values from it.
Can this upgrade plea
Package: tracker-miner-evolution
Version: 0.14.0-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
Sorry, I feel like a bit of a tool reporting an RC bug as my first bug
in pretty much forever, but ... whenever I have tracker-miner-evolution
installed, evolution just plain refuses to s
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 08:24:07AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2011, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Hmm. Seems plausible, but I went through quite a few libX11 uploads
> > without losing my diversion: I would've noticed quite quickly, as the
> > failur
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:06:39PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2011-06-22 21:10 +0200, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 08:50:40PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> >> This is bad indeed. However, I am unable to reproduce this behavior.
> >> Could yo
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.16.0.3
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
I have pretty much the entirety of the X stack diverted through
dpkg-divert so I can keep package dependencies, but still run all my own
built-from-git X stuff. This includes all the client libraries.
Perh
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 07:55:35PM -0400, ext David Nusinow wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 01:53:40PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > As I've said before, the X server isn't the only user of the field. :)
> > Ubuntu were trying to move to cxkb a year or so ago, and the on
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 02:47:06PM +0200, ext Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 20:02:31 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > You were right, Julien. It was because of hal (specifically the file
> > /usr/share/hal/fdi/policy/10osvendor/10-x11-input.fdi) that the evdev
> > driver was enable
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 08:17:10PM -0400, ext David Nusinow wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 10:02:35PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 08:02:31PM +0200, ext Michael Biebl wrote:
> > > Whenever xorg input hotplugging kicks in, the evdev driver is used. The
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 08:02:31PM +0200, ext Michael Biebl wrote:
> Whenever xorg input hotplugging kicks in, the evdev driver is used. The
> kbd keyboard settings from xorg.conf are ignored and the en_US keyboard
> layout is used.
Yes, this should probably be fixed up, I guess. But the long-ter
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 01:23:52PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 03:50:04PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 02:01:59PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > > Hi, when I try to build libx11 under etch or sid I get the foll
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 02:01:59PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Package: libx11
> Version: 2:1.0.0-8
> Severity: serious
> Justification: no longer builds from source
>
> Hi, when I try to build libx11 under etch or sid I get the following error:
>
> make[3]: Leaving directory
> `/scratc
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 12:10:08PM +0200, David Schmitt wrote:
> The new debian/copyright only contains licensing information for
> src/XvMCWrapper.c. The other source files
>
> ./include/X11/extensions/XvMClib.h
> ./src/XvMClibint.h
> ./src/XvMC.c
>
> do not contain any licensing information an
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 09:53:34AM +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> True. But as the driver is distributed under the MIT licence, I don't
> think it has to be under the "preferred form for modification". Unless
> Debian requires it ?
Um, the subject is about a DFSG violation, not a licence violation.
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 01:21:26AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 02:12:17PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > The nv driver appears to be heavily obfuscated and is effectively
> > The idea that nvidia do not posess an electronic list of register names
> > and offset
Hi,
This copyright file looks fine ([EMAIL PROTECTED] is me, but I
don't use that address anymore). However, I should note that libxv1 was
packaged from scratch (being a part of the modular tree), so at least
the first paragraph should be removed. I don't think it's terribly
important information
I'd be stunned if this was actually a server problem, and not a
client-side problem related to grabs. Which window manager do you use?
Does changing it fix anything?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
I've committed this patch upstream (thanks). I'd suggest that ioport
just not be built for S390.
Cheers,
Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 03:56:00AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 8, 2006 at 21:42:11 +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > I'm raising the severity of this bug to critical because, although
> > xorg-server was never compiled in s390 before (thus bug was filed with
> > severity: important),
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 07:43:11PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Your package fails to build in unstable with the following errors.
> The changelog from xpdf (which had the same problem) will help you resolve
> this issue:
>
> xpdf (3.01-8) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * Add patch 05_freetype-2
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 08:11:09PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 04:17:02AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > > ..could it be a font thing? These crashes started after the font I
> > > had set up for Sylpheed-gtk1, disappeared off this box, everything
> > > else works like it
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 02:24:54PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 03:11:35PM +0200, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> > Package: xkeycaps
> > Version: 2.47-1
> > Severity: serious
>
> > From my pbuilder build log:
>
> > ...
> > debian/rules build
> > dh_testdir
> > imake -DUseInst
On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 10:32:25PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> With the modular split of Xorg 7, these files have probably scattered to
> different packages.
