Bug#1102692: marked as done (janus: autopkgtest failure)

2025-07-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 22 Jul 2025 22:19:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1102692: fixed in janus 1.1.2-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1102692, regarding janus: autopkgtest failure to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#1108798: marked as done (sogo: CVE-2025-53603)

2025-07-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 22 Jul 2025 21:36:49 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1108798: fixed in sope 5.12.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1108798, regarding sogo: CVE-2025-53603 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Bug#1109556: marked as done (hunspell-dz: dictionary not working with LibreOffice)

2025-07-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 22 Jul 2025 18:49:01 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1109556: fixed in hunspell-dz 0.1.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1109556, regarding hunspell-dz: dictionary not working with LibreOffice to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#1109470: marked as done (ceph: CVE-2025-52555 regression)

2025-07-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 22 Jul 2025 18:11:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1109470: fixed in ceph 18.2.7+ds-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1109470, regarding ceph: CVE-2025-52555 regression to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#1109510: marked as done (strongswan: fails to dist-upgrade from bookworm to trixie)

2025-07-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 22 Jul 2025 16:34:40 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1109510: fixed in strongswan 6.0.1-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #1109510, regarding strongswan: fails to dist-upgrade from bookworm to trixie to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#1109510: [Pkg-swan-devel] Bug#1109510: Bug#1109510: strongswan: fails to dist-upgrade from bookworm to trixie

2025-07-22 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Tue, 2025-07-22 at 08:43 +0200, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote: > > as already said, that's not an option for us. There's no plan to retire > > strongswan-charon (and strongswan-starter) packages. > > Why would you drop the alternate dependency in Fork

Bug#1109165: marked as done (English offensive fortunes already removed. This package has no place in Debian)

2025-07-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 22 Jul 2025 15:04:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1109165: fixed in fortunes-it 2.16-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1109165, regarding English offensive fortunes already removed. This package has no place in Debian to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#1109167: marked as done (Offensive fortunes have been removed in English. This package has no place in Debian)

2025-07-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 22 Jul 2025 15:04:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1109167: fixed in fortunes-it 2.16-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1109167, regarding Offensive fortunes have been removed in English. This package has no place in Debian to be marked as done. This means

Bug#1109165: Bug#1109650: unblock: fortunes-it/2.16-2

2025-07-22 Thread Salvo Tomaselli
Hello > The bug report was from a Community Team member on behalf of said team > as far as I was informed. As you probably know, they created a bug report that contained 0 information and required a lot of imagination to be considered valid. You re-opened it as part of your role as release team

Processed: RM: Bug#1108033: Should dradio be removed from unstable?

2025-07-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1108033 normal Bug #1108033 [src:dradio] Should dradio be removed from unstable? Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' > retitle 1108033 RM: dradio -- RoQA; rc-buggy Bug #1108033 [src:dradio] Should dradio be removed from unstable? Chan

Bug#1109713: bleak: New version breaks other packages

2025-07-22 Thread Santiago Vila
Package: src:bleak Version: 1.0.1-1 Severity: grave Control: affects -1 src:python-idasen-ha Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, package src:python-idasen-ha failed to build due to the newer version of src:bleak which was uploaded on 2025-07-03. Full build logs are ava

Processed: bleak: New version breaks other packages

2025-07-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 src:python-idasen-ha Bug #1109713 [src:bleak] bleak: New version breaks other packages Added indication that 1109713 affects src:python-idasen-ha -- 1109713: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1109713 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow.

Bug#1109712: rust-zune-jpeg: Makes other packages to FTBFS

2025-07-22 Thread Santiago Vila
Package: src:rust-zune-jpeg Version: 0.4.18-1 Severity: grave Control: affects -1 src:resvg Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, package "resvg" failed to build due to the newer version of src:rust-zune-jpeg which was uploaded on 2025-06-27. Full build logs are availabl

Processed: rust-zune-jpeg: Makes other packages to FTBFS

2025-07-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 src:resvg Bug #1109712 [src:rust-zune-jpeg] rust-zune-jpeg: Makes other packages to FTBFS Added indication that 1109712 affects src:resvg -- 1109712: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1109712 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.

