Hello Santiago, thanks for the report.
I could reproduce the issue on my box.
I will try to fix this during the next week-end.
Cheers,
Jerome
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36
automatic reassignment.
Kind regards
A tool for automatically removing packages from unstable
This bug report has been automatically filed with little human intervention.
If the filing is unclear or in error, don't hesitate to contact
Helmut Grohne for assistance.
--
Jerome BENOIT | calcul
Hello Lucas, thanks for the report.
The issue appeared to be fixed in version 4.3.2-p16.
I am on my way to bring this new version to experimental.
Best wishes, Jerome
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D
18/11/2023 15:28, Preuße, Hilmar wrote:
On 18.11.2023 14:57, Jerome Benoit wrote:
Hi,
Hi, the issue appeared to me within a Sid schroot environment
at postinstallation time of tex-common.
I traced it back to texlive-binaries by looking the logfile at
the fmutils stage. The issue seems to
Package: texlive-binaries
Version: 2023.20230311.66589-7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
X-Debbugs-Cc: calcu...@rezozer.net
Hi, the issue appeared to me within a Sid schroot environment
at postinstallation time of tex-common.
I traced it back to texlive-binaries by looking
Hello,
as the migration to catch2 v3 appeared not simple,
I finally used the catch2 material provided by the e-antic upstream team.
Best wishes, Jerome
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92
/catchorg/Catch2/blob/devel/docs/migrate-v2-to-v3.md ]
Best wishes,
Jerome
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: nextcloud-desktop
Version: 3.7.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
Nexcloud-Desktop is unable to connect the Nextcloud Server comaplining TLS
initialization failed.
SSL Cert on Server is valid. Access with browser and from another computer
stil
Package: heat-cfntools
Version: 1.4.2-2.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
The package only include the stubs executables and lack the main modules
required to function:
# /usr/bin/cfn-init
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/cfn-init", li
Hell All, I have just made singular independent from brial.
Otherwise it must be keep in mind that Sage is mostly umbrella software.
That means that the dependency of brian on sage material is odd.
Best wishes, Jerome
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Peter, thanks for your report.
I will have a look soon.
Best wishes,
Jerome
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital
e [:3] inside the
tuple(), but that's not exactly a problem.
I will try to step forward by the end of the week-end if no one else
do it before.
Cheers,
Jerome
SR
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D
It can be linked to https://github.com/saltstack/salt/issues/62092.
I have the same issue, and python3-zmq on my system is 24.0.1-1.
rt 3 level python version...
The bug lie in automake not autoconf-archive
Could be workarround by a little sed script in order remove micro version on graph tool
side
Bastien
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28
up in `configure.ac' ?
If so, it was working well before ax_python_devel serial 32 went.
Second, I am not sure that removing micro version for devel stuff is a good
idea.
Best wishes,
Jerome
Bastien
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?l
Package: autoconf-archive
Version: 20220903-1
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: causes FTBFS issues
Dear Maintainer,
it appears that ax_python_devel serial 32 provided by this package
can cause FTBFS issues. I experienced it with the package grap-tool
(#10199
ping
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hello,
the issue was fixed in the upstream version, serial 23 :
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=autoconf-archive.git;a=blob_plain;f=m4/ax_cc_maxopt.m4
hth,
Jerome
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15
so apparently i's all related to the apt command, using the -t option
instead seems to work smoothly:
apt-get install -t bullseye-backports libreoffice
(even without removing/purging libreoffice first)
/pam.d/sshd
is actually distributed along the package `openssh-server` (you can check this
wit apt-file(1)).
For a working (but hopefully temporary) workaround you can have a look to the
aforementionned
bugreport.
Cheers,
Jerome
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org
Fixed in package version 1.0.2+ds-1.
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
all for this situation.
Cheers,
Jerome
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 11:19:36 +0100 Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Thanks for sharing your file.
I will have a closer look soon,
Cheers,
Jerome
ping,
cheers,
Jerome
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5
Thanks for sharing your file.
I will have a closer look soon,
Cheers,
Jerome
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ntication module, to prevent an information leak, as
described in the pam_ssh(8) man page.)
Cheers,
Jerome
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
as mp; print(mp.cpu_count());
Can you get this information ?
In fact, I am curious to know it as well.
Cheers,
Jerome
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
OpenPGP_sign
e are progressing.
Cheers,
Jerome
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
t the upstream author.
Otherwise, is there a way to limit the number of cores to use
through an environment variable (or something along this way) ?
Cheers,
Jerom
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5
I am working on it.
