reassign 862787 ddclient
severity 862787 normal
thanks
Quoting luciano (fran...@modula.net):
> Package: debconf
> Version: 1.5.56
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropr
Quoting Guillaume Brochu (guillaume.bro...@gmail.com):
> This modification was introduced in June 2012:
>
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/geneweb.git/commit/?id=16cddde963e4169c09bfe49cb6949fe0dc484f0c
>
> At first sight, I don't see any reason to use compression level 9, so I wil
Quoting Marc J. Driftmeyer (m...@reanimality.com):
> Gotta love when testing isn't thorough.
What exactly was your intention when adding this information to this
already reported bug?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Quoting James Cowgill (jcowg...@debian.org):
> Control: reassign 820800 fontforge
> Control: forcemerge -1 820800
> Control: retitle -1 fontforge: undefined symbol: png_longjmp
> Control: tags -1 patch pending
>
> Hi,
>
> This bug seems to be caused by incorrect detection of libpng16 in the
> con
Quoting Chris Lamb (la...@debian.org):
> Source: garmin-plugin
> Version: 0.3.23-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to build from source
> User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs
> X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
>
> Dear Maintainer,
Quoting Peter Gervai (g...@grin.hu):
> Package: geneweb
> Version: 6.08dfsg-3.1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
>
> Build fails with
> iconv: conversion from `Binary' is not supported
> on ca language file. The prob
severity 810849 important
thanks
Quoting Christian Petersen (cpeter...@list.ru):
> Subject: fontforge: segfault after start
> Package: fontforge
> Version: 20120731.b-7.1
> Severity: grave
>
> *** Please type your report below this line ***
>
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> Fontforge segfaults after
Quoting Dominic Hargreaves (d...@earth.li):
> Here's the patch.
Please go ahead with the NMU. I really fail to see when I can spare
enough time to catchup on these issues...
Thanks a lot for your followups, indeed.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Quoting Dirk Hohndel (d...@hohndel.org):
> We have asked SPECIFICALLY Debian to stop providing an out-dated version
> of Subsurface to its users as that caused confusion and problems for our
> users and support burdon for us. Debian was unwilling to follow our
> choices of open source components t
> libgit,... well I'm not really into the subsurface code, but I never
> understood why you introduced that as a storage backend.
> Even the most prolific divers I know don't have more then 30k-50k
> dives, and usually these people stopped logging there day to day dives
> decades ago.
> Using a pl
Quoting Salvo Tomaselli (tipos...@tiscali.it):
> tags: wontfix
> thanks
>
>
> Libgit2 breaks API at every minor release.
>
> Subsurface insists on using it.
>
> Subsurface's upstream does not like distributions and will make packaging
> more
> and more difficult on purpose, to discourage dist
Quoting Mateusz Kijowski (mateusz.kijow...@gmail.com):
> Package: pytrainer
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> The pytrainer package seems to have disappeared from the Archive. The PTS
> https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/pytrainer.html suggests that the reason for
> rem
Quoting Dejan Latinovic (dejan.latino...@imgtec.com):
>
> Hello,
>
> I had noticed that the gui part builds with target "all"
> even if the main target is "out".
> Beside that, in gui/Makefile OCAMLC variable is redefined and ocamlc.opt is
> used instead of
> ocamlc (defined in Makefile.inc).
>
Control: reopen -1
> Well it failed again on a few arches.
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=geneweb
And again, with my other naive fix...:-(
Looks like this has to be investigated more carefully
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
> Quoting James Cowgill (james...@cowgill.org.uk):
> > Source: geneweb
> > Version: 6.06-1
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > geneweb has FTBFS on various arches (arm64, mips, mipsel, ppc64el,
&g
Quoting James Cowgill (james...@cowgill.org.uk):
> Source: geneweb
> Version: 6.06-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> geneweb has FTBFS on various arches (arm64, mips, mipsel, ppc64el,
> s390x) since 6.06-1 all with errors similar to:
>
> >make[3]: Entering directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»/gui'
> > Plea
Le 21/01/2015 18:37, James Cowgill a écrit :
Source: geneweb
Version: 6.06-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
geneweb has FTBFS on various arches (arm64, mips, mipsel, ppc64el,
s390x) since 6.06-1 all with errors similar to:
Indeed. Thanks for pointing this.
