I'm unlikely to get to this any time soon so feel free to NMU (with my
thanks!), Ana. Note: I haven't had a chance to look at the patch even
so it still deserves a thorough review.
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 7:00 PM, Evgeni Golov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Andrew, Hi Ana,
>
> #476023 was filled
Package: tetex-base
Version: 2.0.2c-8
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 9.1.2
Trying to upgrade from 20.2c-8 to 3.0.10:
dpkg: tetex-base: dependency problems, but removing anyway as you request:
tetex-bin depends on tetex-base.
(Reading database ... 98267 files and directories currently in
-g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -L/usr/X11R6/lib 9menu.o
> -lXext -lX11 -lselinux
I don't understand where this -lselinux comes from, and it builds
fine for me without it.
I'm not against changing the package, but only if there's good
reason.
Thanks.
--
Andrew Stribblehill <
Package: rtfm
Version: 2.0.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This is warning of a grave bug-to-be. We're removing request-tracker3,
upon which rtfm depends -- but that's okay because rtfm doesn't work
anyway with current rt 3.0. I'll leave this report with you for a week
Package: bash
Version: 3.0-10
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Hi. I recently upgraded to dpkg 1.13.9 and it appears that your
debian/rules line:
ARCH:= $(shell dpkg --print-gnu-build-architecture)
is failing due to the --print-gnu-build-architect
severity 290943 important
The package is still usable provided you're already using it.
--
Andrew Stribblehill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems programmer, IT Service, University of Durham, England
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe&qu
6 matches
Mail list logo