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hello, a closer look on the log files shows that actually
the failed test (elevation) download a corrupted data file on the armhf CI box
by comparison against the size of the same data file downloaded on the other
CI boxes.
It sound pretty much as a subtle bug form some of the dependencies.
Jero
Hi, it appears that I cannot reproduce the issue on the armhf porterbox
amdahl.debian.org .
Cheers Jerome
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hello Paul, it seems that the Restriction needs-internet is not respected.
Cheers, Jerome
--
Jerome BENOIT, Ph.D. | jgmbenoit-at+rezozer*dot_net
https://www.rezozer.net/
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
TypeError: iteration over a 0-d array
/usr/lib/python3.9/multiprocessing/pool.py:771: TypeError
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
antic
Thanks!
Doug
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
packaging the 0.19.0 release?
If not, merkaartor will be removed from Debian again.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
OpenPGP_signature
Description
Package: pev
Version: 0.81-2
Severity: grave
Tags: patch security
Justification: user security hole
X-Debbugs-Cc: benoit.sev...@gmail.com, Debian Security Team
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Dear Dennis, thanks for your reply.
I was rather wondering if setting Rules-Requires-Root to yes in d/rules
will ask to bbuild to act as "needs-root" for autopkgtest.
Jerome
Dear all,
> The autopkgtest probably will have to specify "needs-root" to set
> unprivileged_userns_clone=1 (unless the VM image already has that set
> up), but the test suite itself needn't run as root.w
Will set Rules-Requires-Root to yes in d/rules solve the issue ?
Jerome
Dear Paul Gevers,
please consider to tag #982719 as bullseye-ignore
given that the issue is not a package issue but
it seems rather related to an chroot issue.
Best regards,
Jerome
Dear Dennis, thanks for your message.
I think that the issue is actally not a firehol issue.
But I cannot figure out to where the issue can be redirected.
For now, I am reluctant to neutralize the tests.
@Lucas: do you have any hint ?
Thanks,
Jeromr
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot
Hi Dennis, thanks for confirming.
May I simply neutralize the involved test temporarily ?
Cheers, Jerome
Dear Lucas, thanks for your report.
I can not reproduce the issue on a Sid schroot a the time of writing.
Please, can you confirm the issue on your side ?
Best wishes, Jerome
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28
On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 07:33:56 +0100 Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am currently isolating the faulty code on the porter Eller.
>
> The issue seems to appear after the call to arpack functions,
> so it does not look as an arparck issue.
Finally I isolated the place wher
Hello,
I am currently isolating the faulty code on the porter Eller.
The issue seems to appear after the call to arpack functions,
so it does not look as an arparck issue.
Best wishes,
Jerome
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu
will you take care of this?
I will soon.
Best,
Jerome
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Bas
>
> --
> GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
> Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
>
>
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org
Thanks for the report. I am working on it soon. Best, Jerome
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Thanks for the report. I am working on it soon. Cheers, Jerome
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Thanks for the report. Meanwhile the Sagemath Debian team take a summer break.
Cheers, Jerome
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
Hello Lucas, thanks for the report. I am working on it. Jerome
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: opendmarc
Version: 1.3.2-6+deb10u1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
I started using DMARC and DKIM using both opendkim for signing and verification
of DKIM Signatures
and opendmarc to check policies regarding domain alignment, report failurs,
rej
e the sagetex.sty
>> is not available.
>>
> This is of course non-sense: the sagetex.sty is created during package
> build.
>
> Hilmar
>
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
ty does not solve the issue.
> Leaving out debianization-examples.patch at least solves the issue.
>
>> - you need to declare a BD on sagetex itself, else the sagetex.sty
>> is not available.
>>
> This is of course non-sense: the sagetex.sty is created during package
&g
to declare a BD on sagetex itself, else the sagetex.sty
>> is not available.
>>
> This is of course non-sense: the sagetex.sty is created during package
> build.
>
> Hilmar
>
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=
Hello Hilmar,
On 10/05/2020 14:06, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> Am 10.05.2020 um 08:46 teilte Jerome BENOIT mit:
>
> Hi Jerome,
>
>> Hello Graham, thanks for the report.
>> It sounds a Depends issue.
>>
> I guess some style files moved to another Debian package and
'/build/1st/sagetex-3.4+ds'
> make[1]: *** [debian/rules:59: override_dh_auto_test] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory '/build/1st/sagetex-3.4+ds'
> make: *** [debian/rules:28: binary] Error 2
> dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules binary subprocess returned exit status
> 2
>
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Dear Matthias, thanks for your report.
I have just send an email to the Nominatim system administrator
to see what we can do.