I'm afraid that it will prevent 6.08 to be
severity 774670 important
thanks
Quoting Brent S. Elmer (webe...@aim.com):
> Package: eject
> Version: 2.1.5+deb1+cvs20081104-13.1
> Severity: grave
>
> The cdrom on my lenovo w500 will not eject. I played an audio CD in
> alsaplayer
> and when the CD was done, the CD would not eject using the
Quoting Salvo Tomaselli (tipos...@tiscali.it):
> On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 07:28:25 +0100 Christian PERRIER
> wrote:
> > Please leave me a chance to try fixing the issue by a maintainer
> > upload. I'm not the usual uploader for subsurface (Sylvestre is) and
> > then I lef
Quoting Salvo Tomaselli (tipos...@tiscali.it):
> Hello,
>
> I attach the fix I made. I've downloaded and added the missing source within
> the debian/ directory.
>
> If the maintainer doesn't respond within 3 days, I will ask another DD to
> sponsor an nmu with the fix.
>
> I've also removed 2
patch which I intend to apply in jessie,
after seeking approval by the release team.
- Forwarded message from "Dr. Markus Waldeck" -
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2014 14:27:36 +0100
From: "Dr. Markus Waldeck"
To: Christian Perrier
Cc: Simon Ruderich
Subject: shadow (1:4.2-2
Quoting Eduard Bloch (e...@gmx.de):
> Template: encfs/security-information
> Type: note
> _Description: Encfs Security Information
Besides using an Evil Debconf Note (;-) ), is there a reason for
capitalizing every noun in the note title ?
BTW, that might be a use case for the debconf "error" da
Quoting Tobias Frost (t...@debian.org):
> tags 748386 + pending
> thanks
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for subsurface (versioned as 4.0.3-2.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it longer.
Thanks for your work (as pkg-running team mem
Quoting Philip Mu?kovac (yo...@gmx.net):
> Package: debian-installer
> Version: 20140316
> Severity: serious
> Tags: d-i patch
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
>
> The makefile currently uses -perm +0111 to find files which have to be be
> processed
Le 01/06/2014 14:33, Thomas Koch a écrit :
Source: shadow
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I'm backporting shadow (for myself so far) from Sid and had to install
autopoint to build it
severity 659878 important
thanks
The rationale for setting this bug report as release critical is
really vague for me. "breaks other software" hasn't been really
explained in details : it "breaks" su for some specific uses of it, so
it may fit the definition of important but certainly not the one
Quoting Aaron M. Ucko (u...@debian.org):
> Source: antpm
> Version: 1.16-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to build from source
>
> Builds of antpm explicitly targetting only its architecture-dependent
> binary packages (as on the autobuilders, or with debuild -B or the
> like) have bee
severity 744877 normal
thanks
Quoting Philippe Grégoire (gregoi...@hotmail.com):
> Package: passwd
> Version: 1:4.2-1
> Severity: grave
>
> Hi,
>
> Recently, subuid/subgid support was added to passwd through a serie of
> patches.
> In commit, 68fb7a, those patches were later merged to form the
Quoting bastien ROUCARIES (roucaries.bast...@gmail.com):
> Package: geneweb
> Severity: serious
> Version: 6.07-2
> user: debian...@lists.debian.org
> usertags: source-is-missing
> severity: serious
> X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@debian.org
>
> Hi,
>
> Your package seems to include some files that lac
severity 744333 wishlist
thanks
I really should use a spellchecker..;-)
>
> Quoting Samuel Bronson (naes...@gmail.com):
> > Package: fonts-cmu
> > Version: 0.7.0-2
> > Severity: serious
> > User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: source-is-missing
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Your package seems
severity 744333 whishlist
thanks
Quoting Samuel Bronson (naes...@gmail.com):
> Package: fonts-cmu
> Version: 0.7.0-2
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: source-is-missing
>
> Hi,
>
> Your package seems to include some files that lack source in the
> prefered form f
Quoting Christian Perrier (bubu...@debian.org):
> Package: garmin-ant-downloader
> Version: 20110626-1
> Severity: serious
>
> g-a-t seems unusable on amd64. Apparently, as soon as it is launched
> AND an ANT+ stick is present, it then segfaults:
>
>
> $ ./gant
>
Package: garmin-ant-downloader
Version: 20110626-1
Severity: serious
g-a-t seems unusable on amd64. Apparently, as soon as it is launched
AND an ANT+ stick is present, it then segfaults:
$ ./gant
Erreur de segmentation
I somehow suspect this might be related to the following warning
during com
Quoting David Prévot (taf...@debian.org):
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Le 08/02/2014 23:05, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
> > On 02/09/2014 03:06 AM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>
> >> Template #1 in /var/lib/dpkg/info/nova-common.templates does not contain
>
Quoting Sven Joachim (svenj...@gmx.de):
> Could you please also restore the Provides? Right now, I don't have
> ttf-freefont installed but upgrading would force me to so.
