Bug#645309: debpartial-mirror: cannot handle duplicate entries in Packages

Package: debpartial-mirror Version: 0.2.99 Severity: grave (Normally important, but bumped to RC because it's breaking for security updates on squeeze and that needs to not happen) If a Packages file contains two entries for the same package name, debpartial-mirror will die with this exception:

Bug#639916: spread: license wackiness

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 07:28:03PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 15:50:27 +0100 Andrew Suffield wrote: > > > Package: spread > > Severity: serious > > > > "3. All advertising materials (including web pages) mentioning > > features

Bug#639916: spread: license wackiness

Package: spread Severity: serious "3. All advertising materials (including web pages) mentioning features or use of this software, or software that uses this software, must display the following acknowledgment: "This product uses software developed by Spread Concepts LLC for use in the Spread t

Bug#425694: kaya: uninstallable (dependency on g++-4.0)

Package: kaya Severity: serious The following packages have unmet dependencies. kaya: Depends: g++-4.0 but it is not installable -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#347241: cdrdao: cue2toc and its manpage are still in the package

On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 08:26:46AM -0500, Edward J. Shornock wrote: > cue2toc still exists in the upgraded package: Argh, fiddling with the damn diff and lost the damn change before uploading, I'll take care of it tomorrow. -- Andrew Suffield signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#346684: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

/bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=346684;msg=20 -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#346684: Intend to NMU fspanel

On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 06:05:58PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote: > I intend to NMU fspanel package, are you already working on > the bug? It's on my todo list for the next few days. This bug is less than a week old. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :'

Bug#348154: lvm2: fails to upgrade (and probably install)

= 0 ]; then You cannot do this in set -e. The script will always abort and fail if $? is not zero. You'll have to set +e or put the if around the command. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `'

Bug#343606: libcatalyst-perl: missing build-dep on libtemplate-perl

Package: libcatalyst-perl Severity: serious Version: 5.61-1 Fails to build without Template available, it's in Makefile.PL... -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : h

Bug#335105: perl FTBFS in t/op/fork

On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 07:39:04PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > Andrew Suffield wrote: > > This doesn't look like #223110 to me - that bug is specific to signal > > handlers. > > After a closer look I agree. > > > I just tried the test on casals against 5.8.7-

Bug#334030: FTBFS in rand()

or it. rand > does always have a non zero chance of collision, while fixed numbers > don't. Yes, it's completely insane... but I can't think of any way we could have this many failures without something being fundamentally broken somewh

Bug#334030: FTBFS in rand()

run outside the perl source tree, which I've tried running a whole load of times on mips and anything else to hand... it hasn't failed yet. My best guess is that /dev/urandom on the buildd isn't working right, but it's sheer guesswork since I can't actually look at the thing. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#335105: perl FTBFS in t/op/fork

ng somehow... -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#342468: tla package build failure in "make test" for "undo" test

> version >= 1.3.2 I tried to backport 1.3.3-2 to sarge. The build went fine but > the tests failed with an apparent tar error: Failing to build on sarge is not RC. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Su

Bug#321669: enigma: Copyright violation for menu.s3m

;re dealing with here, like midi files, are usually their own source. As distinct from mp3 or wav files, which usually aren't. For those who don't know, a module is in essence a midi file with embedded instrument samples. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield

Bug#318710: icheck: FTBFS on 64 bit arches: tests failed

stop emitting alignment with arch-dep numbers in it, so I'll have to rewrite the alignment processing logic a bit. Deal with that next week. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#306078: icheck: not for sarge

Package: icheck Severity: serious This one's not targetted for sarge, thanks. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, em

Bug#295264: php4-auth-pam: completely broken, crashes apache on start

loading is nice" would be good. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#293932: profile.py has non-free license

27;ve seen it before. There are other variations of md5.c, at least one of which has either a BSD or an MIT license, I forget which. Look around, you should find one easily enough. They're more or less equivalent, you may have to fiddle

Bug#289764: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems?

may > be a problem. There is no law, not even trademark law, against drawing pictures of somebody else's product. This whole affair is insane. Trademarks don't even apply outside their domain, and the domain of the "HUMMER" does not include artwork. -- .