Bug#1081894: Help migrate railway-gtk to testing

librust-gdk4-dev 0.9.0-3 is in Debian testing. Please help migrate railway-gtk to testing.

Bug#1071147: bluez: autopkgtests fail due to lack of devices

On Fri, 31 May 2024 08:51:58 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 15 May 2024 10:16:55 +0200 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > wrote: > > If this can't be fixed in the > > short term by adding some type of restriction to the autopkgtest > > or by mocking the devices, then the tests should be remov

Bug#1069948: python3-pydevd: cannot be installed on Debian testing, unsatisfied dependency on gdb

Package: python3-pydevd Version: 2.10.0+ds-10 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, On an up-to-date Debian testing, python3-pydevd cannot be installed because of an unsatisfied dependency on gdb. Best, Amr -- System Information: Debian Release: trixie/sid

Bug#1056345: firefox: 119.0.1 missing build on amd64

Package: firefox Version: 119.0.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Dear Maintainer, Firefox 119.0.1-1 is missing build on amd64. Best, Amr -- Package-specific info: -- Addons package information -- System Informat

Bug#1040328: firefox: missing build on amd64

Package: firefox Version: 114.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Dear Maintainer, Firefox 114.0.2-1 is missing a build on amd64 (and others). Best, Amr -- Package-specific info: -- Addons package information -- Sy

Bug#1013876: Please close this bug report for keepassxc-browser to migrate to testing

On Sat, 24 Sep 2022 21:37:45 +0200 Guillem Jover wrote: > I've kept the package on hold since, but try to upgrade from time to > time to see whether its fixed. Last time I did with the latest version > currently in sid, it seemed to be still broken. Is this still broken in Chromium? There is no

Bug#1014310: src:openjfx: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on arm64 and armhf

On Sat, 13 Aug 2022 14:24:37 -0700 tony mancill wrote: > For JDK 11, I believe we want https://github.com/openjdk/jfx11u > For JDK 17, it would be https://github.com/openjdk/jfx17u > > Agreed. Java Team, should we be targeting OpenJFX 17 for bookworm, or > is an updated build of OpenJFX 11 of

Bug#1013876: Please close if fixed to migrate to testing

On Mon, 27 Jun 2022 07:21:33 +0200 Bruno Kleinert wrote: > thanks for the report. Something else in 1.8.0 is bugging me that may > be related to upstream's jQuery removal. I'm expecting upstream may > release 1.8.1 soonish. Hello, Please close this bug if fixed in unstable to migrate the packag