Dear Julian,
On Sun, 04 May 2025 11:30:18 +0100 Julian Gilbey wrote:
Package: python3-zarr
Version: 3.0.6-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: Antonio Valentino
The python-xarray autopkgtest is failing on s390x, because the arch is
big-endian and so the lookup for the dtype in from_numpy fails
For some reason, this is triggered by ruby-csv. On a pure trixie system
as of today, all tests pass. If I upgrade ruby-csv to the version in
unstable, then that one test fails:
8<8<8<-
$ rspec
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 10:01:36PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2025, 17:41 Mathias Gibbens wrote:
>
> > control: retitle -1 qemu-efi-aarch64: Secure Boot regression for some
> > arm64 VMs
> > control: reassign -1 qemu-efi-aarch64 2025.02-7
> > control: severity -1 serious
> > con
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 12:04:38AM +, Mathias Gibbens wrote:
> control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> Hi Antonio,
>
> I have successfully reproduced the issue on a RaspberryPi 5 with its
> apt sources set to trixie. While not a pure Debian environment, it's
> th
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 15:08:13 +0530 Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 14:24:34 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > nanoc
> > > ruby-coveralls
> > > ruby-graphlient
>
> This is already removed from the archive.
>
> > > ruby-html-proofer
>
> $ reverse-depends -b ruby-html-proofer
> Revers
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1103018 in ruby-rmagick reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-rmagick/-/commit/e715734c71543d73ecf2
On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 14:24:34 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 05/04/25 at 18:51 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > VCR needs to be updated to support rack 3 / rackup.
> >
> > However, we are stuck with version 5 of VCR, since more recent versions
> > switched to a non-free license (see #984689), an
Control: severity -1 normal
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 07:33:09PM +0200, наб wrote:
> Package: ruby-railties
> Version: 2:6.1.7.10+dfsg-1~deb12u1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 11.4
> File: /usr/bin/rails
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I just got
> $ rails credentials:edit
> No $EDITOR t
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1078643 in rubygems reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/rubygems/-/commit/33ff5f8311f0df9b316c76aa3cbb
more software I wasn't going
to use.
If you want more details, I can explain how I'm doing it.
Best,
Antonio Russo
On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 06:08:27PM +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> Yes, essentially on arm64 the expectations of Debian/base-files and
> systemd have diverged irremediably on this aspect, and should not be
> mixed and matched anymore as it's way too costly to support, and that
> includes nspawn+arm64
On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 12:09:13PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Apr 2025 12:05:17 +0200 Helmut Grohne
> wrote:
> > Control: reopen -1
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 29, 2025 at 01:39:02AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System
> wrote:
> > > It has been closed by Debian FTP Masters
> (reply to Luca B
Hi,
Thanks for your bug report.
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 10:09:29PM +0100, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> I discovered the auto-apt-proxy and saw (thanks to dpkg log) it has
> been installed with my last upgrade.
This is weird as no package depends on or recommends auto-apt-proxy:
$ grep-aptavail -F D
could try to provide an updated version of the package if you want,
but, apparently, the current version in salsa does not build with gbp.
regards
--
Antonio Valentino
close 1100305 0.11.2-2
thanks
On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 05:30:21PM +, Blair Noctis wrote:
> On 14/03/2025 15:34, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 02:49:31PM +, Blair Noctis wrote:
> > > Thus I suggest:
> > >
> > > 1. Update d/control of ruby-faraday, ruby-rack
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 02:49:31PM +, Blair Noctis wrote:
Thus I suggest:
1. Update d/control of ruby-faraday, ruby-rack, ruby-em-spec,
ruby-temple to remove obsolete B-D
2. Update ruby-rack-cache to latest/newer version (1.2 in Debian, 1.17
upstream)
3. Patch and/or ask upstream of ruby-a
close 1094540 2.1.1-4
thanks
Just to clarify for everyone: this is resolved by installing pahole.
Presumably, the solution is to just to make kbuild Depend: on pahole.
Best,
Antonio
OpenPGP_0x72DB026E04C1C768.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Source: ruby-sprockets-rails
Version: 3.5.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: autopkgtest failure
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: rails7
Hi,
We are about to upload rails 7 to unstable, as we are targetting to have rails
7 being released with Trixie.
