Hi Noah,
* Alexander Neumann wrote:
> * Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> > I'll see about getting a fixed upgraded for squeeze in the next day or
> > two...
>
> That would be excellent, thanks! And please let me know if I can help you in
> any way.
Did you find time to
Hi Noah,
* Alexander Neumann wrote:
> * Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> > I'll see about getting a fixed upgraded for squeeze in the next day or
> > two...
>
> That would be excellent, thanks! And please let me know if I can help you in
> any way.
Did you find time to
Hi,
* Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 01:15:39PM +0100, Alexander Neumann wrote:
> > This bug should be fixed ASAP squeeze, for example Hetzner[1] was allocated
> > 5.9.0.0/16, so a lot of mail servers are hit by this bug. A very simple
> > patch is att
Hi,
I've reopened this bug and set the severity to normal in order to keep track
on the code this bug pointed at.
The cryptographic verification code used in the function called by apt-key
net-update is utterly broken. The situation is not improved by replacing
"list-sigs" to "check-sigs", becau
Hi,
* Hakan Ardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the build problem of gcc-avr seems to be that a few of the patches I
> apply has now been applied to the src provided by gcc-src.
Ah, I see...
> To prevent this kind of problems in the future do you think it's a
> good idea to Build-Depend on an exac
5 matches
Mail list logo