Thanks for the reminder. A -4 package is on its way with that fix too.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Quoting Sven Joachim (svenj...@gmx.de):
> Source: fonts-freefont
> Version: 20120503-2
> Severity: serious
>
> This version of fonts-freefont dropped both the transitional package and
> the Provides for ttf-freefont, claiming in the changelog that there are
> no reverse dependencies. I don't know
Quoting David Suárez (david.sephi...@gmail.com):
> Source: fonts-junicode
> Version: 0.7.8-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: jessie sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20131128 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your p
(please don't CC me to answers, I'm subscribed to the BTS)
Quoting Thomas Dreibholz (dre...@iem.uni-due.de):
> Tirsdag 22. oktober 2013 13.06.05 skrev Christian PERRIER:
> > Quoting Thomas Dreibholz (dre...@iem.uni-due.de):
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
Quoting Thomas Dreibholz (dre...@iem.uni-due.de):
> Hi,
>
> why has reiserfs support been removed before useful tools to convert reiserfs
Because the kernel does not longer provide reiserfs modules?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Quoting Steve Langasek (vor...@debian.org):
> As far as I'm concerned, the correct method of dealing with such a bug is to
> *remove* the list of individual copyright holders and replace it with a
> simple "Copyright: - $primary_contributor et al." It is not
> reasonable to hold packages
severity 719477 important
thanks
Quoting Matteo Settenvini (matteo...@member.fsf.org):
> Package: winbind
> Version: 2:4.0.8+dfsg-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 9.1.4
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> the systemd service file for winbind is not able to start the daemon
> for samba versions
Quoting Ansgar Burchardt (ans...@debian.org):
> Package: partman-reiserfs
> Version: 54
> Severity: serious
>
> partman-reiserfs depends on reiserfs-modules which is no longer built by
> linux. From the changelog for linux_3.10.1-1:
>
> | * udeb: Remove obsolete and unsupported drivers and files
Quoting Ansgar Burchardt (ans...@debian.org):
> Package: partman-ufs
> Version: 15
> Severity: serious
>
> partman-ufs depends on ufs-modules which is no longer built by
> linux. From the changelog for linux_3.10.1-1:
>
> | * udeb: Remove obsolete and unsupported drivers and filesystems
> |-
Quoting Ansgar Burchardt (ans...@debian.org):
> Package: rescue-mode
> Version: 1.37
> Severity: serious
>
> rescue-mode depends on reiserfs-modules which is no longer built by
> linux. From the changelog for linux_3.10.1-1:
>
> | * udeb: Remove obsolete and unsupported drivers and filesystems
>
Quoting Hideki Yamane (henr...@debian.or.jp):
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 14:49:30 +0200
> Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > > Sounds like libgettext-ruby1.8 should be replaced by ruby-gettext in
> > > build dependencies.
>
> Thanks for the patch, but it seems
Quoting Samuel Thibault (sthiba...@debian.org):
> Control: tags -1 + pending
>
> David Suárez, le Sat 22 Jun 2013 14:42:38 +0200, a écrit :
> > > cc -o test/run test/test_inet_mton.o test/test_inet_ptom.o
> > > test/test_netcfg_parse_cidr_address.o test/test_netcfg_network_address.o
> > > test/t
Quoting Hans Putter (put...@online.de):
> grub-mkconfig sends a warning. Again : Destroying data which are
> absolutely necessary for booting is extremly irresponsible when
> executed without any precautions.
You probably want to use less rude words, don't you?
signature.asc
Description: Digi
tags -1 patch
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
>
> > > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > > sbuild-build-depends-ttf-cjk-compact-dummy : Depends: libgettext-ruby1.8
> > > but it is not installable
> > > E: Unable to
> > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > sbuild-build-depends-ttf-cjk-compact-dummy : Depends: libgettext-ruby1.8
> > but it is not installable
> > E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
> > apt-get failed.
Sounds like libgettext-ruby1.8 should be replaced
Quoting Raphael Hertzog (hert...@debian.org):
> But the above Depends line is strange, it looks like it would be missing
> ${shlibs:Depends} since we have no libc6 dependency and so on.