After the
Source: ruby-with-advisory-lock
Version: 5.1.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: autopkgtest failure
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: rails7
Hi,
We are about to upload rails 7 to unstable, as we are targetting to have rails
7 being released with Trixie.
After
Source: ruby-rspec-rails
Version: 6.1.5-2
Severity: serious
Justification: autopkgtest failure
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: rails7
Hi,
We are about to upload rails 7 to unstable, as we are targetting to have rails
7 being released with Trixie.
After the las
Source: ruby-rabl-rails
Version: 0.6.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: autopkgtest failure
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: rails7
Hi,
We are about to upload rails 7 to unstable, as we are targetting to have rails
7 being released with Trixie.
After the last
Source: ruby-invisible-captcha
Version: 2.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: autopkgtest failure
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: rails7
Hi,
We are about to upload rails 7 to unstable, as we are targetting to have rails
7 being released with Trixie.
After t
Source: ruby-has-scope
Version: 0.8.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: autopkgtest failure
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: rails7
Hi,
We are about to upload rails 7 to unstable, as we are targetting to have rails
7 being released with Trixie.
After the last
Source: ruby-activerecord-import
Version: 1.5.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: autopkgtest failure
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: rails7
Hi,
We are about to upload rails 7 to unstable, as we are targetting to have rails
7 being released with Trixie.
After
Source: ruby-devise
Version: 4.9.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: autopkgtest failure
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: rails7
Hi,
We are about to upload rails 7 to unstable, as we are targetting to have rails
7 being released with Trixie.
After the last upl
Source: ruby-factory-bot-rails
Version: 6.4.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: autopkgtest failure
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: rails7
Hi,
We are about to upload rails 7 to unstable, as we are targetting to have rails
7 being released with Trixie.
After t
Source: ruby-ammeter
Version: 1.1.7-1
Severity: serious
Justification: autopkgtest failure
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: rails7
Hi,
We are about to upload rails 7 to unstable, as we are targetting to have rails
7 being released with Trixie.
After the last up
Source: ruby-acts-as-taggable-on
Version: 10.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: autopkgtest failure
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: rails7
Hi,
We are about to upload rails 7 to unstable, as we are targetting to have rails
7 being released with Trixie.
Afte
Source: ruby-actionpack-page-caching
Version: 1.2.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: autopkgtest failure
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: rails7
Hi,
We are about to upload rails 7 to unstable, as we are targetting to have rails
7 being released with Trixie.
A
Source: debci
Version: 3.11
Severity: serious
Justification: autopkgtest failure
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: rails7
Hi,
We are about to upload rails 7 to unstable, as we are targetting to have rails
7 being released with Trixie.
After the last upload of ra
On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 07:33:35AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 10:04:52PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Source: pcs
> > Version: 0.11.7-2
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > See https://ci.debian.net/packages/p
On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 10:04:52PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: pcs
> Version: 0.11.7-2
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> See https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/pcs/
> It fails with:
>
> test setup: test run
> 113s autopkgtest [13:34:07]: test setup: [---
> 113s Warnin
On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 11:40:11PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 04/02/25 at 22:04 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Source: pcs
> > Version: 0.11.7-2
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > See https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/pcs/
> > It fails with:
> >
> > test setup: test run
> > 113s
close 1094783 4.1.1-4
close 1094533 4.1.1-1
thanks
These bugs have been fixed yesterday but we missed actually closing them in the
BTS.
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1093920 in ruby-capybara reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-capybara/-/commit/91efb6117ae0424605
close 1094534
thanks
This was a temporary problem that is no longer present in unstable.