>
> Can someone suggest a good strategy for figuring out which packages currently
> contain the affected files? I don't want to down
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 09:00:50PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:08:21PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 09:08:35PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > > Right, I'm not really sure why Daniel removed the template in the ubuntu
&g
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 09:08:35PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 12:44:01AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 08:40:03AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > > Quoting Adam Borowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > > The debconf question xserver-xorg/config/i
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 11:48:07AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> As to the actual failure, it doesn't look as if it should be related to
> the NMU patch, and this is some other strange thing. On i386, it fails
> with
>
> i486-linux-gnu-gcc -c -DUSE_LUCID -Demacs -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DUSE_LUCID -I.
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 09:47:28AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 26 avril 2006 à 00:22 +0100, Sam Morris a écrit :
> > When I try to log in to Gnome, the X server segfaults (leaving my
> > console in a very bad state, I have to shell in from another machine
> > to fix it).
> >
> > A
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 10:52:41AM +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
> mgapdesk fails to build because it can't find xf86Parser.h. It used to
> be in xlibs-static-dev, but doesn't seem to be in any of the Xorg 7.0
> packages.
>
> [...]
> > make[3]: Entering directory
> > `/home/mvela/deb/mgapdesk/mgapdes
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 08:55:16AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> AC_PATH_X searches[1] for [Xt],[X11/Intrinsic.h],[XtMalloc (0)] by
> default, so this shouldn't have worked[2], as you do not build-depend on
> libxt-dev. Try purging libxt-dev and rebuild after
> dpkg-source -x.
Er, no, that's AC_
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 04:05:40PM +0100, Joshua Kite wrote:
> After many, many hours and much reading of forums I have restored my X
> environment although at the moment only with the nv driver, not the
> nvidia driver. The problem is clearly a result of the change in module
> location and pack
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 11:17:28AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 19:24 +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 07:17:40PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 02:24:21AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > > > Pai
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 02:24:21AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Painfully, we may have to proceed without freetype support in Xprint
> after all.
AIUI, the non-freeness issue I raised on xorg-modular, would certainly
violate the DFSG?
> After applying the libxfont patch, Xprt is able to start, an
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 07:17:40PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 02:24:21AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > Painfully, we may have to proceed without freetype support in Xprint
> > after all.
>
> AIUI, the non-freeness issue I raised on xorg-mod
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 01:18:44PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> * Steve Langasek [Sun, Apr 16 2006, 01:19:35AM]:
> > To expand on Daniel's closure message: X11R6 is dead, and this directory
> > needs to be removed so it can be replaced with a compatibility symlink.
> > Otherwise, the t
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 12:13:43PM +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
> It seems that the font organization is completely crazy now:
> - X cannot find the fixed font anymore:
> The fixed enty in fonts.alias in /usr/share/fonts/X11/misc is not
> included in the fonts.dir file
> - there are still tw
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 11:40:38AM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Today, "apt-get dselect-upgrade" wants to remove several packages,
> e.g. "xfs", presumably due to new conflicts by xorg.
>
> I checked for a bug report on "xfs" and found none. Have all the
> maintainers of newly-uninstallable p
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 01:43:12PM +0200, Petter Sundlöf wrote:
> Hello. On unstable.
>
> [...]
>
> I get this error message from GNOME:
>
> [...]
>
> If you report this situation as a bug, please include:
^
> - The result of xprop -root | gr
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 11:19:01AM +0200, Moulin Yoann wrote:
> keyboard unusable under x, no shift, no alt and no altgr works
Install xkb-data, as the recommendation states.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 11:58:10PM -0500, Guillermo Salas M. wrote:
> > Same error with spanish keyboard: AltGr doesn't works (and at, ntilde,
> > ccedil)
>
> I had the same trouble, was fixed instaling xkb-data and runing
> dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg
> and selecting latam as layout (I'm using
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 12:18:25PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> After the xorg upgrade, the german keymap (xorg/de/pc105/nodeadkeys)
> lacks any entries for keys with alt-gr (mapped to alt_r) modifier.
>
> [...]
>
> As the german keyboard layout have essential keys like @ or | as keys
> with alt-
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 04:24:54PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> xbase-clients fails to build for me in various ways.
>
> "normal" build:
> checking for library containing glXGetProcAddress... no
> configure: error: cannot find GL library - make sure Mesa or other OpenGL
> package is installe
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 12:14:40PM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
> Is someone taking this one seriously ?
