Bug#1021656: tt-rss Debian package?

2025-07-16 Thread Leonard Lausen
Hi Sebastian, Thank you for pushing the wip/ branches. I tried building the git20240516.8b037e8+dfsg-1 version via wip/master, but it fails as below: [...] # Debian package for php-tokenizer ln -s ../../../../../php/TheSeer/Tokenizer debian/tt-rss/usr/share/tt-rss/www/vendor/theseer/tokenizer/s

Bug#1078640: puma: will FTBFS during trixie support period

2025-07-16 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Hi, > Em 16 de jul. de 2025, à(s) 18:47, Timo Röhling > escreveu: > > Hi, > > as an alternative proposal, the attached patch fixes the bug by re-generating > the example certificates before the test. I am not sure if we want to add Java runtime as dependency here. I discussed that with Ath

Bug#1109167: Can the community team remove packages or kick me out for not removing packages?

2025-07-16 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 11:35:55PM +0200, Antoine Le Gonidec wrote: > Le Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 07:42:06PM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli a écrit : > > I did that by removing tens of sexist, homophobic and racist jokes > > that were not in the offensive section, and had been there at least > > since 2004. >

Bug#1109253: hunspell-nl: Hunspell-nl dutch spelling checker isn't showing in LibreOffice.

2025-07-16 Thread Soren Stoutner
I have created an upstream LibreOffice bug report: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=167534 -- Soren Stoutner so...@debian.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#1109253: at least nl_BE definitely needs to be put back

2025-07-16 Thread Soren Stoutner
On Wednesday, July 16, 2025 11:12:32 AM Mountain Standard Time Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > > Am 16.07.25 um 19:02 schrieb Soren Stoutner: > > In the case of Dutch, LibreOffice only recognizes two language codes, nl_NL > > and nl_BE, which makes the previous shipping of nl_AW and nl_SR in Debia

Bug#1103503: marked as done (/etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.dhclient references non-existent local/sbin.dhclient which breaks apparmor)

2025-07-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Jul 2025 22:49:14 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103503: fixed in isc-dhcp 4.4.3-P1-8 has caused the Debian Bug report #1103503, regarding /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.dhclient references non-existent local/sbin.dhclient which breaks apparmor to be marked as do

Bug#1104344: marked as done (/etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.dhclient references non-existent local/sbin.dhclient which breaks apparmor)

2025-07-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Jul 2025 22:49:14 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1103503: fixed in isc-dhcp 4.4.3-P1-8 has caused the Debian Bug report #1103503, regarding /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.dhclient references non-existent local/sbin.dhclient which breaks apparmor to be marked as do

Bug#1109339: marked as done (imagemagick: CVE-2025-53014 CVE-2025-53015 CVE-2025-53019 CVE-2025-53101)

2025-07-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Jul 2025 22:19:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1109339: fixed in imagemagick 8:7.1.1.47+dfsg1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1109339, regarding imagemagick: CVE-2025-53014 CVE-2025-53015 CVE-2025-53019 CVE-2025-53101 to be marked as done. This means

Bug#1109253: at least nl_BE definitely needs to be put back

2025-07-16 Thread Kurt Roeckx
It doesn't matter which combinations are supported by Libreoffice, it can be used by other software too. It's the official spelling for: - Netherlands (including Bonaire, Sint Eustatius en Saba) - Belgium - Suriname Aruba, Curaçao, and Sint Maarten also seem to be part of the Netherlands, but ar

Bug#1109167: Can the community team remove packages or kick me out for not removing packages?

2025-07-16 Thread Antoine Le Gonidec
Le Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 07:42:06PM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli a écrit : > I did that by removing tens of sexist, homophobic and racist jokes > that were not in the offensive section, and had been there at least > since 2004. Does that mean that sexist, homophobic and/or racist jokes that were in the -

Bug#1078640: marked as done (puma: will FTBFS during trixie support period)

2025-07-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Jul 2025 20:41:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1078640: fixed in puma 6.6.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1078640, regarding puma: will FTBFS during trixie support period to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#1109340: cpp-httplib: CVE-2025-52887 CVE-2025-53628 CVE-2025-53629

2025-07-16 Thread Andrea Pappacoda
Hi Moritz, On Tue Jul 15, 2025 at 2:37 PM CEST, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: Package: cpp-httplib X-Debbugs-CC: t...@security.debian.org Severity: grave Tags: security Hi, The following vulnerabilities were published for cpp-httplib. CVE-2025-52887[0]: [...] CVE-2025-53628[1]: [...] CVE-2025-5362

Bug#1109165: Can the community team remove packages or kick me out for not removing packages?

