Bug#1021810: Should firefox-esr be dropped on 32bit architectures in bookworm?

2022-10-16 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Sat, Oct 15, 2022, at 8:27 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Package: firefox-esr > Version: 102.3.0esr-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: bookworm sid > X-Debbugs-Cc: Carsten Schoenert , > debian-rele...@lists.debian.org, t...@security.debian.org, > debian-...@lists.debian.org > > [ various potentially int

Bug#1017538: dietlibc: FTBFS on armhf: selected processor does not support vldm in ARM mode

2022-08-17 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 12:13 AM Thorsten Glaser wrote: > > Arnd Bergmann dixit: > > >The way the FPU type gets selected in gcc changed with recent versions, > >this was intentional and won't be reverted but it did break packages that > >used the old method. &g

Bug#1017538: dietlibc: FTBFS on armhf: selected processor does not support vldm in ARM mode

2022-08-17 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 8:00 PM Thorsten Glaser wrote: > > Arnd Bergmann dixit: > > >-march=armv7-a+fp instead of -march=armv7-a to pick the right > > “instead of” > > We pass nothing there, and we need a solution (or two distinct > ones) for armel and armhf. I trie

Bug#1017538: dietlibc: FTBFS on armhf: selected processor does not support vldm in ARM mode

2022-08-17 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 7:28 PM Thorsten Glaser wrote: > > tags 1017538 + help > forwarded 1017538 https://lists.debian.org/debian-arm/2022/07/msg00041.html > thanks > > Hi Sebastian, > > instead of filing a bug with the information we already have… > > >arm/__longjmp.S: Assembler messages: > >arm