Processed: Re: Bug#1109607: devscripts: GPG part of tests starting to fail

2025-07-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #1109607 [devscripts] devscripts: test_debsign fails when aspcud resolver is used to determine build dependencies Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' -- 1109607: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1109607 Debian Bug

Bug#1109607: devscripts: GPG part of tests starting to fail

2025-07-22 Thread Holger Levsen
control: severity -1 important thanks On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 05:03:10PM -0400, James McCoy wrote: > This isn't showing up in ci.debian.net, but it is showing up in Salsa. > That suggests there's something specific about the Salsa environment > that's causing this. downgrading accordingly, also b

Bug#1091530: marked as done (mina2: CVE-2024-52046)

2025-07-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 22 Jul 2025 09:49:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1091530: fixed in mina2 2.2.1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1091530, regarding mina2: CVE-2024-52046 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not t

Bug#1109704: marked as done (RM: lxqt-wayland-session/0.1.1-3)

2025-07-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 22 Jul 2025 09:41:00 + with message-id and subject line remove lxqt-wayland-session has caused the Debian Bug report #1109704, regarding RM: lxqt-wayland-session/0.1.1-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#1109704: RM: lxqt-wayland-session/0.1.1-3

2025-07-22 Thread Joel OrĂ³n Valiente
Package: release.debian.org Severity: grave X-Debbugs-Cc: lxqt-wayland-sess...@packages.debian.org, mode...@gmail.com Control: affects -1 + src:lxqt-wayland-session User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm This version of lxqt-wayland-session is not suitable for testing.

Processed: RM: lxqt-wayland-session/0.1.1-3

2025-07-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:lxqt-wayland-session Bug #1109704 [release.debian.org] RM: lxqt-wayland-session/0.1.1-3 Added indication that 1109704 affects src:lxqt-wayland-session -- 1109704: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1109704 Debian Bug Tracking System

Bug#1109612: marked as done (cryptsetup-suspend: Stuck trying to suspend with certain processes running)

2025-07-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 22 Jul 2025 10:38:22 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1109612: cryptsetup-suspend: Stuck trying to suspend with certain processes running has caused the Debian Bug report #1109612, regarding cryptsetup-suspend: Stuck trying to suspend with certain processes

Bug#1108983: git: CVE-2025-27613 CVE-2025-27614 CVE-2025-46835 CVE-2025-48384 CVE-2025-48385 CVE-2025-48386

2025-07-22 Thread Harald Dunkel
Please note the CVEs affect Debian's git 2.50.0-1 as well, AFAICS. They are supposed to be fixed for upstream's git version 2.50.1 (https://raw.githubusercontent.com/git/git/master/Documentation/RelNotes/2.50.1.adoc) Regards Harri

Processed: python-eventlet: New version makes several packages to FTBFS

2025-07-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 src:glance src:mistral src:python-oslo.concurrency > src:python-oslo.messaging Bug #1109700 [src:python-eventlet] python-eventlet: New version makes several packages to FTBFS Added indication that 1109700 affects src:glance, src:mistral, src:python-oslo

Bug#1109700: python-eventlet: New version makes several packages to FTBFS

2025-07-22 Thread Santiago Vila
Package: src:python-eventlet Version: 0.40.1-1 Severity: grave Control: affects -1 src:glance src:mistral src:python-oslo.concurrency src:python-oslo.messaging Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, the following packages failed to build due to the newer version of src:p

Processed: retitle 1109499 bacula-common: preinst intentionally aborts unattended upgrade of bacula-director

2025-07-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 1109499 bacula-common: preinst intentionally aborts unattended > upgrade of bacula-director Bug #1109499 [bacula-director-sqlite3] bacula-common: preinst intentionally breaks upgrade Changed Bug title to 'bacula-common: preinst intention