2025-07-16 Thread Salvo Tomaselli
Hello, I think I need some clarification on the scope of the role of the community team. I am talking about bugs #1109165 and #1109167 PREMISE === Let me start by saying that fortunes-it-off has existed since 2003 and there have been 0 complaints from offended people in these 22 years. It'

Bug#1109253: at least nl_BE definitely needs to be put back

2025-07-16 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 16.07.25 um 20:12 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Am 16.07.25 um 19:02 schrieb Soren Stoutner: In the case of Dutch, LibreOffice only recognizes two language codes, nl_NL and nl_BE, which makes the previous shipping of nl_AW and nl_SR in Debian superfluous. Indeed. I didn't do those links. (Th

Bug#1078640: puma: will FTBFS during trixie support period

2025-07-16 Thread Timo Röhling
Hi, as an alternative proposal, the attached patch fixes the bug by re-generating the example certificates before the test. Cheers Timo On Wed, 28 May 2025 14:49:16 +0200 Santiago Vila wrote: tags 1078640 patch thanks Hello. The attached trivial patch (to be imported with quilt) should fi

Bug#1109253: at least nl_BE definitely needs to be put back

2025-07-16 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 16.07.25 um 19:02 schrieb Soren Stoutner: I lived for two years in Perú and speak fairly decent Spanish. When I go to enable Spanish spell checking in LibreOffice, I see the following list of options: [...] Yes, that's how LO does it. It is dep in it. But the truth is that this ent

Bug#1109253: at least nl_BE definitely needs to be put back

2025-07-16 Thread Soren Stoutner
René, On Tuesday, July 15, 2025 11:38:37 PM Mountain Standard Time René Engelhard wrote: > >Country or region specific dictionaries should only exist if they actually > >contain distinct country or region specific information. So, for example, if > >upstream shipped a nl_BE.dic that was differe

Bug#1109025: Bug#1109244: unblock: b43-fwcutter/1:019-14 (pre-approval)

2025-07-16 Thread Paul Gevers
tag 1109244 confirmed moreinfo thanks Hi, On 14-07-2025 08:29, Mathias Gibbens wrote: Pre-approval request to unblock package b43-fwcutter Please go ahead. Remove the moreinfo tag once the upload has happened. Maybe the mechanism to determine the URL could be changed after the trixie relea

Bug#1108992: opendnssec: OpenDNSSEC is (almost) End-of-Life

2025-07-16 Thread Bastian Germann
All of the reverse dependencies should be okay when #1109389 is fixed.

Bug#1109253: at least nl_BE definitely needs to be put back

2025-07-16 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 16.07.25 um 19:02 schrieb Soren Stoutner: In the case of Dutch, LibreOffice only recognizes two language codes, nl_NL and nl_BE, which makes the previous shipping of nl_AW and nl_SR in Debian superfluous. Indeed. I didn't do those links. (They don't do harm, though) rene@frodo:~/LibreO

Bug#1108934: libexpat1: missing Pre-Depends on libc6 (>= 2.38) causes error during python3-cryptography upgrade (?)

2025-07-16 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, Thanks for all working on this. On 13-07-2025 21:37, Niels Thykier wrote: My recommendation is to:  1) Patch `libexpat1` to use `Pre-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}`. It only     has a single dependency on amd64 (libc), so it should be safe and be     a work around  2) File an RC bug again

Processed: tagging 1109372, tagging 1109373, tagging 1109374, tagging 1109378, tagging 1109376, tagging 1109377 ...

2025-07-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1109372 + upstream Bug #1109372 [mysql-8.0] mysql-8.0: CVE-2025-50077 CVE-2025-50078 CVE-2025-50079 CVE-2025-50080 CVE-2025-50081 CVE-2025-50082 CVE-2025-50083 CVE-2025-50084 CVE-2025-50085 CVE-2025-50086 CVE-2025-50087 CVE-2025-50088 CVE-

Bug#1108063: #1108063 shelr broken by ruby 3.2+

2025-07-16 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 patch This is the only place exists() is used, so the obvious fix is this one-character change, but I have not tested whether there are also other issues. --- a/lib/shelr/recorder.rb +++ b/lib/shelr/recorder.rb @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ module Shelr end def check_record_di

Processed: Re: #1108063 shelr broken by ruby 3.2+

2025-07-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #1108063 [shelr] shelr: does not work for Trixie with Ruby 3.3 Added tag(s) patch. -- 1108063: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1108063 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1108550: #1108550 reprotest sudo -h

2025-07-16 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Simply removing (both instances of) -h localhost builds and passes autopkgtests, but has *not* been tested beyond that; in particular, I do *not* know whether it opens any security holes reprotest doesn't already have. https://salsa.debian.org/rnpalmer-guest/reprotest/-/commits/test1108550

Processed: fortunes-*-off won't be part of trixie

2025-07-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reopen 1109167 Bug #1109167 [fortunes-it-off] Offensive fortunes have been removed in English. This package has no place in Debian Bug 1109167 is not marked as done; doing nothing. > reopen 1109165 Bug #1109165 [fortunes-scn-off] English offensive fortunes already r