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1094512 in ruby-oauth2 reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-oauth2/-/commit/47be8bdc47d9b39f7ba37a
loses: #1094055)
+
+ -- Antonio Terceiro Tue, 28 Jan 2025 17:58:19 +0100
+
sass-spec (3.6.3-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload (Closes: #955519)
diff -Nru sass-spec-3.6.3/debian/patches/1001-fix-for-ruby3.3.patch sass-spec-3.6.3/debian/patches/1001-fix-for-ruby3.3.patch
---
Package: rainbows
Version: 5.2.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: does not work at all
Now that ruby-rack 3.0.x has been uploaded to unstable, rainbows fails
several tests when running autopkgtest with that version:
Failed: t0002-graceful.sh t0003-reopen-logs.sh t0004-heartbeat-
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1094447 in rainbows reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/rainbows/-/commit/a9c458162fc4df7b81f5daf7a36a
:
E AttributeError: `np.sctypes` was removed in the NumPy 2.0 release.
Access dtypes explicitly instead.
I'm working on it.
cheers
--
Antonio Valentino
Source: ruby-roo
Version: 2.10.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.3
Hi,
The ruby3.3 transition has started on unstable. During a test rebuild,
ruby-roo failed to build.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> Failure/Err
Source: ruby-rgfa
Version: 1.3.1+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.3
Hi,
The ruby3.3 transition has started on unstable. During a test rebuild,
ruby-rgfa failed to build.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> Error: tes
Source: ruby-rails-assets-underscore
Version: 1.8.3+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.3
Hi,
The ruby3.3 transition has started on unstable. During a test rebuild,
ruby-rails-assets-underscore failed to build.
R
Source: ruby-nokogumbo
Version: 2.0.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.3
Hi,
The ruby3.3 transition has started on unstable. During a test rebuild,
ruby-nokogumbo failed to build.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc -
Source: ruby-rails-assets-markdown-it-diaspora-mention
Version: 1.2.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.3
Hi,
The ruby3.3 transition has started on unstable. During a test rebuild,
ruby-rails-assets-markdown-it-diasp
Source: ruby-puppetlabs-spec-helper
Version: 7.0.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.3
Hi,
The ruby3.3 transition has started on unstable. During a test rebuild,
ruby-puppetlabs-spec-helper failed to build.
Relevant
Source: ruby-puppet-syntax
Version: 4.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.3
Hi,
The ruby3.3 transition has started on unstable. During a test rebuild,
ruby-puppet-syntax failed to build.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: ruby-grib
Version: 0.4.0-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.3
Hi,
The ruby3.3 transition has started on unstable. During a test rebuild,
ruby-grib failed to build.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> Failure/Er
Source: ruby-cleanroom
Version: 1.0.0-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.3
Hi,
The ruby3.3 transition has started on unstable. During a test rebuild,
ruby-cleanroom was found to fail to build in that situation.
Rel
Source: ruby-gitlab-flowdock-git-hook
Version: 1.0.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.3
Hi,
The ruby3.3 transition has started on unstable. During a test rebuild,
ruby-gitlab-flowdock-git-hook failed to build.
Rele
Source: ruby-dataobjects-sqlite3
Version: 0.10.17-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.3
Hi,
The ruby3.3 transition has started on unstable. During a test rebuild,
ruby-dataobjects-sqlite3 was found to fail to build.
R
Source: ruby-dataobjects
Version: 0.10.17-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.3
Hi,
The ruby3.3 transition has started on unstable. During a test rebuild,
ruby-dataobjects failed to build.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: ruby-api-pagination
Version: 4.8.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ruby3.3
Hi,
The ruby3.3 has started on unstable. During a test rebuild,
ruby-api-pagination was found to fail to build in that situation.
Releva
Hello,
As we are starting the ruby3.3 transition, these bugs are now release
critical and having their priorities bumped to serious.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
is to issue the request for removal as soon as all packages
previously depending on it migrate to testing.
Please do not consider the failure as blocking.
kind regards
--
Antonio Valentino
Package: rabbitmq-server
Version: 3.10.8-4
Control: fixed -1 3.12.1-1.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
As mentioned in #1069929¹, rabbitmq-server does not work with Erlang 27.
Given Erlang 27 has been uploaded to unstable recently, rabbitmq-server
is now broken in unstable
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1036369 in ruby-rest-client reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-rest-client/-/commit/f3440d724df4
-sqlalchemy-ext_1.4.46+ds1-1+b1_amd64.deb
$ sudo dpkg -i python3-sqlalchemy*.deb
But this leaves the system in an unconfigured state and it might
break other packages, so beware.