Best,
Jerome
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36
Dear Paul, thanks for your report. I can reproduce the issue on my box.
I am working on it. Cheers, Jerome
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
signature.asc
Description
http://www.preining.info
> Accelia Inc. + IFMGA ProGuide + TU Wien + JAIST + TeX Live + Debian Dev
> GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13
>
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
Hello Nordert, thanks for the report. I will fix it next week-end. Cheers,
Jerome.
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
be fixed:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=926784
>
> I have switched to ufw, because firehol is not usable.
>
> So who shall do the above process to make it usable?
>
> If I should do it, you let me know, and I will give you whole record
> of it.
P
>> which was filed against the firehol package:
>>
>> #934089: firehol fails to use iptables-restore
>>
>> It has been closed by Jerome BENOIT (reply to
>> calcu...@rezozer.net).
>>
>> Their explanation is attached below along with your original report.
Dear Jean Louis, thanks for your report.
Have you tried, as suggested in the FireHOL message,
/usr/sbin/firehol nofast try
Please let me know the output of this action, if possible.
Thanks in advance,
Jerome
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php
on.
I will have a look this week end.
Jerome
>
> Cheers,
>
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: e-antic
Version: 0.1.2+ds-2
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: fails to build from source
FTBFS on 32 bit architectures.
Jerome
-- System Information:
Debian Release: Stretch*
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates')
Architecture: amd64 (x
Hello Lucas,
I have tried to reproduce the issue on a clean buster chroot environment:
the package builds without trouble.
Can you please confirm that the issue is fixed on your side ?
Thanks,
Jerome
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login
Dear All,
I think there is a major issue with doxygen:
#921802 , #921776, #921789, and certainly other seem affected by a recent bug
that affect doxygen.
For #921776, I cannot compose the PDF in a Sid environment, but I can compose
it on my Stretch box.
Jerome
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at
Le 16/01/2019 à 13:50, Mike Gabriel a écrit :
Hello mike,
>> A working maintainer address is required. Please either change the
>> maintainer address or get this one fixed.
>>
>> Scott K
>
> We possibly should switch over to a team mail address on tracker.d.o [1]
Hello,
please can you apply the patch that fixes the issue [1,2] ?
[1] https://github.com/spatialaudio/nbsphinx/issues/202
[2] https://github.com/jupyter/nbconvert/pull/924
Thanks,
Jerome
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu
Thanks Adrian !
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
on-nbsphinx as well.
>
> Paul
I am considering to provide Python 2 support for nbsphinx again for Buster.
I am sorry for my mistake. Please give some time.
Jerome
>
>
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.
On 05/01/2019 17:30, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hello,
>
> it appears that both MAXIMA_USERDIR and MPLCONFIGDIR do not take into account
> the environment variable DOT_SAGE .
What I meant here is that sagemath should set MAXIMA_USERDIR (maxima-sage(1))
and MPLCONFIGDIR wrt DOT_SAGE.
DOT_SAGE accept path relative
to the working directory.
Cheers,
Jerome
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
> Inline formula 1 (line 518)
> Inline formula 2 (line 747)
> Sage example 3 (line 797)
> Inline formula 3 (line 797)
> Sage commandline 0 (line 845)
> Sage commandline 1 (line 864)
>
> Error in Sage code on line 867 of sagetex.tex! Traceback follows.
>
> Runn
Dear Helmut, thanks for the report.
At last I have some time before me to have a look.
Can you send a simple script that reproduce the issue ?
Thanks in advance,
Jerome
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D
Thanks for the remainder, I will have a look this week-end,
Jerome
On 19/12/2018 05:32, John Stamp wrote:
> On 05/22/18 08:52 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>>
>> On 22/05/18 23:52, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>>> Hi Jerome,
>>>
>>
On 13/11/2018 16:33, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>
>
> On 13/11/2018 16:23, Russel Winder wrote:
>>
>>> It does not look as a solution anyway.
>>> And the issue does not seem to be a FireHOL issue.
>>> I guess that we have to stick to package 3.1.6+ds-
the debian package from
source,
and them install it.
I have just submitted the issue to the debian-devel debian list (I CCed to you).
As temporary solution, I can submit a package built from a local chroot
environment.
Jerome
>
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
htt
yet. I am hesitant to do this as it
> is clearly not Debian Sid standard and it is not reversible.
>
>
It does not look as a solution anyway.
And the issue does not seem to be a FireHOL issue.
I guess that we have to stick to package 3.1.6+ds-4 for a while.
Jerome
--
Jerome BENOIT |
On 12/11/2018 22:42, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
> You don't happen to have that "move everything from /bin, /sbin, /lib
> to /usr/..." package installed?
