Package: lightdm
Followup-For: Bug #1038611
Can't reproduce, starts up just fine for me.
Could you perhaps include the logs from `/var/log/lightdm/´?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers stable-security
APT policy: (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'proposed-updates')
when you try to install one of these packages directly?
eg., 'apt-get install fp-units-gnome1'?
> 2) fp-units-gtk [Not Installed]
> 3) fpc [Not Installed]
> 4) libcairo2-dev [Not Installed]
> 5) libgtk2.0-dev [Not Installed]
> 6) libpango1.0-dev [Not Inst
Package: icedtea6-plugin
Version: 6b18-1.8-1
Severity: serious
bug-buddy trace/crash report is attached (with both xulrunner-1.9.1-dbg
and openjdk-6-dbg installed).
Test applet: http://www.java.com/en/download/help/testvm.xml
The following warnings/errors also show up when I try to launch the
br
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 21:31, Randall Donald wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 21:09 -0300, Carlos Laviola wrote:
>> nvidia-glx-ia32 now depends on 'ia32-libx11-6' and 'ia32-libxext6'.
>> Architecture. Those packages aren't in the archive. Am I supposed to
Package: nvidia-glx-ia32
Version: 185.18.14-1
Severity: grave
nvidia-glx-ia32 now depends on 'ia32-libx11-6' and 'ia32-libxext6'.
Architecture. Those packages aren't in the archive. Am I supposed to
be using ia32-apt-get to install them?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT
On 9/3/07, Jochem Berndsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FreePascal as included in the etch distribution does not work on my computer.
> It fails to produce any output, and seems to hang. An strace indicates that
> it waits for ppc386 to terminate, but that never happens.
> There is nothing on the s
eport. I'll investigate it soon.
--
Carlos Laviola
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: polypaudio-x11
Version: 0.7+20050619-3
Severity: grave
$ dpkg -L polypaudio-x11
/.
/usr
/usr/share
/usr/share/lintian
/usr/share/lintian/overrides
/usr/share/lintian/overrides/polypaudio-x11
/usr/share/doc
/usr/share/doc/polypaudio-x11
/usr/share/doc/polypaudio-x11/copyright
/usr/share/do
ual intervention.
I'm a bit puzzled.
--
Carlos Laviola
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
test, test by
going from -1 to -2 to your -2.1 or something.
--
Carlos Laviola
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
new package based on your patch
that also removes the link on prerm if it's not an upgrade.
In the meantime, affected users can just run the command manually and
wait for the new packages, by running the following as root:
update-alternatives --remove pc /usr/bin/fpc
Later,
Carlos
--
Carlos Laviola
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, so I might go with it. Mail me
back if you're interested in knowing what he did.
--
Carlos Laviola
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
uld be ironed out soon.
Thanks,
Carlos.
--
Carlos Laviola
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
13 matches
Mail list logo