Ciao,
Antonio
--
Antonio Ospite
https://ao2.it
close 994456 0.2.26-2
thanks
t nltk
>>> nltk.download('wordnet')
[0m
For more information see: https://www.nltk.org/data.html
Attempted to load [93mcorpora/wordnet[0m
Searched in:
- '/sbuild-nonexistent/nltk_data'
- '/usr/nltk_data'
- '/usr/share/nltk_data'
- '/usr/lib/nltk_data'
- '/usr/share/nltk_data'
- '/usr/local/share/nltk_data'
- '/usr/lib/nltk_data'
- '/usr/local/lib/nltk_data'
**
make[1]: *** [debian/rules:14: override_dh_auto_build] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>'
make: *** [debian/rules:8: binary] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules binary subprocess returned exit status 2
[...]
Seems a duplicate of #1084342
cheers
--
Antonio Valentino
On Sun, 29 Sep 2024 19:51:16 +0200 Antonio Valentino
wrote:
On Sat, 31 Aug 2024 15:50:02 + Stefano Rivera
wrote:
> FWIW: I think these bugs were all caused by setuptools v72 dropping
> support for the "test" command, so dh-python has fallen back to
> distutils /
ug, look at the
implementation of test_suite in setup.py to see what magic it does for
test setup.
Stefano
--
Stefano Rivera
http://tumbleweed.org.za/
+1 415 683 3272
I have provided a Marge Request for this issue.
kind regards
--
Antonio Valentino
Source: geoalchemy2
Version: 0.15.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: geoalchemy2 fails to build from source on s390x
X-Debbugs-Cc: antonio.valent...@tiscali.it
Dear Maintainer,
the package is unable to migrate to testing due to a regression.
It is unable to build on s390x.
Looking
cording to https://github.com/mpi4py/mpi4py/issues/525 this is due to
the fact that "Open MPI does not support MPI-4 yet".
I'm wondering if mpi4py should have an dependency form another MPI
implementation.
kind regards
--
Antonio Valentino.PHONY: default, build, clean
PYTHO
*/
struct PyMPISessionObject {
PyObject_HEAD
MPI_Session ob_mpi; // line 2278
unsigned int flags;
PyObject *__weakref__;
};
typedef struct PyMPISessionObject PyMPISessionObject;
Which is clearly linked to an issue in mpi4py.
Reassigning to mpi4py.
--
Antonio Valentino
te-3.3.15-behavior-on-Ruby-3.1.patch
───┼─────
1 │ From: Antonio Terceiro
2 │ Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 11:14:01 -0300
3 │ Subject: Gem::Platform: emulate 3.3.15 behavior on Ruby 3.1
4 │
5 │ rubygems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1077462 in ruby reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby/-/commit/33f8604952f8302ed9522ddd6dc914fd832d
Package: podman
Version: 5.2.2+ds1-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
/etc/profile.d/podman-docker.sh is currently shipped in the podman
binary. If one also has docker installed, the DOCKER_HOST variable set
there makes docker try to connect to the podman daemon which is
Source: ohcount
Version: 4.0.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
Hi,
Your package fails to build on amd64. This seems caused by gcc 14 being
stricter than previous versions of the compiler. The full build log is
attached.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc -fPIC -g
Source: python-django-pyscss
Version: 2.0.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source
python-django-pyscss fails to build. This is hopefully the relevant
part the log:
8<8<8<-
===> Testing with python3
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1076961 in slimit reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/slimit/-/commit/f747007b3370907ec4746
ok, thanks for the info.
Il 20/08/24 18:22, Diederik de Haas ha scritto:
Then the new package version is working as intended and you should NOT
upgrade kmod until a new version of src:dracut has been uploaded,
which would 'fix' the Breaks relation.
So you gave the right response: 'n' (No)
IIUC
I tried to install the new version of kmod 33+20240816-2 but it seems to
remove essential packages:
$ sudo apt install kmod
Il seguente pacchetto è stato installato automaticamente e non è più
richiesto:
yubikey-personalization
Usare "apt autoremove" per rimuoverlo.
Upgrading:
kmod libkmod
because i did log report after system restore, so it took that version.