Processed: fortunes-*-off won't be part of trixie

2025-07-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reopen 1109167 Bug #1109167 [fortunes-it-off] Offensive fortunes have been removed in English. This package has no place in Debian Bug 1109167 is not marked as done; doing nothing. > reopen 1109165 Bug #1109165 [fortunes-scn-off] English offensive fortunes already r

Processed: fortunes-*-off won't be part of trixie

2025-07-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reopen 1109167 Bug #1109167 {Done: Salvo Tomaselli } [fortunes-it-off] Offensive fortunes have been removed in English. This package has no place in Debian Bug reopened Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1109167 to the same values previously set > re

Bug#1109166: fortunes-*-off won't be part of trixie

2025-07-16 Thread Paul Gevers
Control: reopen 1109167 Control: reopen 1109165 Hi, With my Release Team hat on I'm reinforcing the decision of the community team that the offensive flavors of fortune packages don't have a place in Debian anymore. Please drop the fortune-*-off binary packages. Paul OpenPGP_signature.asc

Bug#1109070: marked as done (rust-sequoia-octopus-librnp FTBFS with the nocheck build profile)

2025-07-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Jul 2025 13:04:16 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1109070: fixed in rust-sequoia-octopus-librnp 1.11.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1109070, regarding rust-sequoia-octopus-librnp FTBFS with the nocheck build profile to be marked as done. This means tha

Processed: severity

2025-07-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1102637 serious Bug #1102637 [src:golang-github-eggsampler-acme] golang-github-eggsampler-acme: Wrong BSD-3-Clause variant Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you n

Bug#1098586: #1098586 orange-canvas-core segfault

2025-07-16 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Still FTBFS in reproducible-builds: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/orange-canvas-core.html Fails on amd64 and armhf but not arm64, since around 2025-02-xx. (I don't know why these two bugs were ever merged, as they don't look like the same bug: this one's back

Processed: cpp-httplib: CVE-2025-52887 CVE-2025-53628 CVE-2025-53629

2025-07-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > found -1 0.18.7-1 Bug #1109340 [cpp-httplib] cpp-httplib: CVE-2025-52887 CVE-2025-53628 CVE-2025-53629 There is no source info for the package 'cpp-httplib' at version '0.18.7-1' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for version '0.18.7-1' Marked as

Bug#1109340: cpp-httplib: CVE-2025-52887 CVE-2025-53628 CVE-2025-53629

2025-07-16 Thread Bastian Germann
Control: found -1 0.18.7-1 This is not specific to 0.21. Adding the test to 0.18.7, it fails: [ RUN ] ServerTest.HeaderCountExceedsLimit ../test/test.cc:3709: Failure Expected equality of these values: StatusCode::BadRequest_400 Which is: 400 res->status Which is: 200 [ FAILED

Bug#1109373: virtualbox: CVE-2025-53024 CVE-2025-53025 CVE-2025-53026 CVE-2025-53027 CVE-2025-53028 CVE-2025-53029 CVE-2025-53030

2025-07-16 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
Package: virtualbox X-Debbugs-CC: t...@security.debian.org Severity: grave Tags: security Hi, The following vulnerabilities were published for virtualbox. CVE-2025-53024[0]: | Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle | Virtualization (component: Core). The supported version

Bug#1109372: mysql-8.0: CVE-2025-50077 CVE-2025-50078 CVE-2025-50079 CVE-2025-50080 CVE-2025-50081 CVE-2025-50082 CVE-2025-50083 CVE-2025-50084 CVE-2025-50085 CVE-2025-50086 CVE-2025-50087 CVE-2025-50

2025-07-16 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
Package: mysql-8.0 X-Debbugs-CC: t...@security.debian.org Severity: grave Tags: security Hi, The following vulnerabilities were published for mysql-8.0. CVE-2025-50077[0]: | Vulnerability in the MySQL Server product of Oracle MySQL | (component: InnoDB). Supported versions that are affected are

Processed: unarchive needs to go here not the bug number Re: #1098586

2025-07-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unarchive 1098586 Bug #1098586 {Done: Daniel Baumann } [python3-tqdm] orange-canvas-core: FTBFS: Segmentation fault Unarchived Bug 1098586 > unmerge 1098586 Bug #1098586 {Done: Daniel Baumann } [python3-tqdm] orange-canvas-core: FTBFS: Segmentat

Bug#1109253: at least nl_BE definitely needs to be put back

2025-07-16 Thread Kurt Roeckx
BE is just as primary as NL. There was an institute generated, containing members of both. The other 2 counties have also agreed to it. So it's the official spelling for those 4. But there are differences in the uses. For instance some words are male or female in 1 county, but are genderless i