*this* is fixed in git and in the "samba" (4.0.6) package that was
uplaoded yesterday to experimental by Ivo D
Quoting Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (po...@debian.org):
> reassign 712556 libgbm1
> thanks
>
> On 17/06/13 07:41, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Not usre if that belongs to python-gtk2. When I launch pytrainer (a
> > logging tool for sports activities, written in Python and using
forcemerge 711368 711705
thanks
Quoting Juhapekka Tolvanen (juht...@iki.fi):
>
> Package: fonts-taml
> Version: 2:1.3
> Severity: grave
>
>
> I think everything was said in Subject. Do I really need to say more?
Except that the bug is serious, not grave, and that it was already
reported, no..
Quoting Richard Hartmann (richih.mailingl...@gmail.com):
> As per IRC, I submitted a bug with an attached patch for release-notes.
>
> It documents the possible workaround of adding both squeeze and wheezy
> sources to sources.list.
>
> Please see #706684 [1] for details.
It has just been commit
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
> Cyril Brulebois (29/04/2013):
> > While I haven't reviewed the patch yet, having the l10n bits in sync
> > was a point I had in mind this very morning, so I'm glad you did
> > that. And indeed, some feedback ASAP would be nice. I'll try to look
> > into
Quoting Vincent McIntyre (vincent.mcint...@csiro.au):
> Hi,
> Thanks for the comments I've received on this patch.
> I did some reading to see how other packages handle the issues raised.
> I found grub-pc and iso-scan particularly helpful.
> Hopefully this attempt is better. Less than a week from
Quoting Vincent McIntyre (vincent.mcint...@csiro.au):
> b) modify po/sublevel1/template.po to point to the new question like this:
> #. Type: select
> #. Choices
> #: ../choose-mirror-bin.templates.http-in:2001
> #: ../choose-mirror-bin.templates.ftp.sel-in:2001
> +#: ../grub-installer.templat
reassign 706112 grub-installer
thanks
Quoting Schloss (schloss.kirchlau...@yandex.ru):
> Package: debian-installer
> Severity: serious
>
> Default x86_64 Installation CD of Wheezy has next bug:
> - while it is asking to install bootloader it isn't asking where to
> install bootloader
>
> In this
severity 705971 normal
thanks
Quoting Stefano Forli (ntro...@gmail.com):
> Package: debian-installer
> Version: 20130415
> Severity: critical
> Tags: installation, wheezy, console-setup
>
> It seems that if a TTY console is in use during the installation, the
> whole installation process hangs an
Quoting Ivo De Decker (ivo.dedec...@ugent.be):
> Hi Christian,
>
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 07:11:09AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > > I agree; I'm not sure we're going to get a perfect fix here, so we should
> > > at
> > > least get the 90
Quoting Steve Langasek (vor...@debian.org):
> I agree; I'm not sure we're going to get a perfect fix here, so we should at
> least get the 90% fix in ASAP.
I would have agreed toif I had time to do itbut Ivo was faster
than me..:-)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
o /var/lib/samba,
+ where it belongs according to the FHS. Closes: #454770.
+
+ -- Christian Perrier Sun, 14 Apr 2013 15:30:05 +0200
+
samba (2:3.6.6-5) unstable; urgency=high
* Security update
Index: debian/patches/fhs-filespaths.patch
==
severity 704748 important
thanks
According to the thread that follows
https://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2013/04/msg4.html, Gnome is
too broken on kFreeBSD to be considered useful.
As a consequence, having the desktop-gnome task broken on kFreeBSD
because of the dependency on n-m-gnome can b
severity 705040 important
tags 705040 unreproducible
thanks
Quoting Vincent Lhote (deb...@vincent.lhote.name):
> Package: virtaal
> Version: 0.7.1-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> When opening any po file, including the tutorial one, the prog
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
> Christian PERRIER (09/04/2013):
> > After some resyncing in master (it still had the "drop menu" change),
> > I come up with the attached debdiff wrt 3.14+nmu1.
>
> Couldn't we just pretend 3.14+nmu1 never happened?
d with the right bug number this time.
After some resyncing in master (it still had the "drop menu" change),
I come up with the attached debdiff wrt 3.14+nmu1.
Basically:
[ Christian Perrier ]
* Add iw package to Recommends for the laptop and desktop tasks,
so that the 'iw&
Quoting Benjamin Cama (benjamin.c...@telecom-bretagne.eu):
> Hi,
>
> Pulling gnupg just to extract the cleartext of a PGP signed message
> seems a bit too much for me. I stumbled upon this while in
> debian-installer, which didn't depend on gnupg, only pgpv, until now.