The affected version is 33+20240816-1.
Il 19/08/24 12:54, Diederik de Haas ha scritto:
Package: kmod
Version: 30+20230519-1
Why did you report it against 30+20230519-1?
Because AFAICT 30+20230519-1 and 32+20240611-1 are
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1072992 in pycryptodome reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/pycryptodome/-/commit/087470fd5
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1069534 in pycryptodome reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/pycryptodome/-/commit/86eb53701
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1069391 in nmap reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/nmap/-/commit/06ff1ac3296fd639ae1e9840b2c7
to "doris" one of my packages to migrate back in testing.
P.S:: @Andreas, I'm a DM and I would be happy to be listed as uploader
of this package if it is OK for you.
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/fastkml/-/merge_requests/1
kind regards
--
Antonio Valentino
(dracut)
shell gave
Failed to initialize libkmod context: Operation not supported
I (too) was able to roll back to systemd 255.5-1 (dpkg -i
/var/cache/apt/archives/*255.5-1*deb)
fully restoring the system.
Best,
Antonio
OpenPGP_0xB01C53D5DED4A4EE.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPG
1 as present in unstable
Neither of these packages should be including this file.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
ah, sorry.
Should I reopen?
--
Antonio Valentino
Dear Santiago,
Il 14/05/24 22:55, Santiago Vila ha scritto:
El 14/5/24 a las 7:15, Antonio Valentino escribió:
On Sat, 11 May 2024 21:46:59 +0200 Santiago Vila
wrote:
E error: unknown target CPU 'generic'
I'm sorry but I have no clue about this issue.
Looking at t
in pyopencl.
Do you have an idea if the updated versions of the package (e.g. the
ones currently in stable or in unstable) build properly on the same
platform?
kind regards
--
Antonio Valentino
that dpkg-dev version 1.22.5 (or later) allows you to use
Provides: ${t64:Provides}
to automatically generate the versioned Provides: line.
Best,
Antonio Russo
OpenPGP_0xB01C53D5DED4A4EE.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
rently this issue seems to be related to:
https://github.com/dask/dask/pull/11035
regards
--
Antonio Valentino
close 1069348 0.16.0-2
thanks
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1068537 in ruby-ethon reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-ethon/-/commit/c66b1a1db60d982a2648f449
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1066854 in ruby-magic reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-magic/-/commit/3a95d42fa6ea9355487927f2
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1068589 in gem2deb reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/gem2deb/-/commit/31ab3f4026d0365e9300a521d2a759
passed, 25 skipped, 268 deselected in 21.69s
==
[CUT]
According to what reported by upstream in
https://github.com/Unidata/MetPy/issues/3453 the issue is linked to an
outdated version of python3-pint.
An update to Pint v0.22 should fix the issue.
Reassign to point.
kind reagrds
--
Antonio Valentino
On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 11:45:58PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Control: tags 1067115 + patch
> Control: tags 1067115 + pending
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for gross (versioned as 1.0.2-4.1) and uploaded
> it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it.
>
Th
e seems to be related to the pytest-lazyfixture package.
See also https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063957.
I will reassign.
regards
--
Antonio Valentino
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 09:13:09PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> tried with 1.50+nmu2 which is in deferred for the next 11h. So tomorrow
> it should be all good.
Please make sure to commit the patch to the pristine-tar git repository
as well.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ot; and trigger another build attempt.
So, I'm asking for someone to please "give back" the build to the buildds, so
that
we can spin the roulette wheel and hopefully get a buildd with an ipv4 address.
Best,
Antonio Russo
[1] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/krb5
OpenPGP_0xB01C53D5DED
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1065091 in gtg reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/gtg/-/commit/89f6c4814684b99f82fbf6be1b4
Package: gtg
Version: 0.6-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
$ gtg
2024-02-29 14:44:05,373 - ERROR - application:do_activate:153 - Exception
during activation
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/GTG/gtk/application.py"
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1058111 in cmdtest reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/cmdtest/-/commit/dcf5b1bda3cb1ae41b2
symbol file.
kind reards
--
Antonio Valentino
1 - 100 of 1068 matches
Mail list logo