Do know have the short name (or regular name) of this package ?
Thanks in advance, Jerome
--
Jerome BENOIT
ct.
>>
>> Can you determine from which package version the faulty install.config come
>> from ?
>>
>
> |> dpkg -S /usr/lib/firehol/install.config
> firehol-common: /usr/lib/firehol/install.config
>
> |> dpkg -S /bin/mktemp
> coreutils: /bin/mktem
ne from which package version the faulty install.config come
from ?
Thanks in advance, Jerome
>
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
:en (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored:
> LC_ALL set to en_GB.UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
> Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
>
> Versions of packages firehol depends on:
> ii firehol-common 3.1.6+ds-5
> ii lsb-base9.20170808
>
> Versions of packages
Hello,
I guess that we have to remove libgal-sage-4 sooner or later:
please let me know when we can remove it.
Thanks,
Jerome
Forwarded Message
Subject: Bug#913447: libgap-sage: Depends on nbs version of gap
Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 23:39:01 +
Resent-From: Jeremy Bic
oading the
> fix, should probably be 7.0.4+ds-4~
I will fix it as sson as I can.
Thanks,
Jerome
>
>
> Andreas
>
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Andreas,
I thought that I fixed this issue.
The difficulty here is that I am blind here:
how can I reproduce the issue on my own ?
Thanks,
Jerome
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762
Please consider to the new upstream version 10
given that the current version of noscript provided in Stretch
does not work with firefox-esr 60.2 recently brought in Stretch.
Thansk, Jerome
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu
Dear Anbe,
so far I cannot reproduce the issue with piupart 0.87~bpo9+1 on my Strecth box:
what would be the command that reproduces the issue ?
Thanks, Jerome
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D
Hello,
On 22/05/18 23:52, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Hi Jerome,
>
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 07:05:26PM +0400, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>> Dear Sebastian, thanks for your warning.
>>
>> The amount of change might be too heavy for me.
>> Second, pam_ssh seems no m
Package: singular
Version: 1:4.0.3-p3+ds-5
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: FTBFS
It appears that coeffs_test fails on most of official architectures:
the issue was reported to upstream:
https://github.com/Singular/Sources/issues/862
Thanks,
Jerome
-- System Information:
Debian
Control: forward -1 https://github.com/fplll/fpylll/issues/114
thanks
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
b6c8e1612e8201206eff3dca6eed769445ace8d1
Author: Jerome Benoit
Date: Fri Feb 2 19:04:08 2018 +0400
Debian patch 0.3.0+ds1-2
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 5354a8a..896edb7 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+fpylll (0.3.0+ds1-2) experimental; urgency
393c0efc81d9bac3738190f28c784427659da9b1
Author: Jerome Benoit
Date: Mon Jan 29 08:52:48 2018 +0400
Debian patch 1.6.6+ds-3
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 6c09f61..9c51b49 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+cysignals (1.6.6+ds-3) unstable; urgency
:51:02 +
Resent-From: Niels Thykier
Resent-To: debian-bugs-d...@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Jerome Benoit
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2018 18:44:34 +0100
From: Niels Thykier
Reply-To: Niels Thykier , 888...@bugs.debian.org
To: Debian Bug Tracking System
Source: cysignals
Version: 1.6.5+ds-2
Severity
Hello Tobias, thanks for the hint. I have just upload a corrected version.
Jerome
On 27/01/18 17:19, Tobias Hansen wrote:
> On 01/27/2018 01:41 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>> Hello Vincent, thanks for your bugreport.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 27/01/18 06:31, Vincent Lef
mor: enabled
>
> libmpfi-dev-common depends on no packages.
>
> Versions of packages libmpfi-dev-common recommends:
> ii libmpfi-dev 1.5.3+ds-1
>
> libmpfi-dev-common suggests no packages.
>
> -- no debconf information
>
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Dear Aaron M. Ucko, thanks for your report.
I have already filled an issue about it:
https://github.com/Normaliz/Normaliz/issues/161
I hope it will be fixed quickly.
Cheers,
Jerome
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
Hello Folks,
it appears that the latest version also shows up issues on i386 arch.
An issue ticket has been emitted:
https://github.com/Normaliz/Normaliz/issues/156 .
Thanks, Jerome
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net
Dear bunk, thanks for your report.
I have just realized that d/watch is obsolete and that normaliz has evolved a
lot
since the last packaging. I am on my way to package the latest version (3.4.0).
So, let see what will happen with this new version.
Thanks, Jerome
--
Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at
1 - 100 of 245 matches
Mail list logo