> This looks really overkill
severity 703404 important
thanks
Quoting Tycho Lursen (tycholur...@gmail.com):
> Package: debian-installer
> Version: wheezy
> Severity: critical
> Tags: d-i
> Justification: breaks the whole system
No, it doesn't. :-). Hence lowering the severity.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
severity 685469 important
thanks
From the bug log, it seems that this bug now only happens when
upgrading from a version of the package in backports.d.o
If I'm right, the bug should then be downgraded to "important". We
shouldn't keep "RC" bugs that are not RC in sight of people who are
working t
reassign 699656 src:linux
forcemerge 693083 699656
thanks
Quoting marc (marc_sm...@gmx.com):
> I already reported this bug for the previous version of kernel [bug report
> #693083], but the problem is still unsolved.++
Hello,
As #693083 is still opened, I fail to see why you're opening yet
anot
Quoting Guillem Jover (guil...@debian.org):
> I'll check this further and most probably reassign to the other
> packages.
And probably lower the bug severity, as IMHO, "grave" (or any RC
severity) is overflated.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Quoting Damyan Ivanov (d...@debian.org):
> All help is certainly welcome, especially if the original reporter's
> situation can be tested for all (nine!) binary packages -- upgrade
> from lenny to squeeze to wheezy. The two commits can be cherry-picked
> in wheezy-rooted branch.
Well, I'm not
Quoting Steven Chamberlain (ste...@pyro.eu.org):
> Patch for this actually just a diff limited to ./grub-installer from:
>
> $ git revert a070f516 99389d59 926cee22
Agreed from my side. I guess we now just need Cyril's ACK to apply in
git and probably buildunless something else is needed in
Quoting Noel David Torres Taño (env...@rolamasao.org):
> I'll be happy to provide an updated package with the latest translations and
> pointed to non-free (altough I'm not yet convinced the data are not free) but
> I'll need a sponsor.
/me raises hand.
signature.asc
Description: Digital si
Quoting Mario Izquierdo (mariodeb...@gmail.com):
> El jue, 03-01-2013 a las 08:07 +0100, Christian PERRIER escribió:
> > Quoting Mario Izquierdo (mariodeb...@gmail.com):
> > > Sorry for late response...
> > >
> > >
> > > I uploaded to mentors:
> &g
less you have *very very* good reasons and probably a pre-approval
by the release team, I'd recommend adding only what's needed to fix
the release critical bug.
>
>
> El mar, 01-01-2013 a las 19:42 +0100, Christian PERRIER escribió:
> > Quoting Mario on December 18th:
>
Quoting Hector Oron (hector.o...@gmail.com):
> Hi,
>
> 2013/1/2 Cyril Brulebois :
> > Christian PERRIER (29/12/2012):
>
> >> > u-boot-tools is only in “Suggests” for flash-kernel, while your
> >> > situation suggests it might be better to have it in
Quoting Mario on December 18th:
"I will prepare a new package this week. If my current sponsor can't upload
I will contact you."
We're no longer "this week", so either you couldn't prepare a new
package.or your usual sponsor couldn't upload.:-)
If you're lacking time to prepare the package,
Hello Bastien,
You offered a sponsored upload to fix #694352 but Michael Gilbert's
review is right and I'm afraid that no DD would upload the proposed
package until Michael suggestions are applied (at least, I wouldn't
until the previous maintainer names removal from README.Debian isn't
fixed).
I
Hello Damyan?
I wonder why this RC bug isn't fixed yet, as you apparently pushed a
fix in the package's GIT repository.
I would be happy to NMU the package with the fix you committed, but
why not upload it yourself?
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ssage. The existing code
+only handled the first message of it, thus, ignoring the remaining
+interfaces. This causes a bug in conntrackd. Report 8b15e48 from upstream.
+(Closes: #684863).
+
+ -- Christian Perrier Tue, 01 Jan 2013 19:19:15 +0100
+
libnfnetlink (1.0.0-1) unstable; ur
severity 684708 important
thanks
After reading this bug's log, I'm not entirely convinced that it is
release critical and severity serious:
serious
is a severe violation of Debian policy (roughly, it violates a
"must" or "required" directive), or, in the package maintainer'
rémy Bobbio for providing the patch and analysis.
