Bug#1074912: dircprxy / gcc-14 issue

2024-08-30 Thread Alex Pennace
is a dircproxy problem when the issue happens with gcc-14, but not with gcc-13. -- Alex Pennace, a...@pennace.org

Bug#1074912: dircproxy build failures

2024-08-06 Thread Alex Pennace
if I am wrong. -- Alex Pennace, a...@pennace.org

Bug#477025: libelfg0-dev: Missing on i386

2008-04-26 Thread Alex Pennace
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 04:05:42PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > libelfg0-dev 0.8.10-1 still includes these headers in /usr/include, > except for the i386 architecture. > > If we have to use the new location, so be it, and I'll happily include > the patch, but the current situation is not accep

Bug#445883: CVE-2007-5226 remote denial of service

2007-10-09 Thread Alex Pennace
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 11:55:20PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > Hi, > the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was > published for dircproxy. > > CVE-2007-5226[0]: > | irc_server.c in dircproxy 1.2.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to > | cause a denial of service (segmentation

Bug#285626: dircproxy: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment

2005-07-21 Thread Alex Pennace
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 10:21:30PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > Unless you plan to make a new upload in the next few days, or have any > objections to the following patch, I intend to NMU dircproxy shortly > to fix this RC bug. The patch is acceptable. Although I do plan to work on dircproxy this w