No.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 11:10:47PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> No, because one may use xkb-data without an X server, for instance I
> believe that the console keyboard driver for the Hurd uses those
> XKB files. This dependency would then be harmful to them.
cxkb does the same thing for the Lin
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 10:41:39PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 11:07:33PM +0200, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 09:27:00PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > > Where can we find documentation about moving conffiles between package
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 09:27:00PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 12:17:49PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> > > dpkg: error processing
> > > /var/cache/apt/archives/x11-common_6.9.0.dfsg.1-4_all.deb (--unpack):
> > > trying to overwrite `/etc/X11/Xsession', which is also in p
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 12:47:43AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 01:31:11AM +0200, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Right, so you need B-Ds on x11proto-xext-dev, libxtrans-dev, libxau-dev,
> > x11proto-xcmisc-dev, x11proto-kb-dev, x11proto-input-dev. You'd nee
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 11:59:58PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 11:50:34PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 11:03:32PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > Anyway, the package checks for a "inputproto.pc" file directly.
> > > It doesn't check for xextproto.p
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 11:59:39PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 12:18:43AM +0200, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 10:49:50PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 07:49:42PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > >
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 10:49:50PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 07:49:42PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > Your package is still failing to build. First I get:
> > checking for XKBPROTO... configure: error: Package requirements
> [...]
> > Which seems to be a missing build d
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 12:13:11AM -0800, Devin Carraway wrote:
> Here's a patch which adopts the php4-config method of determining the PHP API,
> as suggested by Bug#321324. It also includes a fix for Bug#326378 (attached
> redundantly there also).
>
> Daniel, unless you have objections, I'll up
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 11:35:03PM -0800, Devin Carraway wrote:
> dbtcp builds just fine with libreadline5-dev. Tentative patch attached.
Please NMU the package if you have absolutely no interest in it and this
is just a passing transition patch. If, however, you are at all
interested in dbtcp,
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 12:18:26PM -0800, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Also to Sven, please realize there's a reason Debian has (or hasn't) or a
> non-free section. If we really didn't care about anyone using non-free
> software, non-free wouldn't exist in the first place. Maybe 30% of installs
> m
Package: libnss-db
Version: 2.2.3pre1-1
Severity: critical
Justification: smashes entire system with WORLD-ENDING levels of breakage
Hi,
Using libnss-db from sid results in some rather, er, unpleasant
behaviour. With the group files below, and 'group: compat db' in
nsswitch.conf, anything that at
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 11:21:32PM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Right, I was talking about having xserver-xorg do it as well. Let me
> rephrase a bit:
>
> I believe the nvidia packages in debian are doing it right now because
> they had to be coinstallable with xserver-xfree86. Since xorg is the
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 11:03:12PM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This has been an ongoing thing, I thought, and could be solved with a
> dpkg-divert, rather than a conflicts line.
Yes, as nvidia-glx already does for libGLcore. It hasn't updated its
diversions for xserver-xorg yet, so it spuriously
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 06:21:06AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 11:52:45PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Obviously, this is nvidia-glx's problem, not xorg's.
>
> The nvidia-glx package exists, and was here first. You don't get to say
>
reassign 338715 nvidia-glx
kthxbye
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 02:17:17AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> The xserver-xorg package in experimental can't be installed on a system
> where nvidia-glx is also installed:
>
> # dpkg -i ../xserver-xorg_6.8.99.901.dfsg.1-2.1_i386.deb
> (Reading database ... 1
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 06:25:36PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> The attached patch, which comes from upstream by way of Jay Estabrook
> at HP, adds the necessary handling for the additional relocation type on
> Alpha, fixing the latest segfault. As per the name, it should slip
> right into the p
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 12:15:55PM -0700, Larry Doolittle wrote:
> 2. Write a real fix, instead of the stupid s_popen thing.
>
> I might play around with option 2. There are two strategies
> that make technical sense:
Why would you do this when there's already a version upstream that fixes
this?
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 01:24:40PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Andreas Barth [2005-03-18 10:29 +0100]:
> > Automatic build of postgresql-7.4_1:7.4.7-1 on notos by sbuild/powerpc
> > 1.170.5
> > /usr/include/tcl8.4/tk.h:96:29: X11/Xlib.h: No such file or directory
>
> I really don't understand thi
59 matches
Mail list logo