+Closes: #673042
+
+ -- Christian Perrier Tue, 01 Jan 2013 14:44:03 +0100
+
parted (2.3-11) unstable; urgency=medium
* Non-maintainer upload to fix partitioned md devices (bug #684713)
diff -u parted-2.3/debian/patches/series parted-2.3
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
> release and that it's not planned to happen in 2012, I'll be fine with
s/2012/2014
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Quoting Daniel Baumann (daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net):
> since you put yourself into uploaders of live-installer some time ago,
> maybe you want to look at it yourself too?
You know the reasons for this: be able to do l10n upload when needed
without them to be considered NMUs. That's
I can reproduce this bug. No idea what are those "Google gadgets"
aboutbut definitely trying to "download" some makes plasma-desktop
crash very consistently.
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
severity 655757 important
thanks
Once again, I think we have here a bug severity that is overflated.
Let's re-read the definition of "grave":
makes the package in question unusable or mostly so, or causes
data loss, or introduces a security hole allowing access to the
Quoting Daniel Baumann (daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net):
> severity 646704 serious
> thanks
>
> On 12/29/2012 0502 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > This bug doesn't fit the definition of "serious" as it only shows up
> > for a precise set of insta
retitle 681654 kstars-data-extra-tycho2: should be moved to non-free
thanks
After reading this bug log, I'm convinced that the only remaining
issue is the failure to comply with DFSG #6.
As a consequence, the solution is obvious : this package should be
moved to non-free.
I'm ready to help in up
severity 679917 important
thanks
As there is a workaround for this bug (see bug log) and also because
the bug maybe didn't deserve an RC severity from the beginning, I'm
hereby downgrading this severity.
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
severity 646704 important
thanks
This bug doesn't fit the definition of "serious" as it only shows up
for a precise set of installation types, those not being the most
common, particularly when people use the Live CD to install.
Downgrading to "important" as per the definition of "improtant" seve
Subject says it all. I'm tempted to think that at least the mips and
i386 failures were just a transient failure and the builds should just
be reattempted.
But I may be mistaken
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tags 690902 moreinfo
severity 690902 normal
thanks
I don't think that gnome-shell segfaulting randomly only for one user
(no other user reported this) should be RC.
Anyway, if you want this bug to be dealt with, you need to follow
advices that have been given in the bug log:
"Check /home/YOURUSE
severity 690066 important
thanks
I don't think this bug is release critical. The right severity, for
me, seems to be "important".
OK, one could argue about "dataloss" but someone opening a file
created in a format that is not native to LO, then modifying the file,
then saving it.should not ye
severity 695131 important
thanks
As much as I understand Aoki-san's wish to get this bug fixed, I don't
think it fits the definition of a release critical bug. Even more
because the purpose of g-c-c is not only configuring USB printers. So,
a failure in this feature doesn't make the package comple
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
> Hi, and thanks for your report.
>
> u-boot-tools is only in “Suggests” for flash-kernel, while your
> situation suggests it might be better to have it in “Recommends”.
> What do others think?
Well, I even moved it to Depends in my commit. I'm not sure
severity 696434 serious
thanks
Quoting Gerardo Esteban Malazdrewicz (gera...@malazdrewicz.com.ar):
> Package: convmv
> Version: 1.15-1
> Severity: grave
> Tags: patch
> Justification: renders package unusable
Doh.
Working on a fix. Plmease don't NMU (the package has this bug only in
experimenta
severity 695472 important
thanks
Quoting Santiago Vila (sanv...@unex.es):
> Of course, feel free to downgrade or reassign as appropriate.
...which is what I'm doing right now. IMHO, this bug (if it's one in
samba) doesn't fit the definition of "serious", more particularly
because it comes in a v
severity 692540 important
thanks
Quoting Praveen A (prav...@gmail.com):
> package: debian-installer
> severity: critical
>
> I was not able to complete installations as it got stuck with
> "Configuring apt " step. I was able to install it with English. I will
> try to have some more people test i
Quoting Paul Gevers (elb...@debian.org):
> Hi all involved,
>
> [This is a ping].
>
> Reading through RC bug 538822 and 540512 (which were already RC during
> Squeeze release in 2010) I have the feeling that it is known how these
> bug could be fixed and changes are available in the git repositor
Quoting intrigeri (intrig...@debian.org):
> ... else, this script exits, umount is never run, and a dangling
> grub-mount process is left behind.
.../...
Impressive analysis and solution. Anyone objecting to /me committing
intrigeri's fix?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
1 - 100 of 755 matches
Mail list logo
